initial commit for LP 2017 speaker slides repo
[lp17-speaker-slides.git] / Pamela-Chestek / LibrePlanet2017preso.pin
CommitLineData
d2579ed7
AE
1#!/usr/bin/env pinpoint
2
3[font=Sans 100px]
4[R&RHallofFametrans.jpg]
5[text-color=black]
6[text-align=center]
7[shading-opacity=0]
8[fill]
9
10-- [text-color=white][text-align=left][bottom-left][R&RHallofFame.jpg]
11
12Rock and roll bands
13and free software projects:
14A comparative analysis
15
16
17<span size="x-small">Pamela Chestek, Chestek Legal</span>
18
19--
20
21Introduction
22
23--
24
25<i>Videos!</i>
26
27#I am showing videos!
28
29--
30
31    the purpose and character of the use
32 
33 
34
35--
36
37✓ the purpose and character of the use
38
39<b>It's educational!</b>
40--
41
42   the nature of the copyrighted work
43 
44 
45
46--
47
48X the nature of the copyrighted work
49
50<b>(Oops)</b>
51
52--
53
54   the amount and substantiality
55of the portion taken
56 
57 
58
59--
60
61? the amount and substantiality
62of the portion taken
63
64<b>Not so much</b>
65
66--
67
68   the effect of the use upon
69the potential market
70 
71 
72
73--
74
75How many are attending
76the session just so you
77can watch music videos?
78
79#You have to leave.
80
81
82--[transition=page-curl]
83
84How many of you came for
85the big hair and Vincent Price
86with an 80’s glam band?
87
88--[Ratt.mp4]
89
90#play 1:11
91
92--
93
94✓the effect of the use upon
95the potential market
96
97<b>None I hope.</b>
98
99--
100
101Why bands?
102
103#A lot of similarities
104
105#Can come together casually
106#but also can be formally operated businesses.
107
108#There are individual contributors but there is a
109#collective identity at the same time The name is
110#the crux of the question; it represents both the
111#collective and the product, the musical
112#performers and the records; in software it is
113#the members of the group and the software name
114
115--
116
117Who owns the "project"?
118
119--
120
121It might be the employer
122
123#Who could forget the spectacular hit by the
124#Righteous Brothers?
125
126-- [RighteousBros.mp4]
127
128#play 50 secs
129
130#I apologize for the quality of the next, but it's
131#worth it. I love Dick Clark's introduction of the
132#upcoming song, where he is remarkably tactful
133#about it, in an "it's ... interesting" kind of
134#way
135
136-- [VitoUnchainedMelody.mp4][duration=165]
137
138#play 2:45
139
140#"You walk about nine miles"
141
142#Vito and the Salutations was a band that left one
143#manager and started with another manager. The
144#original manager was able to hang on to some of
145#the original members and put together a new
146#arrangement of "Vito and the Salutations," so
147#there were competing groups called "Vito and the
148#Salutations."
149
150#22 people performed with the group and “Vito” as
151#the lead wasn’t always the original member named
152#Vito, it was 10 different people.
153
154#Rick, as manager and promoter of "Vito and the
155#Salutations," conceived of the group's
156#performance as an "act" in which each member
157#played a particular role. As individuals left
158#the group, others were found to replace them and
159#to assume their respective parts.
160
161
162-- [Vito5.jpg][fit][transition=swing]
163
164-- [Vito4.jpg][fit][transition=sheet]
165
166#But who could forget the most famous act that
167#didn't start out as a band...
168
169-- [Monkees.mp4]
170
171#play 52 secs
172
173#Monkees - no lawsuit, but they were a band put
174#together for a TV show. But they have toured in
175#the past few years
176
177--
178
179Or, it might not be, if the
180association is with the group
181
182-- [NewEdition.webm]
183
184#play 1:26
185
186#Recognize the place?
187
188#Four of the five plaintiffs performed locally as
189#“New Edition.” They performed in a talent show
190#organized by Maurice Starr. As far back as 1972
191#Starr had an idea for “80’s black bubblegum
192#music,” “essentially the Jackson Five updated by
193#the addition of modern elements like synthesizers
194#(electronic instrumentation) and rap (speaking
195#parts).” Starr thought the boys were short on
196#talent but used them to demo “Candy Girl.” Starr
197#ultimately entered into employment contracts with
198#the singers. The contract said that Starr could
199#use whatever artists he wanted. The band was
200#called “New Edition,” although Starr wanted a
201#different name. All the employment contracts
202#said that Starr owned the “New Editions”
203#name. Originally they lip-synced their
204#performance and Starr played backup, then they
205#started to tour without Starr. The band got more
206#successful, touring internationally. The five
207#band members were minors and so were allowed to
208#disaffirm the contract.
209
210#"They have appeared on television shows, at charity
211#events, and -- the crowning sign of success --
212#they have even been featured in a COKE commercial."
213
214#The court held that the band owned it resulting
215#from their use of it when working for Starr.
216
217--
218
219Bands, like free software, have
220the concept of the collective
221
222-- [Kingsmen.mp4]
223
224#play 56 secs
225
226#Kingsmen, unincorporated association, sued
227#former member Ely who performed on an album as
228#the Kingsmen. But he couldn’t use it without the
229#rest of the group
230
231#"Moreover, having listened to the recordings by
232#The Kingsmen submitted as exhibits to the Court,
233#including the #original recording of Louie,
234#Kingsmen's music. Although the listener can
235#discern the lead singer from the background
236#vocals and music on a number of Kingsmen songs,
237#the group's "sound" is clearly a collective
238#one. No one member of the group can be singled
239#out as representing the essence of The
240#Kingsmen's performing style."
241
242--[transition=slide-up]
243
244The well-meaning custodian
245
246#The Intruders
247
248--[Intruders.mp4]
249
250#play 1:04
251
252#Between 1966 and 1976 the Original Group released
253#approximately twenty-five recordings that made
254#the Billboard Charts. The Original Group
255#disbanded in 1976, and no group performed under
256#the name "The Intruders" from that time until the
257#early 1980's. In 1983 the former members assigned
258#all rights in the name "The Intruders" to one
259#member Eugene Daughtry and said they wouldn't
260#subsequently seek to participate in any group
261#called "The Intruders" as a result of their
262#membership in the Original Group. Daughtry
263#performed with defendant Montgomery.
264
265#In July 7, 1994, when he was ill, Daughtry
266#transferred an undivided right, title and
267#interest in the name "The Intruders" to his
268#brother Fred and Original Group member Phillip
269#Terry as joint tenants, with a right of
270#survivorship. Daughtry passed away and his
271#brother Fred told #Montgomery to stop performing
272#and started his own "Intruders" band with
273##plaintiff Mears.
274
275#Fred Daugthry died and purely as a matter of
276#estate law Phillip Terry was the owner of the
277#trademark but he hadn't been performing with or
278#managing either group. He had been named because
279#Eugene Daughtry, the original brother, trusted
280#him. Phillip #Terry said that Eugene had given
281#him and Fred so that the two of them could
282#"preserve" the name "the Intruders", and oversee
283#the makeup of any band #bearing the Intruders
284#name after Eugene's death. Phillip Terry appears
285#to have switched sides
286
287--
288
289Bands fork! And they fight ...
290
291--[Drifters.mp4][transition=slide-left]
292
293#play 2:46
294
295#The band was formed in 1953 and the first
296#lawsuit filed in 1958, 60 years ago and it might
297#be over? (2017 appeals court decision on
298#registration of trademark). Who are the
299#real Drifters?
300
301--
302
303The Drifters
304Treadwell’s Drifters
305The Original Drifters
306Treadwell’s Original Drifters
307Bill Pinkey’s Original Drifters
308
309#This is not limited to the Drifters.
310
311--[WaPoclip.png][fit]
312
313#The reference to the inaguration is to President
314#Clinton's inaguration
315
316#Larry Marshak bought shares of companies that
317#the bands had set up and then later claimed that
318#he owned the trademarks and therefore the
319#bands. Beware the troll.
320
321--
322
323But sometimes you can
324get away with it ...
325
326-- [BlackFlagcomposite.jpg]
327
328
329#A group of former band members reformed 20 years
330#later as a “tribute” band; another of the former
331#members not included formed his own band. The
332#court found the use of "Flag" and the logo
333#dissimilar enough to the original band that they
334#could continue to perform as "Flag"
335
336
337--
338And you can’t sit on your rights
339
340##Fulanito - 2 photos
341
342--[FulanitoComposite.jpg][fit]
343
344--
345
346How to refer to the former project
347
348
349--[Steppenwolf.mp4]
350
351#play 1:35
352#it just seemed to be time for a musical interlude
353
354--
355
356"Former Original Member of Steppenwolf,"
357"Original Founding Member of Steppenwolf"
358"Formerly of Steppenwolf"
359
360<span foreground='red' size='xx-large'>OK!</span>
361
362##Steppenwolf ok, Commodores not ok
363
364--[Commodoresname.png][fit]
365
366--[Commodores.mp4]
367
368#play 36 secs
369
370#McClary was lead guitar
371
372--
373
374Who owns the copyright?
375
376
377#John Fogerty wrote "Run Through the Jungle" in
378#1970 but didn't own the rights. In 1984 he wrote
379#"the Old Man Down the Road" and was sued by his
380#former record company.
381
382
383--[CCR.mp4]
384
385#play all of it
386
387#There was a jury verdict that the "Old Man Down
388#the Road" did not infringe the copyright in "Run
389#Through the Jungle." It went to the Supreme
390##Court on attorneys' fees, which Fogerty won
391
392--
393
394Credits:
395
396Rock and Roll Hall of Fame,
397Rob Zand, CC-BY-SA,
398https://flic.kr/p/7qdcTb
399
400<i>And thanks fair use!</i>
401
402--[font=Sans 100px][text-color=white][R&RHallofFame.jpg]
403
404
405Thanks!