<i class="glyphicon glyphicon-calendar"></i>: <a class="lpcalendarlink" href="/2020/program/#2748">Saturday 14:30 - 15:15</a>
<i class="glyphicon glyphicon-home"></i>: Back Bay Grand
</br>
-<i class="glyphicon glyphicon-road"></i>: <span class="lptrack lptrack4">Social context</span>
+<i class="glyphicon glyphicon-road"></i>: <span class="lptrack lptrack1">Licensing</span>
</div>
-<div class="abstract">x</div>
+<div class="abstract"><div class="webform-long-answer">Most IoT (The Internet of Things) devices remain under the control of the companies that manufacture them, yielding a plethora of security, privacy and software freedom concerns. Ironically, most such devices include Linux as their kernel, and usually no GNU. Linux's license, GPLv2, mandates the users' rights to modify and upgrade the software. Sadly, due to widespread violations of the GPL, such rights are rarely granted with most IoT devices on the market. This talk explains the political, social, and legal backstory that led to this abysmal situation, and proposes what we must do next to ameliorate the problem.<br />\r
+<br />\r
+These embedded devices typically remain under the complete control of the manufacturer — not only for their basic functionality — but for safety and security updates as well. In many cases, these devices require Herculean efforts by the home user to modify and upgrade.<br />\r
+<br />\r
+This talk explains the political, social, and legal ramifications of this abysmal situation. Attendees can expect a full explanation of the history of GPL enforcement, how it has historically defended the rights of hobbyist modifications to home devices, and what processes exist now to continue that fight.</div></div>
</div>
<div class="speakerblock">
projects / libreplanet-static.git / blobdiff