After several months of using btrfs in our forum in production with no issue, I can say that btrfs seems quite stable and I am proposing to add it to the supported storage drivers under docker.
Using btrfs makes it a breeze to take snapshots and revert to a previous state of discourse, and taking backups with minimal forum interrupt time.
Here is a discussion about it in discourse forum:
https://meta.discourse.org/t/unable-to-rebuild-app-not-supported-docker-storage-driver-btrfs/209200/14
fi
# 2. running an approved storage driver?
- if ! $docker_path info 2> /dev/null | egrep -q 'Storage Driver: (aufs|zfs|overlay2)$'; then
+ if ! $docker_path info 2> /dev/null | egrep -q 'Storage Driver: (btrfs|aufs|zfs|overlay2)$'; then
echo "Your Docker installation is not using a supported storage driver. If we were to proceed you may have a broken install."
echo "overlay2 is the recommended storage driver, although zfs and aufs may work as well."
echo "Other storage drivers are known to be problematic."