$av_failed variable set when av_scanner deferred

[exim.git] / src / src / expand.c

diff --git a/src/src/expand.c b/src/src/expand.c
index 2e59c4084e8d16990a31ff851983c5916fff10ec..fb6d6922b551b40bb095f0db678968807c445e38 100644 (file)
--- a/src/src/expand.c
+++ b/src/src/expand.c
@@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
-/* $Cambridge: exim/src/src/expand.c,v 1.108 2010/06/07 08:42:15 pdp Exp $ */
-
 /*************************************************
 *     Exim - an Internet mail transport agent    *
 *************************************************/
@@ -389,6 +387,9 @@ static var_entry var_table[] = {
   { "authenticated_id",    vtype_stringptr,   &authenticated_id },
   { "authenticated_sender",vtype_stringptr,   &authenticated_sender },
   { "authentication_failed",vtype_int,        &authentication_failed },
+#ifdef WITH_CONTENT_SCAN
+  { "av_failed",           vtype_int,         &av_failed },
+#endif
 #ifdef EXPERIMENTAL_BRIGHTMAIL
   { "bmi_alt_location",    vtype_stringptr,   &bmi_alt_location },
   { "bmi_base64_tracker_verdict", vtype_stringptr, &bmi_base64_tracker_verdict },
@@ -3106,6 +3107,32 @@ if (*error == NULL)
     int op = *s++;
     int y = eval_op_unary(&s, decimal, error);
     if (*error != NULL) break;
+    /* SIGFPE both on div/mod by zero and on INT_MIN / -1, which would give
+     * a value of INT_MAX+1. Note that INT_MIN * -1 gives INT_MIN for me, which
+     * is a bug somewhere in [gcc 4.2.1, FreeBSD, amd64].  In fact, -N*-M where
+     * -N*M is INT_MIN will yielf INT_MIN.
+     * Since we don't support floating point, this is somewhat simpler.
+     * Ideally, we'd return an error, but since we overflow for all other
+     * arithmetic, consistency suggests otherwise, but what's the correct value
+     * to use?  There is none.
+     * The C standard guarantees overflow for unsigned arithmetic but signed
+     * overflow invokes undefined behaviour; in practice, this is overflow
+     * except for converting INT_MIN to INT_MAX+1.  We also can't guarantee
+     * that long/longlong larger than int are available, or we could just work
+     * with larger types.  We should consider whether to guarantee 32bit eval
+     * and 64-bit working variables, with errors returned.  For now ...
+     * So, the only SIGFPEs occur with a non-shrinking div/mod, thus -1; we
+     * can just let the other invalid results occur otherwise, as they have
+     * until now.  For this one case, we can coerce.
+     */
+    if (y == -1 && x == INT_MIN && op != '*')
+      {
+      DEBUG(D_expand)
+        debug_printf("Integer exception dodging: %d%c-1 coerced to %d\n",
+            INT_MIN, op, INT_MAX);
+      x = INT_MAX;
+      continue;
+      }
     if (op == '*')
       x *= y;
     else