projects / exim.git / blame
| Commit | Line | Data |
|---|---|---|
| 286b9d5f JH |
1 | # DKIM verify, ed25519 |
| 2 | # | |
| 3 | exim -DSERVER=server -bd -oX PORT_D | |
| 4 | **** | |
| 5 | # | |
| 6 | # This should pass, only Mail::DKIM::Signer does not handle ed25519-sha256 yet | |
| 7 | # | |
| 8 | # Mail original (will be)in aux-fixed/4500.msg1.txt | |
| 321ef002 | 9 | # Sig (would be) generated by: perl aux-fixed/dkim/sign.pl --algorithm=ed255190sha256 \ |
| 286b9d5f JH |
10 | # --method=simple/simple < aux-fixed/4500.msg1.txt |
| 11 | # | |
| 12 | # TODO - until we have that we can only test internal consistency, | |
| 13 | # signing vs. verification. For now, use a message we signed with | |
| 14 | # the Exim GnuTLS implementation (then we can test GnuTLS vs. others) | |
| 15 | # | |
| 16 | client 127.0.0.1 PORT_D | |
| 17 | ??? 220 | |
| 18 | HELO xxx | |
| 19 | ??? 250 | |
| 20 | MAIL FROM:<CALLER@bloggs.com> | |
| 21 | ??? 250 | |
| 22 | RCPT TO:<a@test.ex> | |
| 23 | ??? 250 | |
| 24 | DATA | |
| 25 | ??? 354 | |
| 26 | DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=test.ex | |
| 27 | ; s=sed; h=From:To:Subject; bh=/Ab0giHZitYQbDhFszoqQRUkgqueaX9zatJttIU/plc=; | |
| 28 | b=5fhyD3EILDrnL4DnkD4hDaeis7+GSzL9GMHrhIDZJjuJ00WD5iI8SQ1q9rDfzFL/Kdw0VIyB4R | |
| 29 | Dq0a4H6HI+Bw==; | |
| 30 | Received: from jgh by myhost.test.ex with local (Exim x.yz) | |
| 31 | envelope-from <jgh@myhost.test.ex>) | |
| 32 | 1dtXln-0000YP-Hb | |
| 33 | a@test.ex; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:29:51 +0100 | |
| 34 | From: nobody@example.com | |
| 35 | Message-Id: <E1dtXln-0000YP-Hb@myhost.test.ex> | |
| 36 | Sender: CALLER_NAME <jgh@myhost.test.ex> | |
| 37 | Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:29:51 +0100 | |
| 38 | ||
| 39 | content | |
| 40 | . | |
| 41 | ??? 250 | |
| 42 | QUIT | |
| 43 | ??? 221 | |
| 44 | **** | |
| 45 | # | |
| 46 | # | |
| 321ef002 JH |
47 | # Duplicate of the above, but referencing a pubkey in "wrapped-in-SubjectPublicKeyInfo" |
| 48 | # format. Should pass also. | |
| 49 | client 127.0.0.1 PORT_D | |
| 50 | ??? 220 | |
| 51 | HELO xxx | |
| 52 | ??? 250 | |
| 53 | MAIL FROM:<CALLER@bloggs.com> | |
| 54 | ??? 250 | |
| 55 | RCPT TO:<a@test.ex> | |
| 56 | ??? 250 | |
| 57 | DATA | |
| 58 | ??? 354 | |
| 59 | DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=test.ex | |
| 60 | ; s=sedw; h=From:To:Subject; bh=/Ab0giHZitYQbDhFszoqQRUkgqueaX9zatJttIU/plc=; | |
| 61 | b=g0aVl5sI4fFLWDwXj9SnLgENXg2u8H8kKgK5/bXBZ7DKAImkm2+4tRzz1UOveu/Navis53Bg/C | |
| 62 | 9nPxsspzb/Dg==; | |
| 63 | Received: from jgh by myhost.test.ex with local (Exim x.yz) | |
| 64 | envelope-from <jgh@myhost.test.ex>) | |
| 65 | 1dtXln-0000YP-Hb | |
| 66 | a@test.ex; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:29:51 +0100 | |
| 67 | From: nobody@example.com | |
| 68 | Message-Id: <E1dtXln-0000YP-Hb@myhost.test.ex> | |
| 69 | Sender: CALLER_NAME <jgh@myhost.test.ex> | |
| 70 | Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:29:51 +0100 | |
| 71 | ||
| 72 | content | |
| 73 | . | |
| 74 | ??? 250 | |
| 75 | QUIT | |
| 76 | ??? 221 | |
| 77 | **** | |
| 78 | # | |
| 79 | # | |
| 80 | ||
| 286b9d5f | 81 | # This should pass, an independently-generated sample from Scott Kitterman. |
| 979c462e | 82 | # We use a copied version of his DNS record. |
| 286b9d5f JH |
83 | client 127.0.0.1 PORT_D |
| 84 | ??? 220 | |
| 85 | HELO xxx | |
| 86 | ??? 250 | |
| 87 | MAIL FROM:<CALLER@bloggs.com> | |
| 88 | ??? 250 | |
| 89 | RCPT TO:<a@test.ex> | |
| 90 | ??? 250 | |
| 91 | DATA | |
| 92 | ??? 354 | |
| 93 | DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.org; | |
| 94 | i=@kitterman.org; q=dns/txt; s=ed25519; t=1517847601; | |
| 95 | h=message-id : date : from : to : subject : date : from : | |
| 96 | subject; bh=wE7NXSkgnx9PGiavN4OZhJztvkqPDlemV3OGuEnLwNo=; | |
| 97 | b=sEnnE99Xsjpcqa/cNf8k/KQCEgjJ/4tswIKoNvq2q0fFQL6XBORJ2fQb | |
| 98 | Fvt34Tb4sOxlZtBYu01kEJlmGz4uCw== | |
| 99 | Authentication-Results: lists.example.org; arc=none; spf=pass smtp.mfrom=example.com; dmarc=pass | |
| 100 | Received: from localhost | |
| 101 | Message-ID: <example@example.com> | |
| 102 | Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2011 01:02:03 +0400 | |
| 103 | From: Test User <test@example.com> | |
| 104 | To: somebody@example.com | |
| 105 | Subject: Testing | |
| 106 | ||
| 107 | This is a test message. | |
| 108 | . | |
| 109 | ??? 250 | |
| 110 | QUIT | |
| 111 | ??? 221 | |
| 112 | **** | |
| 113 | # | |
| 114 | killdaemon | |
| be24b950 JH |
115 | # |
| 116 | # | |
| 117 | # | |
| 118 | # | |
| 119 | # This should fail because the signing pubkey is too small. | |
| 120 | exim -DSERVER=server -DMSIZE='rsa=1024 ed25519=300' -bd -oX PORT_D | |
| 121 | **** | |
| 122 | # | |
| 123 | # Duplicate test input to the first one, above. | |
| 124 | # | |
| 125 | client 127.0.0.1 PORT_D | |
| 126 | ??? 220 | |
| 127 | HELO xxx | |
| 128 | ??? 250 | |
| 129 | MAIL FROM:<CALLER@bloggs.com> | |
| 130 | ??? 250 | |
| 131 | RCPT TO:<a@test.ex> | |
| 132 | ??? 250 | |
| 133 | DATA | |
| 134 | ??? 354 | |
| 135 | DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=test.ex | |
| 136 | ; s=sed; h=From:To:Subject; bh=/Ab0giHZitYQbDhFszoqQRUkgqueaX9zatJttIU/plc=; | |
| 137 | b=5fhyD3EILDrnL4DnkD4hDaeis7+GSzL9GMHrhIDZJjuJ00WD5iI8SQ1q9rDfzFL/Kdw0VIyB4R | |
| 138 | Dq0a4H6HI+Bw==; | |
| 139 | Received: from jgh by myhost.test.ex with local (Exim x.yz) | |
| 140 | envelope-from <jgh@myhost.test.ex>) | |
| 141 | 1dtXln-0000YP-Hb | |
| 142 | a@test.ex; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:29:51 +0100 | |
| 143 | From: nobody@example.com | |
| 144 | Message-Id: <E1dtXln-0000YP-Hb@myhost.test.ex> | |
| 145 | Sender: CALLER_NAME <jgh@myhost.test.ex> | |
| 146 | Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:29:51 +0100 | |
| 147 | ||
| 148 | content | |
| 149 | . | |
| 150 | ??? 250 | |
| 151 | QUIT | |
| 152 | ??? 221 | |
| 153 | **** | |
| 154 | killdaemon | |
| 155 | # | |
| 286b9d5f JH |
156 | no_stdout_check |
| 157 | no_msglog_check |