-/* $Cambridge: exim/src/src/smtp_in.c,v 1.55 2007/02/20 15:58:02 ph10 Exp $ */
+/* $Cambridge: exim/src/src/smtp_in.c,v 1.56 2007/03/21 15:10:39 ph10 Exp $ */
/*************************************************
* Exim - an Internet mail transport agent *
static BOOL helo_accept_junk;
static BOOL count_nonmail;
static BOOL pipelining_advertised;
+static BOOL rcpt_smtp_response_same;
+static BOOL rcpt_in_progress;
static int nonmail_command_count;
static int synprot_error_count;
static int unknown_command_count;
static int sync_cmd_limit;
static int smtp_write_error = 0;
+static uschar *rcpt_smtp_response;
static uschar *smtp_data_buffer;
static uschar *smtp_cmd_data;
}
va_start(ap, format);
+if (!string_vformat(big_buffer, big_buffer_size, format, ap))
+ {
+ log_write(0, LOG_MAIN|LOG_PANIC, "string too large in smtp_printf()");
+ smtp_closedown(US"Unexpected error");
+ exim_exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+ }
+va_end(ap);
+
+/* If this is the first output for a (non-batch) RCPT command, see if all RCPTs
+have had the same. Note: this code is also present in smtp_respond(). It would
+be tidier to have it only in one place, but when it was added, it was easier to
+do it that way, so as not to have to mess with the code for the RCPT command,
+which sometimes uses smtp_printf() and sometimes smtp_respond(). */
+
+if (rcpt_in_progress)
+ {
+ if (rcpt_smtp_response == NULL)
+ rcpt_smtp_response = string_copy(big_buffer);
+ else if (rcpt_smtp_response_same &&
+ Ustrcmp(rcpt_smtp_response, big_buffer) != 0)
+ rcpt_smtp_response_same = FALSE;
+ rcpt_in_progress = FALSE;
+ }
-/* If in a TLS session we have to format the string, and then write it using a
-TLS function. */
+/* Now write the string */
#ifdef SUPPORT_TLS
if (tls_active >= 0)
{
- if (!string_vformat(big_buffer, big_buffer_size, format, ap))
- {
- log_write(0, LOG_MAIN|LOG_PANIC, "string too large in smtp_printf");
- smtp_closedown(US"Unexpected error");
- exim_exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
- }
if (tls_write(big_buffer, Ustrlen(big_buffer)) < 0) smtp_write_error = -1;
}
else
#endif
-/* Otherwise, just use the standard library function. */
-
-if (vfprintf(smtp_out, format, ap) < 0) smtp_write_error = -1;
-va_end(ap);
+if (fprintf(smtp_out, "%s", big_buffer) < 0) smtp_write_error = -1;
}
message_size = -1;
acl_added_headers = NULL;
queue_only_policy = FALSE;
+rcpt_smtp_response = NULL;
+rcpt_smtp_response_same = TRUE;
+rcpt_in_progress = FALSE;
deliver_freeze = FALSE; /* Can be set by ACL */
freeze_tell = freeze_tell_config; /* Can be set by ACL */
fake_response = OK; /* Can be set by ACL */
esclen = codelen - 4;
}
+/* If this is the first output for a (non-batch) RCPT command, see if all RCPTs
+have had the same. Note: this code is also present in smtp_printf(). It would
+be tidier to have it only in one place, but when it was added, it was easier to
+do it that way, so as not to have to mess with the code for the RCPT command,
+which sometimes uses smtp_printf() and sometimes smtp_respond(). */
+
+if (rcpt_in_progress)
+ {
+ if (rcpt_smtp_response == NULL)
+ rcpt_smtp_response = string_copy(msg);
+ else if (rcpt_smtp_response_same &&
+ Ustrcmp(rcpt_smtp_response, msg) != 0)
+ rcpt_smtp_response_same = FALSE;
+ rcpt_in_progress = FALSE;
+ }
+
+/* Not output the message, splitting it up into multiple lines if necessary. */
+
for (;;)
{
uschar *nl = Ustrchr(msg, '\n');
if (sender_verified_failed != NULL &&
!testflag(sender_verified_failed, af_sverify_told))
{
+ BOOL save_rcpt_in_progress = rcpt_in_progress;
+ rcpt_in_progress = FALSE; /* So as not to treat these as the error */
+
setflag(sender_verified_failed, af_sverify_told);
if (rc != FAIL || (log_extra_selector & LX_sender_verify_fail) != 0)
"Verification failed for <%s>\n%s",
sender_verified_failed->address,
sender_verified_failed->user_message));
+
+ rcpt_in_progress = save_rcpt_in_progress;
}
/* Sort out text for logging */
break;
- /* The RCPT command requires an address as an operand. All we do
- here is to parse it for syntactic correctness. There may be any number
- of RCPT commands, specifying multiple senders. We build them all into
- a data structure that is in argc/argv format. The start/end values
- given by parse_extract_address are not used, as we keep only the
- extracted address. */
+ /* The RCPT command requires an address as an operand. There may be any
+ number of RCPT commands, specifying multiple recipients. We build them all
+ into a data structure. The start/end values given by parse_extract_address
+ are not used, as we keep only the extracted address. */
case RCPT_CMD:
HAD(SCH_RCPT);
rcpt_count++;
- was_rcpt = TRUE;
+ was_rcpt = rcpt_in_progress = TRUE;
/* There must be a sender address; if the sender was rejected and
pipelining was advertised, we assume the client was pipelining, and do not
DATA command.
The example in the pipelining RFC 2920 uses 554, but I use 503 here
- because it is the same whether pipelining is in use or not. */
+ because it is the same whether pipelining is in use or not.
+
+ If all the RCPT commands that precede DATA provoked the same error message
+ (often indicating some kind of system error), it is helpful to include it
+ with the DATA rejection (an idea suggested by Tony Finch). */
case DATA_CMD:
HAD(SCH_DATA);
if (!discarded && recipients_count <= 0)
{
+ if (rcpt_smtp_response_same && rcpt_smtp_response != NULL)
+ {
+ uschar *code = US"503";
+ int len = Ustrlen(rcpt_smtp_response);
+ smtp_respond(code, 3, FALSE, US"All RCPT commands were rejected with "
+ "this error:");
+ /* Responses from smtp_printf() will have \r\n on the end */
+ if (len > 2 && rcpt_smtp_response[len-2] == '\r')
+ rcpt_smtp_response[len-2] = 0;
+ smtp_respond(code, 3, FALSE, rcpt_smtp_response);
+ }
if (pipelining_advertised && last_was_rcpt)
- smtp_printf("503 valid RCPT command must precede DATA\r\n");
+ smtp_printf("503 Valid RCPT command must precede DATA\r\n");
else
done = synprot_error(L_smtp_protocol_error, 503, NULL,
US"valid RCPT command must precede DATA");
projects / exim.git / blobdiff