+
+ {
+#ifdef SUPPORT_DANE
+ if (state->verify_requirement == VERIFY_DANE && state->host)
+ {
+ /* Using dane_verify_session_crt() would be easy, as it does it all for us
+ including talking to a DNS resolver. But we want to do that bit ourselves
+ as the testsuite intercepts and fakes its own DNS environment. */
+
+ dane_state_t s;
+ dane_query_t r;
+ uint lsize;
+ const gnutls_datum_t * certlist =
+ gnutls_certificate_get_peers(state->session, &lsize);
+ int usage = tls_out.tlsa_usage;
+
+# ifdef GNUTLS_BROKEN_DANE_VALIDATION
+ /* Split the TLSA records into two sets, TA and EE selectors. Run the
+ dane-verification separately so that we know which selector verified;
+ then we know whether to do name-verification (needed for TA but not EE). */
+
+ if (usage == ((1<<DANESSL_USAGE_DANE_TA) | (1<<DANESSL_USAGE_DANE_EE)))
+ { /* a mixed-usage bundle */
+ int i, j, nrec;
+ const char ** dd;
+ int * ddl;
+
+ for(nrec = 0; state->dane_data_len[nrec]; ) nrec++;
+ nrec++;
+
+ dd = store_get(nrec * sizeof(uschar *));
+ ddl = store_get(nrec * sizeof(int));
+ nrec--;
+
+ if ((rc = dane_state_init(&s, 0)))
+ goto tlsa_prob;
+
+ for (usage = DANESSL_USAGE_DANE_EE;
+ usage >= DANESSL_USAGE_DANE_TA; usage--)
+ { /* take records with this usage */
+ for (j = i = 0; i < nrec; i++)
+ if (state->dane_data[i][0] == usage)
+ {
+ dd[j] = state->dane_data[i];
+ ddl[j++] = state->dane_data_len[i];
+ }
+ if (j)
+ {
+ dd[j] = NULL;
+ ddl[j] = 0;
+
+ if ((rc = dane_raw_tlsa(s, &r, (char * const *)dd, ddl, 1, 0)))
+ goto tlsa_prob;
+
+ if ((rc = dane_verify_crt_raw(s, certlist, lsize,
+ gnutls_certificate_type_get(state->session),
+ r, 0,
+ usage == DANESSL_USAGE_DANE_EE
+ ? DANE_VFLAG_ONLY_CHECK_EE_USAGE : 0,
+ &verify)))
+ {
+ DEBUG(D_tls)
+ debug_printf("TLSA record problem: %s\n", dane_strerror(rc));
+ }
+ else if (verify == 0) /* verification passed */
+ {
+ usage = 1 << usage;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (rc) goto tlsa_prob;
+ }
+ else
+# endif
+ {
+ if ( (rc = dane_state_init(&s, 0))
+ || (rc = dane_raw_tlsa(s, &r, state->dane_data, state->dane_data_len,
+ 1, 0))
+ || (rc = dane_verify_crt_raw(s, certlist, lsize,
+ gnutls_certificate_type_get(state->session),
+ r, 0,
+# ifdef GNUTLS_BROKEN_DANE_VALIDATION
+ usage == (1 << DANESSL_USAGE_DANE_EE)
+ ? DANE_VFLAG_ONLY_CHECK_EE_USAGE : 0,
+# else
+ 0,
+# endif
+ &verify))
+ )
+ goto tlsa_prob;
+ }
+
+ if (verify != 0) /* verification failed */
+ {
+ gnutls_datum_t str;
+ (void) dane_verification_status_print(verify, &str, 0);
+ *errstr = US str.data; /* don't bother to free */
+ goto badcert;
+ }
+
+# ifdef GNUTLS_BROKEN_DANE_VALIDATION
+ /* If a TA-mode TLSA record was used for verification we must additionally
+ verify the cert name (but not the CA chain). For EE-mode, skip it. */
+
+ if (usage & (1 << DANESSL_USAGE_DANE_EE))
+# endif
+ {
+ state->peer_dane_verified = state->peer_cert_verified = TRUE;
+ goto goodcert;
+ }
+# ifdef GNUTLS_BROKEN_DANE_VALIDATION
+ /* Assume that the name on the A-record is the one that should be matching
+ the cert. An alternate view is that the domain part of the email address
+ is also permissible. */
+
+ if (gnutls_x509_crt_check_hostname(state->tlsp->peercert,
+ CS state->host->name))
+ {
+ state->peer_dane_verified = state->peer_cert_verified = TRUE;
+ goto goodcert;
+ }
+# endif
+ }
+#endif /*SUPPORT_DANE*/
+
projects / exim.git / blobdiff