Commit | Line | Data |
---|---|---|
495ae4b0 PH |
1 | ## $Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-src/FAQ.src,v 1.1 2004/10/07 15:04:35 ph10 Exp $ |
2 | ## | |
3 | ## This file is processed by Perl scripts to produce an ASCII and an HTML | |
4 | ## version. Lines starting with ## are omitted. The markup used with paragraphs | |
5 | ## is as follows: | |
6 | ## | |
7 | ## Markup User for HTML Text | |
8 | ## ------------------------------------------------------ | |
9 | ## \...\ option fixed-pitch "quoted" | |
10 | ## \$...$\ variable $italic $plain | |
11 | ## \*...*\ titles, quotes italic "quoted" | |
12 | ## \(...)\ file name italic plain | |
13 | ## \[...]\ replaceable <italic> <plain> | |
14 | ## \?...?\ URL URL plain | |
15 | ## \^...^\ Unix command italic plain | |
16 | ## \%...%\ Exim driver bold "quoted" | |
17 | ## \^^.^^\ C function bold plain | |
18 | ## ::...:: header name italic: plain: | |
19 | ## //...// domain italic plain | |
20 | ## \/.../\ local part italic plain | |
21 | ## \"..."\ literal fixed-pitch "quoted" | |
22 | ## \\...\\ SMTP, build small caps caps | |
23 | ## \**...**\ warn, item bold plain | |
24 | ## \-...-\ cmd option -italic -plain | |
25 | ## \# hard space space | |
26 | ## | |
27 | ## ``...'' quoted string “...” "..." | |
28 | ## | |
29 | ## @\ is used when a real backslash is required | |
30 | ## | |
31 | ## In addition, sequences of not blank lines that start with ==> are displayed | |
32 | ## in fixed-pitch with no further interpretation. A line containing only [[br]] | |
33 | ## is removed from the text version, but turned into <br> in the HTML version. | |
34 | ## | |
35 | ## The starts of sections and of questions and answers are automatically | |
36 | ## detected by the scripts. | |
37 | ## | |
38 | ## | |
39 | THE EXIM FAQ | |
40 | ------------ | |
41 | ||
42 | This is the FAQ for the Exim Mail Transfer Agent. Many thanks to the many | |
43 | people who provided the original information. This file would be amazingly | |
44 | cluttered if I tried to list them all. Suggestions for corrections, | |
45 | improvements, and additions are always welcome. | |
46 | ||
47 | This version of the FAQ applies to Exim 4.00 and later releases. It has been | |
48 | extensively revised, and material that was relevant only to earlier releases | |
49 | has been removed. As this caused some whole sections to disappear, I've taken | |
50 | the opportunity to re-arrange the sections and renumber everything except the | |
51 | configuration samples. | |
52 | ||
53 | References of the form Cnnn, Fnnn, Lnnn, and Snnn are to the sample | |
54 | configuration, filter, \^^local_scan()^^\, and ``useful script'' files. These | |
55 | are hyperlinked from the HTML version of this FAQ. They can also be found in | |
56 | the separately distributed directory called \(config.samples)\. The primary | |
57 | location is | |
58 | ||
59 | \?ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/email/exim/exim4/config.samples.tar.gz?\ | |
60 | \?ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/email/exim/exim4/config.samples.tar.bz2?\ | |
61 | ||
62 | There are brief descriptions of these files at the end of this document. | |
63 | ||
64 | Philip Hazel | |
65 | Last update: 31-March-2004 | |
66 | ||
67 | ||
68 | The FAQ is divided into the following sections: | |
69 | ||
70 | 0. General Debugging | |
71 | 1. Building and Installing | |
72 | 2. Routing in general | |
73 | 3. Routing to remote hosts | |
74 | 4. Routing for local delivery | |
75 | 5. Filtering | |
76 | 6. Delivery | |
77 | 7. Policy controls | |
78 | 8. Rewriting addresses | |
79 | 9. Headers | |
80 | 10. Performance | |
81 | 11. Majordomo | |
82 | 12. Fetchmail | |
83 | 13. Perl | |
84 | 14. Dial-up and ISDN | |
85 | 15. UUCP | |
86 | 16. Modifying message bodies | |
87 | 17. Encryption (TLS/SSL) | |
88 | 20. Millennium | |
89 | 50. Miscellaneous | |
90 | 91. Mac OS X | |
91 | 92. FreeBSD | |
92 | 93. HP-UX | |
93 | 94. BSDI | |
94 | 95. IRIX | |
95 | 96. Linux | |
96 | 97. Sun sytems | |
97 | 98. Configuration cookbook | |
98 | 99. List of sample configurations | |
99 | ||
100 | ||
101 | ||
102 | 0. GENERAL DEBUGGING | |
103 | ||
104 | Q0001: Exim is crashing. What is wrong? | |
105 | ||
106 | A0001: Exim should never crash. The author is always keen to know about | |
107 | crashes, so that they can be diagnosed and fixed. However, before you | |
108 | start sending me email, please check that you are running the latest | |
109 | release of Exim, in case the problem has already been fixed. The | |
110 | techniques described below can also be useful in trying to pin down | |
111 | exactly which circumstances caused the crash and what Exim was trying to | |
112 | do at the time. If the crash is reproducable (by a particular message, | |
113 | say) keep a copy of that message. | |
114 | ||
115 | ||
116 | Q0002: Exim is not working. What is wrong? How can I check what it is doing? | |
117 | ||
118 | A0002: Exactly how is it not working? Check the more specific questions in the | |
119 | other sections of this FAQ. Some general techniques for debugging are: | |
120 | ||
121 | (1) Look for information in Exim's log files. These are in the \(log)\ | |
122 | directory in Exim's spool directory, unless you have configured a | |
123 | different path for them. Serious operational problems are reported | |
124 | in paniclog. | |
125 | ||
126 | (2) If the problem involves the delivery of one or more messages, try | |
127 | forcing a delivery with the \-M-\ option and also set the \-d-\ | |
128 | option, to cause Exim to output debugging information. For example: | |
129 | ||
130 | ==> exim -d -M 0z6CXU-0005RR-00 | |
131 | ||
132 | The output is written to the standard error stream. You need to have | |
133 | admin privileges to use \-M-\ and \-d-\. | |
134 | ||
135 | (3) If the problem involves incoming SMTP mail, try using the \-bh-\ | |
136 | option to simulate an incoming connection from a specific host, | |
137 | for example: | |
138 | ||
139 | ==> exim -bh 10.9.8.7 | |
140 | ||
141 | This goes through the motions of an SMTP session, without actually | |
142 | accepting a message. Information about various policy checks is | |
143 | output. You will need to know how to pretend to be an SMTP client. | |
144 | ||
145 | (4) If the problem involves lack of recognition or incorrect handling | |
146 | of local addresses, try using the \-bt-\ option with debugging turned | |
147 | on, to see how Exim is handling the address. For example, | |
148 | ||
149 | ==> exim -d -bt z6abc | |
150 | ||
151 | shows you how it would handle the local part \"z6abc"\. | |
152 | ||
153 | ||
154 | Q0003: What does the error \*Child process of address_pipe transport returned | |
155 | 69 from command xxx*\ mean? | |
156 | ||
157 | A0003: It means that when a transport called \%address_pipe%\ was run to pass an | |
158 | email message by means of a pipe to another process running the command | |
159 | xxx, the return code from that command was 69, which indicates some kind | |
160 | of error (the success return code is 0). | |
161 | ||
162 | The most common meaning of exit code 69 is ``unavailable'', and this often | |
163 | means that when Exim tried to run the command \(xxx)\, it failed. One | |
164 | cause of this might be incorrect permissions on the file containing the | |
165 | command. See also Q0026. | |
166 | ||
167 | ||
168 | Q0004: My virtual domain setup isn't working. How can I debug it? | |
169 | ||
170 | A0004: You can use an exim command with \-d-\ to get it to show you how it is | |
171 | processing addresses. You don't actually need to send a message; use the | |
172 | \-bt-\ option like this: | |
173 | ||
174 | ==> exim -d -bt localpart@virtualhost | |
175 | ||
176 | This will show you which routers it is using. If the problem appears | |
177 | to be with the expansion of an option setting, you can use the | |
178 | \debug_print\ option on a router to get Exim to output the expanded | |
179 | string values as it goes along. | |
180 | ||
181 | ||
182 | Q0005: Why is Exim not rejecting incoming messages addressed to non-existent | |
183 | users at SMTP time? | |
184 | ||
185 | A0005: This is controlled by the ACL that is run for each incoming RCPT | |
186 | command. It is defined by the \acl_smtp_rcpt\ option. You can check this | |
187 | part of your configuration by using the \-bh-\ option to run a simulated | |
188 | SMTP session, during which Exim will tell you what things it is | |
189 | checking. | |
190 | ||
191 | ||
192 | Q0006: I've put an entry for \"*.my.domain"\ in a DBM lookup file, but it isn't | |
193 | getting recognized. | |
194 | ||
195 | A0006: You need to request ``partial matching'' by setting the search type to | |
196 | \partial-dbm\ in order for this to work. | |
197 | ||
198 | ||
199 | Q0007: I've put the entry \"*@domain.com"\ in a lookup database, but it isn't | |
200 | working. The expansion I'm using is: | |
201 | ||
202 | ==> ${lookup{${lc:$sender_address}}dbm{/the/file} ... | |
203 | ||
204 | A0007: As no sender address will ever be //*@domain.com// this will indeed have | |
205 | no effect as it stands. You need to tell Exim that you want it to look | |
206 | for defaults after the normal lookup has failed. In this case, change the | |
207 | search type from \"dbm"\ to \"dbm*@"\. See the section on \*Default values in | |
208 | single-key lookups*\ in the chapter entitled \*File and database | |
209 | lookups*\ in the Exim manual. | |
210 | ||
211 | ||
212 | Q0008: If I run \"./exim -d -bt user@domain"\ all seems well, but when I send | |
213 | a message from my User Agent, it does not arrive at its destination. | |
214 | ||
215 | A0008: Try sending a message directly to Exim by typing this: | |
216 | ||
217 | ==> exim -v user@domain | |
218 | <some message, could be empty> | |
219 | . | |
220 | ||
221 | If the message gets delivered to a remote host, but never arrives at its | |
222 | final destination, then the problem is at the remote host. If, however, | |
223 | the message gets through correctly, then the problem may be between your | |
224 | User Agent and Exim. Try setting Exim's \log_selector\ option to include | |
225 | \"+arguments"\, to see with which arguments the UA is calling Exim. | |
226 | ||
227 | ||
228 | Q0009: What does \*no immediate delivery: too many messages received in one SMTP | |
229 | connection*\ mean? | |
230 | ||
231 | A0009: An SMTP client may send any number of messages down a single SMTP | |
232 | connection to a server. Initially, an Exim server starts up a delivery | |
233 | process as soon as a message is received. However, in order not to start | |
234 | up too many processes when lots of messages are arriving (typically | |
235 | after a period of downtime), it stops doing immediate delivery after a | |
236 | certain number of messages have arrived down the same connection. The | |
237 | threshold is set by \smtp_accept_queue_per_connection\, and the default | |
238 | value is 10. On large systems, the value should be increased. If you are | |
239 | running a dial-in host and expecting to get all your mail down a single | |
240 | SMTP connection, then you can disable the limit altogether by setting | |
241 | the value to zero. | |
242 | ||
243 | ||
244 | Q0010: Exim puts \*for \[address]\*\ in the ::Received:: headers of some, but not all, | |
245 | messages. Is this a bug? | |
246 | ||
247 | A0010: No. It is deliberate. Exim inserts a ``for'' phrase only if the incoming | |
248 | message has precisely one recipient. If there is more than one | |
249 | recipient, nothing is inserted. The reason for this is that not all | |
250 | recipients appear in the ::To:: or ::Cc:: headers, and it is considered a | |
251 | breach of privacy to expose such recipients to the others. A common | |
252 | case is when a message has come from a mailing list. | |
253 | ||
254 | ||
255 | Q0011: Instead of \^exim_dbmbuild^\, I'm using a homegrown program to build DBM | |
256 | (or cdb) files, but Exim doesn't seem to be able to use them. | |
257 | ||
258 | A0011: Exim expects there to be a binary zero value on the end of each key used | |
259 | in a DBM file if you use the \"dbm"\ lookup type, but not for the \"dbmnz"\ | |
260 | lookup type or for the keys of a cdb file. Check that you haven't | |
261 | slipped up in this regard. | |
262 | ||
263 | ||
264 | Q0012: Exim is unable to route to any remote domains. It doesn't seen to be | |
265 | able to access the DNS. | |
266 | ||
267 | A0012: Try running \"exim -d+resolver -bt \[remote address]\"\. The \-d-\ | |
268 | options turns on debugging output, and the addition of \"+resolver"\ | |
269 | will make it show the resolver queries it is building and the results of | |
270 | its DNS queries. If it appears unable to contact any name servers, check | |
271 | the contents and permissions of \(/etc/resolv.conf)\. | |
272 | ||
273 | ||
274 | Q0013: What does the error message \*transport system_aliases: cannot find | |
275 | transport driver "redirect" in line 92*\ mean? | |
276 | ||
277 | A0013: \%redirect%\ is a router, not a transport. You have put a configuration | |
278 | for a router into the transports section of the configuration file. | |
279 | ||
280 | ||
281 | Q0014: Exim is timing out after receiving and responding to the DATA command | |
282 | from one particular host, and yet the client host also claims to be | |
283 | timing out. This seems to affect only certain messages. | |
284 | ||
285 | A0014: This kind of problem can have many different causes. | |
286 | ||
287 | (1) This problem has been seen with a network that was dropping all | |
288 | packets over a certain size, which mean that the first part of the SMTP | |
289 | transaction worked, but when the body of a large message started | |
290 | flowing, the main data bits never got through the network. See also | |
291 | Q0017. | |
292 | ||
293 | (2) This can also happen if a host has a broken TCP stack and won't | |
294 | reassemble fragmented datagrams. | |
295 | ||
296 | (3) A very few ISDN lines have been seen which failed when certain data | |
297 | patterns were sent through them, and replacing the routers at both end | |
298 | of the link did not fix things. One of them was triggered by more than 4 | |
299 | X's in a row in the data. | |
300 | ||
301 | ||
302 | Q0015: What does the message \*Socket bind() to port 25 for address (any) | |
303 | failed: address already in use*\ mean? | |
304 | ||
305 | A0015: You are trying to run an Exim daemon when there is one already running - | |
306 | or maybe some other MTA is running, or perhaps you have an SMTP line in | |
307 | \(/etc/inetd.conf)\ which is causing \(inetd)\ to listen on port 25. | |
308 | ||
309 | ||
310 | Q0016: I've set \"verify = header_syntax"\ in my ACL, but this causes Exim to | |
311 | complain about header lines like \"To: Work: Jim <jims@email>, | |
312 | Home: Bob <bobs@email>"\ which look all right to me. Is this a bug? | |
313 | ||
314 | A0016: No. Header lines such as ::From::, ::To::, etc., which contain addresses, are | |
315 | structured, and have to be in a specific format which is defined in RFC | |
316 | 2822. Unquoted colons are not allowed in the ``phrase'' part of an email | |
317 | address (they are OK in other headers such as ::Subject::). The correct | |
318 | form for that header is | |
319 | ||
320 | ==> To: "Work: Jim" <jims@email>, "Home: Bob" <bobs@email> | |
321 | ||
322 | You will sometimes see unquoted colons in ::To:: and ::Cc:: headers, but only | |
323 | in connection with name lists (called ``groups''), for example: | |
324 | ||
325 | ==> To: My friends: X <x@y.x>, Y <y@w.z>;, | |
326 | My enemies: A <a@b.c>, B <b@c.d>; | |
327 | ||
328 | Each list must be terminated by a semicolon, as shown. | |
329 | ||
330 | ||
331 | Q0017: Whenever Exim tries to deliver a specific message to a particular | |
332 | server, it fails, giving the error \*Remote end closed connection after | |
333 | data*\ or \*Broken pipe*\ or a timeout. What's going on? | |
334 | ||
335 | A0017: \*Broken pipe*\ is the error you get on some OS when the remote host just | |
336 | drops the connection. The alternative is \*connection reset by peer*\. | |
337 | There are many potential causes. Here are some of them (see also Q0068): | |
338 | ||
339 | (1) There are some firewalls that fall over on binary zero characters | |
340 | in email. Have a look, e.g. with \"hexdump -c mymail | tail"\ to see if | |
341 | your mail contains any binary zero characters. | |
342 | ||
343 | (2) There are broken SMTP servers around that just drop the connection | |
344 | after the data has been sent if they don't like the message for some | |
345 | reason (e.g. it is too big) instead of sending a 5xx error code. Have | |
346 | you tried sending a small message to the same address? | |
347 | ||
348 | It has been reported that some releases of Novell servers running NIMS | |
349 | are unable to handle lines longer than 1024 characters, and just close | |
350 | the connection. This is an example of this behaviour. | |
351 | ||
352 | (3) If the problem occurs right at the start of the mail, then it could | |
353 | be a network problem with mishandling of large packets. Many emails are | |
354 | small and thus appear to propagate correctly, but big emails will | |
355 | generate big IP datagrams. | |
356 | ||
357 | There have been problems when something in the middle of the network | |
358 | mishandles large packets due to IP tunnelling. In a tunnelled link, your | |
359 | IP datagrams gets wrapped in a larger datagram and sent over a network. | |
360 | This is how virtual private networks (VPNs), and some ISP transit | |
361 | circuits work. Since the datagrams going over the tunnel require a | |
362 | larger packet size, the tunnel needs a bigger maximum transfer unit | |
363 | (MTU) in the network handling the tunnelled packets. However, MTUs | |
364 | are often fixed, so the tunnel will try to fragment the packets. | |
365 | ||
366 | If the systems outside the tunnel are using path MTU discovery, (most | |
367 | Sun Sparc Solaris machines do by default), and set the DF (don't | |
368 | fragment) bit because they don't send packets larger than their \(local)\ | |
369 | MTU, then ICMP control messages will be sent by the routers at the | |
370 | ends of the tunnel to tell them to reduce their MTU, since the tunnel | |
371 | can't fragment the data, and has to throw it away. If this mechanism | |
372 | stops working, e.g. a firewall blocks ICMP, then your host never | |
373 | knows it has hit the maximum path MTU, but it has received no ACK on | |
374 | the packet either, so it continues to resend the same packet and the | |
375 | connection stalls, eventually timing out. | |
376 | ||
377 | You can test the link using pings of large packets and see what works: | |
378 | ||
379 | ==> ping -s host 2048 | |
380 | ||
381 | Try reducing the MTU on the sending host: | |
382 | ||
383 | ==> ifconfig le0 mtu 1300 | |
384 | ||
385 | Alternatively, you can reduce the size of the buffer Exim uses for SMTP | |
386 | output by putting something like | |
387 | ||
388 | ==> DELIVER_OUT_BUFFER_SIZE=512 | |
389 | ||
390 | in your \(Local/Makefile)\ and rebuilding Exim (the default is 8192). | |
391 | While this should not in principle have any effect on the size of | |
392 | packets sent, in practice it does seem to have an effect on some OS. | |
393 | ||
394 | You can also try disabling path MTU discovery on the sending host. On | |
395 | Linux, try: | |
396 | ||
397 | ==> echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_no_pmtu_disc | |
398 | ||
399 | For a general discussion and information about other operating systems, see | |
400 | \?http://www.netheaven.com/pmtu.html?\. If disabling path MTU discovery | |
401 | fixes the problem, try to find the broken or misconfigured | |
402 | router/firewall that swallows the ICMP-unreachable packets. Increasing | |
403 | timeouts on the receiving host will not work around the problem. | |
404 | ||
405 | ||
406 | Q0018: Why do messages not get delivered down the same connection when I do | |
407 | something like: \"exim -v -R @aol.com"\? For other domains, I do this and | |
408 | I see the appropriate \*waiting for passed connections to get used*\ | |
409 | messages. | |
410 | ||
411 | A0018: Recall that Exim does not keep separate queues for each domain, but | |
412 | operates in a distributed fashion. Messages get into its `waiting for | |
413 | host x' hints database only when a delivery has been tried, and has had | |
414 | a temporary error. Here are some possibilities: | |
415 | ||
416 | (1) The messages to \(aol.com)\ got put in your queue, but no previous | |
417 | delivery attempt occured before you did the \-R-\. This might have been | |
418 | because of your settings of \queue_only_load\, \smtp_accept_queue\, or any | |
419 | other option that caused no immediate delivery attempt on arrival. If | |
420 | this is the case, you can try using \-qqR-\ instead of \-R-\. | |
421 | ||
422 | (2) You have set \connection_max_messages\ on the smtp transport, and | |
423 | that limit was reached. This would show as a sequence of messages | |
424 | down one connection, then another sequence down a new connection, etc. | |
425 | ||
426 | (3) Exim tried to pass on the SMTP connection to another message, but | |
427 | that message was in the process of being delivered to \(aol.com)\ by some | |
428 | other process (typically, a normal queue runner). This will break the | |
429 | sequence, though the other delivery should pass its connection on to | |
430 | other messages if there are any. | |
431 | ||
432 | (4) The folk at \(aol.com)\ changed the MX records so the host names have | |
433 | changed - or a new host has been added. I don't know how likely this is. | |
434 | ||
435 | (5) Exim is not performing as it should in this regard, for some reason. | |
436 | Next time you have mail queued up for \(aol.com)\, try running | |
437 | ||
438 | ==> exim_dumpdb /var/spool/exim wait-remote_smtp | |
439 | ||
440 | to see if those messages are listed among those waiting for the relevant | |
441 | \(aol.com)\ hosts. | |
442 | ||
443 | ||
444 | Q0019: There seems to be a problem in the string expansion code: it doesn't | |
445 | recognize references to headers such as \"${h_to}"\. | |
446 | ||
447 | A0019: The only valid syntax for header references is (for example) \"$h_to:"\ | |
448 | because header names are permitted by RFC 2822 to contain a very wide | |
449 | range of characters. A colon (or white space) is required as the | |
450 | terminator. | |
451 | ||
452 | ||
453 | Q0020: Why do connections to my machine's SMTP port take a long time to respond | |
454 | with the banner, when connections to other ports respond instantly? The | |
455 | delay is sometimes as long as 30 seconds. | |
456 | ||
457 | A0020: These kinds of delay are usually caused by some kind of network problem | |
458 | that affects outgoing calls made by Exim at the start of an incoming | |
459 | connection. Configuration options that cause outgoing calls are: | |
460 | ||
461 | (1) \rfc1413_hosts\ and \rfc1413_query_timeout\ (for \*ident*\ calls). | |
462 | Firewalls sometimes block ident connections so that they time out, | |
463 | instead of refusing them immediately. This can cause this problem. | |
464 | See Q5023 for a discussion of the usefulness of \*ident*\. | |
465 | ||
466 | (2) The \host_lookup\ option, the \host_reject_connection\ option, or a | |
467 | condition in the ACL that runs at connection time requires the | |
468 | remote host's name to be looked up from its IP address. Sometimes | |
469 | these DNS lookups time out. You can get this effect with ACL | |
470 | statements like this: | |
471 | ||
472 | ==> deny hosts = *.x.example | |
473 | ||
474 | If at all possible, you should use IP addresses instead of host | |
475 | names in blocking lists in order to to avoid this problem. | |
476 | ||
477 | You can use the \-bh-\ option to get more information about what is | |
478 | happening at the start of a connection. However, note that the \-bh-\ | |
479 | option does not provide a complete simulation. In particular, no | |
480 | \*ident*\ checks are done, so it won't show up a delay problem that is | |
481 | related to (1) above. | |
482 | ||
483 | ||
484 | Q0021: What does \*failed to create child process to send failure message*\ mean? | |
485 | This is a busy mail server with \smtp_accept_max\ set to 500, but this | |
486 | problem started to occur at about 300 incoming connections. | |
487 | ||
488 | A0021: Some message delivery failed, and when Exim wanted to send a bounce | |
489 | message, it was unable to create a process in which to do so. Probably | |
490 | the limit on the maximum number of simultaneously active processes has | |
491 | been reached. Most OS have some means of increasing this limit, and in | |
492 | some operating systems there is also a limit per uid which can be | |
493 | varied. | |
494 | ||
495 | ||
496 | Q0022: What does \*No transport set by system filter*\ in a log line mean? | |
497 | ||
498 | A0022: Your system filter contains a \"pipe"\ or \"save"\ or \"mail"\ command, | |
499 | but you have not set the corresponding option which specifies which | |
500 | transport is to be used. You need to set whichever of | |
501 | \system_filter_pipe_transport\, \system_filter_file_transport\ or | |
502 | \system_filter_reply_transport\ is relevant. | |
503 | ||
504 | ||
505 | Q0023: Why is Exim refusing to relay, saying \*failed to find host name from IP | |
506 | address*\ when I have the sender's IP address in an ACL condition? My | |
507 | configuration contains this ACL statement: | |
508 | ||
509 | ==> accept hosts = lsearch;/etc/mail/relaydomains:192.168.96.0/24 | |
510 | ||
511 | A0023: When checking a host list, the items are tested in left-to-right | |
512 | order. The first item in your list is a lookup on the incoming host's | |
513 | name, so Exim has to determine the name from the incoming IP address in | |
514 | order to perform the test. If it can't find the host name, it can't do | |
515 | the check, so it gives up. You would have discovered what was going | |
516 | on if you had run a test such as | |
517 | ||
518 | ==> exim -bh 192.168.96.131 | |
519 | ||
520 | The solution is to put all explicit IP addresses first in the list. | |
521 | Alternatively, you can split the ACL statement into two like this: | |
522 | ||
523 | ==> accept hosts = lsearch;/etc/mail/relaydomains | |
524 | accept hosts = 192.168.96.0/24 | |
525 | ||
526 | If the host lookup fails, the first \"accept"\ fails, but then the | |
527 | second one is considered. | |
528 | ||
529 | ||
530 | Q0024: When I run \"exim -bd -q10m"\ I get \*PANIC LOG: exec of exim -q failed*\. | |
531 | ||
532 | A0024: This probably means that Exim doesn't know its own path so it can't | |
533 | re-exec itself to do the first queue run. Check the output of | |
534 | ||
535 | ==> exim -bP exim_path | |
536 | ||
537 | ||
538 | Q0025: I can't seem to get a pipe command to run when I include a \"${if"\ | |
539 | expansion in it. This fails: | |
540 | ||
541 | ==> command = perl -T /usr/local/rt/bin/rtmux.pl \ | |
542 | rt-mailgate helpdesk \ | |
543 | ${if eq {$local_part}{rt} {correspond}{action}} | |
544 | ||
545 | A0025: You need some internal quoting in there. Exim expands each individual | |
546 | argument separately. Because you have (necessarily) got spaces in your | |
547 | \"${if"\ item, you have to quote that argument. Try | |
548 | ||
549 | ==> command = perl -T /usr/local/rt/bin/rtmux.pl \ | |
550 | rt-mailgate helpdesk \ | |
551 | "${if eq {$local_part}{rt} {correspond}{action}}" | |
552 | ||
553 | \**Warning:**\ If command starts with an item that requires quoting, | |
554 | you cannot just put it in quotes, because a leading quote means that the | |
555 | entire option setting is being quoted. What you have to do is to quote | |
556 | the entire value, and use internally escaped quotes for the ones you | |
557 | really want. For example: | |
558 | ||
559 | ==> command = "\"${if ....}\" arg1 arg2" | |
560 | ||
561 | Any backslashes in the expansion items will have to be doubled to stop | |
562 | them being interpreted by the string reader. | |
563 | ||
564 | ||
565 | Q0026: I'm trying to get Exim to connect an alias to a pipe, but it always | |
566 | gives error code 69, with the comment \*(could mean service or program | |
567 | unavailable)*\. | |
568 | ||
569 | A0026: If your alias entry looks like this: | |
570 | ||
571 | ==> alias: |"/some/command some parameters" | |
572 | ||
573 | change it to look like this: | |
574 | ||
575 | ==> alias: "|/some/command some parameters" | |
576 | ||
577 | ||
578 | Q0027: What does the error \*Spool file is locked*\ mean? | |
579 | ||
580 | A0027: This is not an error. All it means is that when an Exim delivery | |
581 | process (probably started by a queue runner process) looked at a message | |
582 | in order to start delivering it, it found that another Exim process was | |
583 | already busy delivering it. On a busy system this is quite a common | |
584 | occurrence. If you set \"-skip_delivery"\ in the \log_selector\ option, | |
585 | these messages are omitted from the log. | |
586 | ||
587 | The only time when this message might indicate a problem is if it is | |
588 | repeated for the same message for a very long time. That would suggest | |
589 | that the process that is delivering the message has somehow got stuck. | |
590 | ||
591 | ||
592 | Q0028: Exim is reporting IP addresses as 0.0.0.0 or 255.255.255.255 instead of | |
593 | their correct values. What's going on? | |
594 | ||
595 | A0028: You are using a version of Exim built with gcc on an IRIX box. | |
596 | See Q9502. | |
597 | ||
598 | ||
599 | Q0029: I can't seem to figure out why PAM support doesn't work correctly. | |
600 | ||
601 | A0029: There is a problem using PAM with shadow passwords when the calling | |
602 | program is not running as \/root/\. Exim is normally running as the | |
603 | Exim user when authenticating a remote host. See this posting for one | |
604 | way round the problem: | |
605 | ||
606 | \?http://www.exim.org/mailman/htdig/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20010917/030371.html?\ | |
607 | ||
608 | Another solution can be found at \?http://www.e-admin.de/pam_exim/?\. | |
609 | ||
610 | PAM 0.72 allows authorization as non-\/root/\, using setuid helper programs. | |
611 | Furthermore, in \(/etc/pam.d/exim)\ you can explicitelly specify that | |
612 | this authorization (using setuid helpers) is only permitted for certain | |
613 | users and groups. | |
614 | ||
615 | ||
616 | Q0030: I'm trying to use a query-style lookup for hosts that are allowed to | |
617 | relay, but it is giving really weird errors. | |
618 | ||
619 | A0030: Does your query contain a colon character? Remember that host lists are | |
620 | colon-separated, so you need to double any colons in the query. This | |
621 | applies even if the query is defined as a macro. | |
622 | ||
623 | ||
624 | Q0031: Exim is rejecting connections from hosts that have more than one IP | |
625 | address, for no apparent reason. | |
626 | ||
627 | A0031: You are using Solaris 7 or earlier, and have \"nis dns files"\ in | |
628 | \(/etc/nsswitch.conf)\. Change this to \"dns nis files"\ to avoid hitting Sun | |
629 | bug 1154236 (a bad interaction between NIS and the DNS). | |
630 | ||
631 | ||
632 | Q0032: Exim is failing to find the MySQL library, even though is it present | |
633 | within \\LD_LIBRARY_PATH\\. I'm getting this error: | |
634 | ||
635 | ==> /usr/local/bin/exim: fatal: libmysqlclient.so.6: open failed: | |
636 | No such file or directory | |
637 | ||
638 | A0032: Exim is suid, and \\LD_LIBRARY_PATH\\ is ignored for suid binaries on a | |
639 | Solaris (and other?) systems. What you should be doing is adding | |
640 | \"-R/local/lib/mysql"\ to the same place in the compilation that you added | |
641 | \"-L/local/lib/mysql"\. This tells the binary where to look without | |
642 | needing a path variable. | |
643 | ||
644 | ||
645 | Q0033: What does the error \*lookup of host "xx.xx.xx" failed in yyy router*\ | |
646 | mean? | |
647 | ||
648 | A0033: You configured a \%manualroute%\ router to send the message to xx.xx.xx. When | |
649 | it tried to look up the IP address for that host, the lookup failed | |
650 | with a permanent error. As this is a manual routing, this is a | |
651 | considered to be a serious error which the postmaster needs to know | |
652 | about (maybe you have a typo in your file), and there is little point | |
653 | in keeping on trying. So it freezes the message. | |
654 | ||
655 | (1) Don't set up routes to non-existent hosts. | |
656 | ||
657 | (2) If you must set up routes to non-existent hosts, and don't want | |
658 | freezing, set the \host_find_failed\ option on the router to do something | |
659 | other than freeze. | |
660 | ||
661 | ||
662 | Q0034: Exim works fine on one host, but when I copied the binary to another | |
663 | identical host, it stopped working (it could not resolve DNS names). | |
664 | ||
665 | A0034: Is the new host running exactly the same operating system? Most | |
666 | importantly, are the versions of the dynamically loaded libraries | |
667 | (files with names like \(libsocket.so.1)\) the same on both systems? If not, | |
668 | that is probably the cause of the problem. Either arrange for the | |
669 | libraries to be the same, or rebuild Exim from source on the new host. | |
670 | ||
671 | ||
672 | Q0035: I set a \"hosts"\ condition in an ACL to do a lookup in a file of IP | |
673 | addresses, but it doesn't work. | |
674 | ||
675 | A0035: Did you remember to put \"net-"\ at the start of the the search type? If | |
676 | you set something like this: | |
677 | ||
678 | ==> accept hosts = lsearch;/some/file | |
679 | ||
680 | Exim searches the file for the host name, not the IP address. You need | |
681 | to set | |
682 | ||
683 | ==> accept hosts = net-lsearch;/some/file | |
684 | ||
685 | to make it use the IP address as the key to the lookup. | |
686 | ||
687 | ||
688 | Q0036: Why do I get the error \*Permission denied: creating lock file hitching | |
689 | post*\ when Exim tries to do a local delivery? | |
690 | ||
691 | A0036: Your configuration specifies that local mailboxes are all held in | |
692 | single directory, via configuration lines like these (taken from the | |
693 | default configuration): | |
694 | ||
695 | ==> local_delivery: | |
696 | driver = appendfile | |
697 | file = /var/mail/$local_part | |
698 | ||
699 | and the permissions on the directory probably look like this: | |
700 | ||
701 | ==> drwxrwxr-x 3 root mail 512 Jul 9 13:48 /var/mail/ | |
702 | ||
703 | Using the default configuration, Exim runs as the local user when doing | |
704 | a local delivery, and it uses a lock file to prevent any other process | |
705 | from updating the mailbox while it is writing to it. With those | |
706 | permissions the delivery process, running as the user, is unable to | |
707 | create a lock file in the \(/var/mail(\ directory. There are two solutions | |
708 | to this problem: | |
709 | ||
710 | (1) Set the \"write"\ and \"sticky bit"\ permissions on the directory, so | |
711 | that it looks like this: | |
712 | ||
713 | ==> drwxrwxrwt 3 root mail 512 Jul 9 13:48 /var/mail/ | |
714 | ||
715 | The \"w"\ allows any user to create new files in the directory, but | |
716 | the \"t"\ bit means that only the creator of a file is able to remove | |
717 | it. This is the same setting as is normally used with the \(/tmp)\ | |
718 | directory. | |
719 | ||
720 | (2) Arrange to run the local_delivery transport under a specific group | |
721 | by changing the configuration to read | |
722 | ||
723 | ==> local_delivery: | |
724 | driver = appendfile | |
725 | file = /var/mail/${local_part} | |
726 | group = mail | |
727 | ||
728 | The delivery process still runs under the user's uid, but with the | |
729 | group set to \"mail"\. The group permission on the directory allows | |
730 | the process to create and remove the lock file. | |
731 | ||
732 | The choice between (1) and (2) is up to the administrator. If the | |
733 | second solution is used, users can empty their mailboxes by updating | |
734 | them, but cannot delete them. | |
735 | ||
736 | If your problem involves mail to \/root/\, see also Q0507. | |
737 | ||
738 | ||
739 | Q0037: I am experiencing mailbox locking problems with Sun's \"mailtool"\ used | |
740 | over a network. | |
741 | ||
742 | A0037: See Q9705 in the Sun-specific section below. | |
743 | ||
744 | ||
745 | Q0038: What does the error message \*error in forward file (filtering not | |
746 | enabled): missing or malformed local part*\ mean? | |
747 | ||
748 | A0038: If you are trying to use an Exim filter, you have forgotten to enable | |
749 | the facility, which is disabled by default. In the \%redirect%\ router | |
750 | (in the Exim run time configuration file) you need to set | |
751 | ||
752 | ==> allow_filter = true | |
753 | ||
754 | to allow a \(.forward)\ file to be used as an Exim filter. If you are not | |
755 | trying to use an Exim filter, then you have put a malformed address in | |
756 | the \(.forward)\ file. | |
757 | ||
758 | ||
759 | Q0039: I have installed Exim, but now I can't mail to \/root/\ any more. Why is | |
760 | this? | |
761 | ||
762 | A0039: Most people set up \/root/\ as an alias for the manager of the host. If | |
763 | you haven't done this, Exim will attempt to deliver to \/root/\ as if it | |
764 | were a normal user. This isn't really a good idea because the delivery | |
765 | process would run as \/root/\. Exim has a trigger guard in the option | |
766 | ||
767 | ==> never_users = root | |
768 | ||
769 | in the default configuration file. This prevents it from running as \/root/\ | |
770 | when doing any deliveries. If you really want to run local deliveries as | |
771 | \/root/\, remove this line, but it would be better to create an alias for | |
772 | \/root/\ instead. | |
773 | ||
774 | ||
775 | Q0040: How can I stop undeliverable bounce messages (e.g. to routeable, but | |
776 | undeliverable, spammer senders) from clogging up the queue for days? | |
777 | ||
778 | A0040: If at all possible, you should try to avoid getting into this situation | |
779 | in the first place, for example, by verifying recipients so that you | |
780 | do not accept undeliverable messages that lead to these bounces. | |
781 | You can, however, configure Exim to discard failing bounce messages | |
782 | early. Just set \ignore_bounce_errors_after\ to specify a (short) time | |
783 | to keep them for. | |
784 | ||
785 | ||
786 | Q0041: What does the message \*unable to set gid=ddd or uid=ddd (euid=ddd): | |
787 | local delivery to ... transport=ttt*\ mean? | |
788 | ||
789 | A0041: Have you remembered to make Exim setuid \/root/\? It needs root privilege if | |
790 | it is to do any local deliveries, because it does them ``as the user''. | |
791 | Note also that the partition from which Exim is running (where the | |
792 | binary is installed) must not have the \nosuid\ mount option set. You | |
793 | can check this by looking at its \(/etc/fstab)\ entry (or \(/etc/vfstab)\, | |
794 | depending on your OS). | |
795 | ||
796 | ||
797 | Q0042: My ISP's mail server is rejecting bounce messages from Exim, complaining | |
798 | that they have no sender. The SMTP trace does indeed show that the | |
799 | sender address is \"<>"\. Why is the Sender on the bounce message empty? | |
800 | ||
801 | A0042: Because the RFCs say it must be. Your ISP is at fault. Send them this | |
802 | extract from RFC 2821 section 6.1 (\*Reliable Delivery and Replies by | |
803 | Email*\): | |
804 | ||
805 | If there is a delivery failure after acceptance of a message, the | |
806 | receiver-SMTP MUST formulate and mail a notification message. This | |
807 | notification MUST be sent using a null (\"<>"\) reverse path in the | |
808 | envelope. The recipient of this notification MUST be the address | |
809 | from the envelope return path (or the ::Return-Path:: header line). | |
810 | However, if this address is null (\"<>"\), the receiver-SMTP MUST NOT | |
811 | send a notification. | |
812 | ||
813 | The reason that bounce messages have no sender is so that they | |
814 | themselves cannot provoke further bounces, as this could lead to a | |
815 | unending exchange of undeliverable messages. | |
816 | ||
817 | ||
818 | Q0043: What does the error \*Unable to get interface configuration: 22 Invalid | |
819 | argument*\ mean? | |
820 | ||
821 | A0043: This is an error that occurs when Exim is trying to find out the all the | |
822 | IP addresses on all of the local host's interfaces. If you have lots of | |
823 | virtual interfaces, this can occur if there are more than around 250 of | |
824 | them. The solution is to set the option \local_interfaces\ to list just | |
825 | those IP addresses that you want to use for making and receiving SMTP | |
826 | connections. | |
827 | ||
828 | ||
829 | Q0044: What does the error \*Failed to create spool file*\ mean? | |
830 | ||
831 | A0044: Exim has been unable to create a file in its spool area in which to | |
832 | store an incoming message. This is most likely to be either a | |
833 | permissions problem in the file hierarchy, or a problem with the uid | |
834 | under which Exim is running, though it could be something more drastic | |
835 | such as your disk being full. | |
836 | ||
837 | If you are running Exim with an alternate configuration file using a | |
838 | command such as \"exim -C altconfig..."\, remember that the use of -C | |
839 | takes away Exim's root privilege. | |
840 | ||
841 | Check that you have defined the spool directory correctly by running | |
842 | ||
843 | ==> exim -bP spool_directory | |
844 | ||
845 | and examining the output. Check the mode of this directory. It should | |
846 | look like this, assuming you are running Exim as user \/exim/\: | |
847 | ||
848 | ==> drwxr-x--- 6 exim exim 512 Jul 16 12:29 /var/spool/exim | |
849 | ||
850 | If there are any subdirectories already in existence, they should have | |
851 | the same permissions, owner, and group. Check also that you haven't got | |
852 | incorrect permissions on superior directories (for example, \(/var/spool)\). | |
853 | Check that you have set up the Exim binary to be setuid \/root/\. It should | |
854 | look like this: | |
855 | ||
856 | ==> -rwsr-xr-x 1 root xxx 502780 Jul 16 14:16 exim | |
857 | ||
858 | Note that it is not just the owner that must be \/root/\, but also the third | |
859 | permission must be \"s"\ rather than \"x"\. | |
860 | ||
861 | ||
862 | Q0045: I see entries in the log that mention two different IP addresses for the | |
863 | same connection. Why is this? For example: | |
864 | ||
865 | ==> H=tip-mp8-ncs-13.stanford.edu ([36.173.0.189]) [36.173.0.156] | |
866 | ||
867 | A0045: The actual IP address from which the call came is the final one. | |
868 | Whenever there's something in parentheses in a host name, it is what the | |
869 | host quoted as the domain part of an SMTP HELO or EHLO command. So in | |
870 | this case, the client, despite being 36.173.0.156, issued the command | |
871 | ||
872 | ==> EHLO [36.173.0.189] | |
873 | ||
874 | when it sent your server the message. This is, of course, very | |
875 | misleading. | |
876 | ||
877 | ||
878 | Q0046: A short time after I start Exim I see a defunct zombie process. What | |
879 | is causing this? | |
880 | ||
881 | A0046: Your system must be lightly loaded as far as mail is concerned. The | |
882 | daemon sets off a queue runner process when it is started, but it only | |
883 | tidies up completed child processes when it wakes up for some other | |
884 | reason. When there's nothing much going on, you occasionally see | |
885 | defunct processes like this waiting to be dealt with. This is | |
886 | perfectly normal. | |
887 | ||
888 | ||
889 | Q0047: On a reboot, or a restart of the mail system, I see the message \*Mailer | |
890 | daemons: exim abandoned: unknown, malformed, or incomplete option | |
891 | -bz sendmail*\. What does this mean? | |
892 | ||
893 | A0047: \-bz-\ is a Sendmail option requesting it to create a `configuration freeze | |
894 | file'. Exim has no such concept and so does not support the option. You | |
895 | probably have a line like | |
896 | ||
897 | ==> /usr/lib/sendmail -bz | |
898 | ||
899 | in some start-up script (e.g. \(/etc/init.d/mail)\) immedately before | |
900 | ||
901 | ==> /usr/lib/sendmail -bd -q15m | |
902 | ||
903 | The first of these lines should be commented out. | |
904 | ||
905 | ||
906 | Q0048: Whenever exim restarts it takes up to 3-5 minutes to start responding on | |
907 | the SMTP port. Why is this? | |
908 | ||
909 | A0048: Something else is hanging onto port 25 and not releasing it. One place | |
910 | to look is \(/etc/inetd.conf)\ in case for any reason an SMTP stream is | |
911 | configured there. | |
912 | ||
913 | ||
914 | Q0049: What does the log message \*no immediate delivery: more than 10 messages | |
915 | received in one connection*\ mean? | |
916 | ||
917 | A0049: A remote MTA sent a number of messages in a single SMTP session. Exim | |
918 | limits the number of immediate delivery processes it creates as a | |
919 | result of a single SMTP connection, in order to avoid creating a zillion | |
920 | processes on systems that can have many incoming connections. If you are | |
921 | dialing in to collect mail from your ISP, you should probably set | |
922 | \smtp_accept_queue_per_connection\ to some number larger than 10, or | |
923 | arrange to start a queue runner for local delivery (using \-ql-\) | |
924 | immediately after collecting the mail. | |
925 | ||
926 | ||
927 | Q0050: I am getting complaints from a customer who uses my Exim server for | |
928 | relaying that they are being blocked with a \*Too many connections*\ | |
929 | error. | |
930 | ||
931 | A0050: See \smtp_accept_max\, \smep_accept_max_per_host\ and \smtp_accept_reserve\. | |
932 | ||
933 | ||
934 | Q0051: When I try \"exim -bf"\ to test a system filter, I received the following | |
935 | error message: \*Filter error: unavailable filtering command "fail" near | |
936 | line 8 of filter file*\. | |
937 | ||
938 | A0051: Use the \-bF-\ option to test system filters. This gives you access to the | |
939 | freeze and fail actions. | |
940 | ||
941 | ||
942 | Q0052: What does \*ridiculously long message header*\ in an error report mean? | |
943 | ||
944 | A0052: There has to be some limit to the length of a message's header lines, | |
945 | because otherwise a malefactor could open an SMTP channel to your host, | |
946 | start a message, and then just send characters continuously until your | |
947 | host ran out of memory. (Exim stores all the header lines in main | |
948 | memory while processing a message). For this reason a limit is imposed | |
949 | on the total amount of memory that can be used for header lines. The | |
950 | default is 1MB, but this can be changed by setting \\HEADER_MAXSIZE\\ in | |
951 | \(Local/Makefile)\ before building Exim. Exceeding the limit provokes | |
952 | the ``ridiculous'' error message. | |
953 | ||
954 | ||
955 | Q0053: Exim on my host responds to a connection with \"220 *****..."\ and | |
956 | won't understand \\EHLO\\ commands. | |
957 | ||
958 | A0053: This is the sign of a Cisco Pix ``Mailguard'' sitting in front of your | |
959 | MTA. Pix breaks ESMTP and only does SMTP. It is a nuisance when you have | |
960 | a secure MTA running on your box. Something like ``no fixup protocol | |
961 | smtp 25'' in the Pix configuration is needed. It may be possible to do | |
962 | this by logging into the Pix (using \^telnet^\ or \^ssh^\) and typing | |
963 | \"no fixup smtp"\ to its console. (You may need to use other commands | |
964 | before or after to set up configuration mode and to activate a changed | |
965 | configuration. Consult your Pix documentation or expert.) See also | |
966 | Q0078. | |
967 | ||
968 | ||
969 | Q0054: I'm getting an Exim configuration error \*unknown rewrite flag | |
970 | character (m) in line 386*\ but I haven't used any flags on my rewriting | |
971 | rules. | |
972 | ||
973 | A0054: You have probably forgotten to quote a replacement string that contains | |
974 | white space. | |
975 | ||
976 | ||
977 | Q0055: What does the error \*Failed to open wait-remote_smtp database: Invalid | |
978 | argument*\ mean? | |
979 | ||
980 | A0055: This is something that happens if you have existing DBM hints files when | |
981 | you install a new version of Exim that is compiled to use a different or | |
982 | upgraded DBM library. The simplest thing to try is | |
983 | ||
984 | ==> rm /var/spool/exim/db/* | |
985 | ||
986 | This removes all the hints files. Exim will start afresh and build new | |
987 | ones. If the symptom recurs, it suggests there is some problem with your | |
988 | DBM library. | |
989 | ||
990 | ||
991 | Q0056: We are using Exim to send mail from our web server. However, whenever a | |
992 | user sends an email it gets sent with the return path (envelope sender) | |
993 | //apache@server_name.com// because the PHP script is running as | |
994 | \/apache/\. | |
995 | ||
996 | A0056: You need to include \/apache/\ in the \trusted_users\ configuration option. | |
997 | Only trusted users are permitted to specify senders when mail is passed | |
998 | to Exim via the command line. | |
999 | ||
1000 | ||
1001 | Q0057: We've got people complaining about attachments that don't show up | |
1002 | as attachments, but are included in the body of the message. | |
1003 | ||
1004 | A0057: These symptoms can be seen when some software passes a CRLF line | |
1005 | terminated message via the command line to an MTA that expects lines to | |
1006 | be terminated by LF only, and so preserves the CRs as data. If you can | |
1007 | identify the software that is doing this, try setting the \-dropcr-\ | |
1008 | option on the command it uses to call Exim. Alternatively, you can set | |
1009 | \drop_cr\ in the configuration file, but then that will apply to all | |
1010 | input. | |
1011 | ||
1012 | ||
1013 | Q0058: What does the error \*failed to open DB file \(/var/spool/exim/db/retry)\: | |
1014 | File exists*\ mean? | |
1015 | ||
1016 | A0058: This error is most often caused when a hints file that was written with | |
1017 | one version of the Berkeley DB library is read by another version. | |
1018 | Sometimes this can happen if you change from a binary version of Exim to | |
1019 | a locally compiled version. Or it can happen if you compile and install | |
1020 | a new version of Exim after changing Berkeley DB versions. You can find | |
1021 | out which version your Exim is using by running: | |
1022 | ||
1023 | ==> ldd /usr/sbin/exim | |
1024 | ||
1025 | The solution to the problem is to delete all the files in the | |
1026 | \(/var/spool/exim/db)\ directory, and let Exim recreate them. | |
1027 | ||
1028 | ||
1029 | Q0059: When my Outlook Express 6.0 client sends a STARTTLS command to begin a | |
1030 | TLS session, Exim doesn't seem to receive it. The Outlook log shows | |
1031 | this: | |
1032 | ||
1033 | ==> SMTP: 14:19:27 [tx] STARTTLS | |
1034 | SMTP: 14:19:27 [rx] 500 Unsupported command. | |
1035 | ||
1036 | but the Exim debugging output shows this: | |
1037 | ||
1038 | ==> SMTP<< EHLO xxxx | |
1039 | SMTP>> 250-yyyy Hello xxxx [nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn] | |
1040 | 250-SIZE 52428800 | |
1041 | 250-PIPELINING | |
1042 | 250-AUTH CRAM-MD5 PLAIN LOGIN | |
1043 | 250-STARTTLS | |
1044 | 250 HELP | |
1045 | SMTP<< QUIT | |
1046 | ||
1047 | A0059: Turn off scanning of outgoing email in Norton Antivirus. If you aren't | |
1048 | running Norton Antivirus, see if you are running some other kind of SMTP | |
1049 | proxying, either on the client or on a firewall between the client and | |
1050 | server. ``Unsupported command'' is not an Exim message. | |
1051 | ||
1052 | ||
1053 | Q0060: Why am I getting the error \*failed to expand \"/data/lists/lists/${lc"\ | |
1054 | for require_files: \"${lc"\ is not a known operator*\ for this setting: | |
1055 | ||
1056 | ==> require_files = MAILMAN_HOME/lists/${lc:$local_part}/config.db | |
1057 | ||
1058 | A0060: The value of \"require_files"\ is a \*list*\ in which each item is | |
1059 | separately expanded. You need either to double the colon, or switch to | |
1060 | a different list separator. | |
1061 | ||
1062 | ||
1063 | Q0061: What does the error \*Too many ``Received'' headers - suspected mail | |
1064 | loop*\ mean? | |
1065 | ||
1066 | A0061: Whenever a message passes through an MTA, a ::Received:: header gets | |
1067 | added. Exim counts the number of these headers in incoming messages. If | |
1068 | there are more than the value of \received_headers_max\ (default 30), | |
1069 | Exim assumes there is some kind of mail routing loop occurring. For | |
1070 | example, host A passes the message to host B, which immediately passes | |
1071 | it back to host A. Check the ::Received:: headers and the mail logs to | |
1072 | determine exactly what is going on. | |
1073 | ||
1074 | One common cause of this problem is users with accounts on both systems | |
1075 | who set up each one to forward to the other, thinking that will cause | |
1076 | copies of all messages to be delivered on both of them. | |
1077 | ||
1078 | ||
1079 | Q0062: When I try to start an Exim daemon it crashes. I ran a debugger and | |
1080 | discovered that the crash is happening in the function \^^getservbyname()^^\. | |
1081 | What's going on? | |
1082 | ||
1083 | A0062: What have you got in the file \(/etc/nsswitch.conf)\? If it contains this | |
1084 | line: | |
1085 | ||
1086 | ==> services: db files | |
1087 | ||
1088 | try removing the \"db"\. (Your system is trying to look in some kind of | |
1089 | database before searching the file \(/etc/services)\.) | |
1090 | ||
1091 | ||
1092 | Q0063: When I try to start an Exim daemon, nothing happens. There is no | |
1093 | process, and nothing is written to the Exim log. | |
1094 | ||
1095 | A0063: Check to see if anything is written to \(syslog)\. This problem can be | |
1096 | caused by a permission problem that stops Exim from writing to its log | |
1097 | files, especially if you've specified that they should be written | |
1098 | somewhere other than under Exim's spool directory. You could also try | |
1099 | running the daemon with debugging turned on. | |
1100 | ||
1101 | ||
1102 | Q0064: When I run \"exim -d test@domain"\ it delivers fine, but when I send a | |
1103 | message from the \^mail^\ command, I get \*User unknown*\ and the mail | |
1104 | is saved in \(dead.letter)\. | |
1105 | ||
1106 | A0064: It looks as if Exim isn't being called by \^mail^\; instead it is | |
1107 | calling some other program (probably Sendmail). Try running the command | |
1108 | ||
1109 | ==> /usr/sbin/sendmail -bV | |
1110 | ||
1111 | (If you get \*No such file or directory*\ or \*Command not found*\ you | |
1112 | are running Solaris or IRIX. Try again with \(/usr/lib/sendmail)\.) The | |
1113 | output should be something like this: | |
1114 | ||
1115 | ==> Exim version 4.05 #1 built 13-Jun-2002 10:27:15 | |
1116 | Copyright (c) University of Cambridge 2002 | |
1117 | ||
1118 | If you don't see this, your Exim installation isn't fully operational. | |
1119 | If you are running FreeBSD, see Q9201. For other systems, see Q0114. | |
1120 | ||
1121 | ||
1122 | Q0065: When (as \/root/\) I use -C to run Exim with an alternate configuration | |
1123 | file, it gives an error about being unable to create a spool file when | |
1124 | trying to run an \%autoreply%\ transport. Why is this? | |
1125 | ||
1126 | A0065: When Exim is called with -C, it passes on -C to any instances of itself | |
1127 | that it calls (so that the whole sequence uses the same config file). If | |
1128 | it's running as \/exim/\ when it does this, all is well. However, if it | |
1129 | happens as a consequence of a non-privileged user running \%autoreply%\, | |
1130 | the called Exim gives up its root privilege. Then it can't write to the | |
1131 | spool. | |
1132 | ||
1133 | This means that you can't use -C (even as \/root/\) to run an instance of | |
1134 | Exim that is going to try to run \%autoreply%\ from a process that is | |
1135 | neither \/root/\ nor \/exim/\. Because of the architecture of Exim (using | |
1136 | re-execs to regain privilege), there isn't any way round this | |
1137 | restriction. Therefore, the only way you can make this scenario work is | |
1138 | to run the \%autoreply%\ transport as \/exim/\ (that is, the user that | |
1139 | owns the Exim spool files). This may be satisfactory for autoreplies | |
1140 | that are essentially system-generated, but of course is no good for | |
1141 | autoreplies from unprivileged users, where you want the \%autoreply%\ | |
1142 | transport to be run as the user. To get that to work with an alternate | |
1143 | configuration, you'll have to use two Exim binaries, with different | |
1144 | configuration file names in each. See S001 for a script that patches | |
1145 | the configuration name in an Exim binary. | |
1146 | ||
1147 | ||
1148 | Q0066: What does the message \*unable to set gid=xxx or uid=xxx*\ mean? | |
1149 | ||
1150 | A0066: This message is given when an Exim process is unable to change uid or | |
1151 | gid when it needs to, because it does not have root privilege. This is a | |
1152 | serious problem that prevents Exim from carrying on with what it is | |
1153 | doing. The two most common situations where Exim needs to change uid/gid | |
1154 | are doing local deliveries and processing users' filter files. There are | |
1155 | two common causes of this error: | |
1156 | ||
1157 | (1) You have forgotten to make the exim binary setuid to \/root/\. This | |
1158 | means that it can never change uid/gid in any situation. Also, the | |
1159 | setuid binary must reside on a disk partition that does not have the | |
1160 | \"nosuid"\ mount option set. | |
1161 | ||
1162 | (2) The exim binary is setuid, but you have configured Exim so that, | |
1163 | while trying to verify an address at SMTP time, it runs a router | |
1164 | that needs to change uid/gid. Because Exim runs as \/exim/\ and not | |
1165 | \/root/\ while receiving messages, the router is unable to change | |
1166 | uid and therefore it cannot operate. The usual example of this is a | |
1167 | \%redirect%\ router for users' filter files. | |
1168 | ||
1169 | Setting the \user\ or \check_local_user\ options on a \redirect\ | |
1170 | router causes this to happen (except in the special case when the | |
1171 | redirection list is provided by the \data\ option and does not | |
1172 | contain \":include:"\). | |
1173 | ||
1174 | The solution is to set \no_verify\ on the router that is causing the | |
1175 | problem. This means that it is skipped when an address is being | |
1176 | verified. In ``normal'' configurations where the router is indeed | |
1177 | handling users' filter files, this is quite acceptable, because you | |
1178 | do not usually need to process a filter file in order to verify that | |
1179 | the local part is valid. See, for example, the \%userforward%\ | |
1180 | router in the default configuration. | |
1181 | ||
1182 | ||
1183 | Q0067: What does the error \*too many unrecognized commands*\ mean? | |
1184 | ||
1185 | A0067: There have been instances of network abuse involving mail sent out by | |
1186 | web servers. In most cases, unrecognizable commands are sent as part of | |
1187 | the SMTP session. A real MTA never sends out such invalid commands. Exim | |
1188 | allows a few unrecognized commands in a session to permit humans who are | |
1189 | testing to make a few typos (it responds with a 5xx error). However, if | |
1190 | Exim receives too many such commands, it assumes that it is dealing with | |
1191 | an abuse of some kind, and so it drops the connection. | |
1192 | ||
1193 | ||
1194 | Q0068: Exim times out when trying to connect to some hosts, though those hosts | |
1195 | are known to be up and running. What's the problem? | |
1196 | ||
1197 | A0068: There could be a number of reasons for this (see also Q0017). The | |
1198 | obvious one is that there is a networking problem between the hosts. | |
1199 | If you can ping between the hosts or connect in other ways, the problem | |
1200 | might be caused by ECN (Explicit Congestion Notification) being enabled | |
1201 | in your kernel. ECN uses TCP flags originally assigned to TOS - it's a | |
1202 | "new" invention, and some hosts and routers are known to be confused if | |
1203 | a client uses it. If you are running Linux, you can turn ECN off by | |
1204 | running this command: | |
1205 | ||
1206 | ==> /bin/echo "0" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn | |
1207 | ||
1208 | This has also been reported to cure web connection problems from Mozilla | |
1209 | and Netscape browsers in Linux when there were no problems with Windows | |
1210 | Netscape browsers. | |
1211 | ||
1212 | ||
1213 | Q0069: What does the error \*SMTP data timeout (message abandoned) on connection | |
1214 | from...*\ mean? | |
1215 | ||
1216 | A0069: It means that there was a timeout while Exim was reading the contents of | |
1217 | a message on an incoming SMTP connection. That is, it had successfully | |
1218 | accepted a MAIL command, one or more RCPT commands, and a DATA command, | |
1219 | and was in the process of reading the data itself. The length of timeout | |
1220 | is controlled by the \smtp_receive_timeout\ option. | |
1221 | ||
1222 | If you get this error regularly, the cause may be incorrect handling of | |
1223 | large packets by a router or firewall. The maximum size of a packet is | |
1224 | restricted on some links; routers should split packets that are larger. | |
1225 | There is a feature called ``path MTU discovery'' that enables a sender | |
1226 | to discover the maximum packet size over an entire path (multiple | |
1227 | Internet links). This can be broken by misconfigured firewalls and | |
1228 | routers. There is a good explanation at \?http://www.netheaven.com/pmtu.html?\. | |
1229 | Reducing the MTU on your local network can sometimes work round this | |
1230 | problem. See Q0017 (3) for further discussion. | |
1231 | ||
1232 | ||
1233 | Q0070: What does the error \*SMTP command timeout on connection from...*\ mean? | |
1234 | ||
1235 | A0070: Exim was expecting to read an SMTP command from the client, but no | |
1236 | command was read within the \smtp_receive_timeout\ time limit. | |
1237 | ||
1238 | ||
1239 | Q0071: What does the error \*failed to open DB file \(/var/spool/exim//db/retry)\: | |
1240 | Illegal argument*\ mean? | |
1241 | ||
1242 | A0071: See Q0058. The cause of this error is usually the same. | |
1243 | ||
1244 | ||
1245 | Q0072: Exim will deliver to normal aliases, and aliases that are pipes or | |
1246 | files, but it objects to aliases that involve \":include:"\ items, | |
1247 | complaining that it can't change gid or uid. Why is this? | |
1248 | ||
1249 | A0072: See Q0066 for a general answer. The problem happens during verification | |
1250 | of an incoming SMTP message, not during delivery itself. In this | |
1251 | particular case, you must have set up your aliasing router with a \user\ | |
1252 | setting. This causes Exim to change uid/gid when reading \":include:"\ | |
1253 | files. If you do not need the detailed verification provided by the | |
1254 | router, the easy solution is to set \no_verify\ so that the router isn't | |
1255 | used during verification. | |
1256 | ||
1257 | Otherwise, if you set \user\ on the router in order to provide a user | |
1258 | for delivery to pipes or files, one solution is to put the \user\ | |
1259 | setting on the transports instead of on the router. You may need to | |
1260 | create some special transports just for this router. The alternative is | |
1261 | to supply two different routers, one with \user\ and \no_verify\, and | |
1262 | the with \verify_only\ but no \user\ setting. | |
1263 | ||
1264 | ||
1265 | Q0073: I'm seeing log file corruption, with parts of log lines getting mangled | |
1266 | by other log entries. | |
1267 | ||
1268 | A0073: The only time this has been seen is when several servers were writing to | |
1269 | the same log files over NFS. Exim assumes that its log file is on local | |
1270 | disk, and using NFS, especially for more than one server, will not work. | |
1271 | ||
1272 | ||
1273 | Q0074: What does the error message \*remote delivery process count got out of | |
1274 | step*\ mean? | |
1275 | ||
1276 | A0074: Exim uses subprocesses for remote deliveries; this error means that the | |
1277 | master process expected to have a child process running, but found there | |
1278 | were none. Prior to release 4.11, this error could be caused by running | |
1279 | Exim under \^strace^\ on a Linux system, because stracing causes | |
1280 | children to be ``stolen'' such that a parent that tries to wait for | |
1281 | ``any of my children'' is told that it has none. Current releases of | |
1282 | Exim have code to get round this problem. | |
1283 | ||
1284 | ||
1285 | Q0075: I'm using LDAP, and some email addresses that contain special characters | |
1286 | are causing parsing errors in my LDAP lookups. | |
1287 | ||
1288 | A0075: You should be using \"${quote_ldap:$local_part}"\ instead of just | |
1289 | \"$local_part"\ in your lookups. | |
1290 | ||
1291 | ||
1292 | Q0076: I've configured Exim to use \^syslog^\ for its logs, with the main and | |
1293 | reject logs sent to different files, but whenever a message is rejected, | |
1294 | I get one message on the reject log and two messages on the main log. | |
1295 | ||
1296 | A0076: You are probably putting your reject items into the main log as well; | |
1297 | remember \^syslog^\ levels are inclusive (for example, \"mail.info"\ | |
1298 | includes all higher levels, so a \"mail.notice"\ message will be caught | |
1299 | by a \"mail.info"\ descriptor). | |
1300 | Test this by running the command: | |
1301 | ||
1302 | ==> logger -p mail.notice test | |
1303 | ||
1304 | and seeing which logs it goes into. | |
1305 | ||
1306 | ||
1307 | Q0077: I've installed Exim and it is delivering mail just fine. However, when I | |
1308 | try to read mail from my PC I get \*connection rejected*\ or \*unable to | |
1309 | connect*\. | |
1310 | ||
1311 | A0077: See Q5021. | |
1312 | ||
1313 | ||
1314 | Q0078: Exim is logging the unknown SMTP command \"XXXX"\ from my client hosts, | |
1315 | and they are unable to authenticate. | |
1316 | ||
1317 | A0078: This is a sign of a Cisco PIX firewall getting in the way. It does not | |
1318 | support ESMTP, and turns EHLO commands into XXXX. You should configure | |
1319 | the Pix to leave SMTP alone; see Q0053 for how to do this. | |
1320 | ||
1321 | ||
1322 | Q0079: Our new PIX firewall is causing problems with incoming mail. How can | |
1323 | this be fixed? | |
1324 | ||
1325 | A0079: See Q0053 and Q0078. If some messages get through and others do not, | |
1326 | see also Q0017. | |
1327 | ||
1328 | ||
1329 | Q0080: Am I to understand that the database lookups must only return one value? | |
1330 | They can not return a list of values? The documentation seems to | |
1331 | indicate that it's possible to return a list. | |
1332 | ||
1333 | A0080: Lookups can be used in two different situations, and what they return is | |
1334 | different in the two cases. (Be thankful Exim 3 is gone; there was yet | |
1335 | another case!) | |
1336 | ||
1337 | (1) You can use a lookup in any expanded string. The syntax is | |
1338 | ||
1339 | ==> ${lookup ..... } | |
1340 | ||
1341 | In this case, whatever is looked up replaces the expansion item. It | |
1342 | may be one value or a list of values. Whether a single value or a | |
1343 | list is acceptable or not depends on where you are using the string | |
1344 | expansion. If it is for an option that expects just one value, then | |
1345 | only one value is allowed (for example). | |
1346 | ||
1347 | (2) You can make use of the lookup mechanism to test whether something | |
1348 | (typically a host name or IP address) is in a list. For example, | |
1349 | ||
1350 | ==> hosts = a : b : c | |
1351 | ||
1352 | in an ACL tests whether the calling host's name matches ``a'', or | |
1353 | ``b'', or ``c''. Now, suppose you want to keep the list of names in | |
1354 | a database, or cdb file, or NIS map, or... By writing | |
1355 | ||
1356 | ==> hosts = pgsql;select .... | |
1357 | ||
1358 | you are saying to Exim: ``Run this lookup; if it succeeds, behave as | |
1359 | if the host is in the list; if it fails, the host is not in the | |
1360 | list.'' You are using the indexing mechanism of the database as a | |
1361 | fast way of checking a list. A simpler example is | |
1362 | ||
1363 | ==> hosts = lsearch;/some/file | |
1364 | ||
1365 | where the file contains the list of hosts to be searched. | |
1366 | ||
1367 | The complication happens when a list is first expanded before being | |
1368 | interpreted as a list. This happens in a lot of cases. You can therefore | |
1369 | write either of these: | |
1370 | ||
1371 | ==> hosts = cdb;/some/file | |
1372 | hosts = ${lookup{something}cdb{/some/file}} | |
1373 | ||
1374 | but they have different meanings. The first means ``see if the host name | |
1375 | is in the list in this file''. The second means ``run this lookup and | |
1376 | use the result of the lookup as a list of host items to check''. In the | |
1377 | second case, the list could contain multiple values (colon separated), | |
1378 | and one of those values could even be ``cdb;/some/file''. | |
1379 | ||
1380 | Flexibility does lead to complexity, I'm afraid. | |
1381 | ||
1382 | ||
1383 | Q0081: What does \*error in redirect data: included file xxxx is too big*\ | |
1384 | mean? | |
1385 | ||
1386 | A0081: You are trying to include a very large file in a redirection list, using | |
1387 | the \":include:"\ feature. Exim has a built-in limit on the size, as a | |
1388 | safety precaution. The default is 1 megabyte. If you want to increase | |
1389 | this, you have to rebuild Exim. In your \(Local/Makefile)\, put | |
1390 | ||
1391 | ==> MAX_INCLUDE_SIZE = whatever | |
1392 | ||
1393 | and then rebuild Exim. The value is a number of bytes, but you can give | |
1394 | it as a parenthesized arithmetic expression such as \"(3*1024*1024)"\. | |
1395 | However, an included file of more than a megabyte is likely to be quite | |
1396 | inefficient. How many addresses does yours contain? You get the best | |
1397 | performance out of Exim if you arrange to send mailing list messages | |
1398 | with no more than about 100 recipients (in order to get parallelism in | |
1399 | the routing). | |
1400 | ||
1401 | ||
1402 | Q0082: What does \*relocation error: /lib/libnss_dns.so.2: symbol | |
1403 | __libc_res_nquery, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file | |
1404 | libresolv.so.2 with link time reference*\ mean? | |
1405 | ||
1406 | A0082: You have updated \^glibc^\ while an Exim daemon is running. Stop and | |
1407 | restart the daemon. | |
1408 | ||
1409 | ||
1410 | Q0083: Netscape on Unix is sending messages containing an unqualified user name | |
1411 | in the ::Sender:: header line, which Exim is rejecting because I have | |
1412 | set \"verify = header_syntax"\. How can I fix this? | |
1413 | ||
1414 | A0083: The only thing you can do in Exim is to set the | |
1415 | \sender_unqualified_hosts\ option to allow unqualified sender addresses | |
1416 | form the relevant hosts; of course, this applies to all sender | |
1417 | addresses, not just the ::Sender:: header line. | |
1418 | ||
1419 | Alternatively, you can configure Netscape not to include the header line | |
1420 | in the first place. Add the following line to the | |
1421 | \($HOME/.netscape/preferences.js)\ and \($HOME/.netscape/liprefs.js)\ | |
1422 | files: | |
1423 | ||
1424 | ==> user_pref("mail.suppress_sender_header", true); | |
1425 | ||
1426 | Netscape \*must*\ be shutdown while doing this. | |
1427 | ||
1428 | ||
1429 | Q0084: I want to set up an alias that pipes a message to \^gpg^\ and then pipes | |
1430 | the result to \^mailx^\ to resubmit the message, but when I use my | |
1431 | tested command in an alias file, I get an error from \^gpg^\. | |
1432 | ||
1433 | A0084: Probably you are using a shell command with two pipe symbols in it. An | |
1434 | alias like this: | |
1435 | ||
1436 | ==> gpg-xxx: "|gpg <options> | mailx <options" | |
1437 | ||
1438 | does not work, because Exim does not run pipes under a shell by default. | |
1439 | You must call a shell explicitly if you want to make use of the shell's | |
1440 | features for double-piping, either by piping to \"/bin/sh"\ with a | |
1441 | suitable \"-c"\ option, or by piping to a shell script. | |
1442 | ||
1443 | ||
1444 | Q0085: I see a lot of \*rejected EHLO ... syntactically invalid argument(s)*\. | |
1445 | I know it's because of the underscore in the host name, but is there a | |
1446 | switch to allow Exim to accept mail from such hosts? | |
1447 | ||
1448 | A0085: Yes. Add this to your configuration: | |
1449 | ||
1450 | ==> helo_allow_chars = _ | |
1451 | ||
1452 | For more seriously malformed host names, see \helo_accept_junk_hosts\. | |
1453 | See also Q0732. | |
1454 | ||
1455 | ||
1456 | Q0086: What does \*SMTP protocol violation: synchronization error (next input | |
1457 | sent too soon)*\ mean? | |
1458 | ||
1459 | A0086: SMTP is a ``lock-step'' protocol, which means that, at certain points in | |
1460 | the protocol, the client must wait for the server to respond before | |
1461 | sending more data. Exim checks for correct behaviour, and issues this | |
1462 | error if the client sends data too soon. This protects against | |
1463 | malefactious clients who send a bunch of SMTP commands (usually to | |
1464 | transmit spam) without waiting for any replies. | |
1465 | ||
1466 | This error is also provoked if the client is trying to start up a TLS | |
1467 | session immediately on connection, without using the STARTTLS command. | |
1468 | See Q1707 for a discussion of this case. | |
1469 | ||
1470 | ||
1471 | Q0087: What does \*rejected after DATA: malformed address: xx@yy may not follow | |
1472 | <xx@yy> : failing address in "from" header*\ mean? (I've obscured the | |
1473 | real email addresses.) | |
1474 | ||
1475 | A0087: Your DATA ACL contains | |
1476 | ||
1477 | ==> verify = header_syntax | |
1478 | ||
1479 | and an incoming message contained the line | |
1480 | ||
1481 | ==> From: xx@yy <xx@yy> | |
1482 | ||
1483 | This is syntactically invalid. The contents of an address in a header | |
1484 | line are either just the address, or a ``phrase'' followed by an address | |
1485 | in angle brackets. In the latter case, the ``phrase'' must be quoted if | |
1486 | it contains special characters such as @. The following are valid | |
1487 | versions of the bad header: | |
1488 | ||
1489 | ==> From: xx@yy | |
1490 | From: "xx@yy" <xx@yy> | |
1491 | ||
1492 | though why on earth anything generates this kind of redundant nonsense I | |
1493 | can't think. | |
1494 | ||
1495 | ||
1496 | Q0088: The Windows mailer SENDFILE.EXE sometimes hangs while trying to send a | |
1497 | message to Exim 4, and eventually times out. It worked flawlessly with | |
1498 | Exim 3. What has changed? | |
1499 | ||
1500 | A0088: Exim 4 sets an obscure TCP/IP parameter called TCP_NODELAY. This | |
1501 | disables the "Nagle algorithm" for the TCP/IP transmission. The Nagle | |
1502 | algorithm can improve network performance in interactive situations such | |
1503 | as a human typing at a keyboard, by buffering up outgoing data until the | |
1504 | previous packet has been acknowledged, and thereby reducing the number | |
1505 | of packets used. This is not relevant for mail transmission, which | |
1506 | mostly consists of quite large blocks of data; setting TCP_NODELAY | |
1507 | should improve performance. However, it seems that some Windows clients | |
1508 | do not function correctly if the server turns off the Nagle algorithm. | |
1509 | If you are using Exim 4.23 or later, you can set | |
1510 | ||
1511 | ==> tcp_nodelay = false | |
1512 | ||
1513 | This stops Exim setting TCP_NODELAY on the sockets created by the | |
1514 | listening daemon. | |
1515 | ||
1516 | ||
1517 | Q0089: What does the error \*kernel: application bug: exim(12099) has SIGCHLD | |
1518 | set to SIG_IGN but calls wait()*\ mean? | |
1519 | ||
1520 | A0089: This was a bad interaction between a relatively recent change to the | |
1521 | Linux kernel and some ``belt and braces'' programming in Exim. The | |
1522 | following explanation is taken from Exim's change log: | |
1523 | ||
1524 | When Exim is receiving multiple messages on a single connection, and | |
1525 | spinning off delivery processess, it sets the SIGCHLD signal handling to | |
1526 | SIG_IGN, because it doesn't want to wait for these processes. However, | |
1527 | because on some OS this didn't work, it also has a paranoid call to | |
1528 | \^waitpid()^\ in the loop to reap any children that have finished. Some | |
1529 | versions of Linux now complain (to the system log) about this | |
1530 | ``illogical'' call to \^waitpid()^\. I have therefore put it inside a | |
1531 | conditional compilation, and arranged for it to be omitted for Linux. | |
1532 | ||
1533 | I am pretty sure I caught all the places in Exim where this happened. | |
1534 | However, there are still occasional reports of this error. I have not | |
1535 | heard of any resolutions, but my current belief is that they are caused | |
1536 | by something that Exim calls falling foul of the same check. There was | |
1537 | at one time a suspicion that the IPv6 stack was involved. | |
1538 | ||
1539 | ||
1540 | Q0090: I can't seem to get a pipe command to run when I include a \"${lookup"\ | |
1541 | expansion in it. | |
1542 | ||
1543 | A0090: See Q0025. | |
1544 | ||
1545 | ||
1546 | Q0091: Why is Exim giving the error \*Failed to send message from address_reply | |
1547 | transport*\ when I run it using -C to specify an alternate | |
1548 | configuration? | |
1549 | ||
1550 | A0091: See Q0065. | |
1551 | ||
1552 | ||
1553 | ||
1554 | 1. BUILDING AND INSTALLING | |
1555 | ||
1556 | Q0101: I'm having a problem with an Exim RPM. | |
1557 | ||
1558 | A0101: Normally the thing to do if you have a problem with an RPM package is | |
1559 | to contact the person who built the package first, not the person who | |
1560 | made the software that's in the package. You can usually find out who | |
1561 | made a package using the following command: | |
1562 | ||
1563 | ==> rpm --query --package --queryformat '%{PACKAGER}\n' <rpm-package-file> | |
1564 | ||
1565 | where \[rpm-package-file]\ is the actual file, e.g. \(exim-3.03-2.i386.rpm)\. | |
1566 | Or, if the package is installed on your system: | |
1567 | ||
1568 | ==> rpm --query --queryformat '%{PACKAGER}\n' <package-name> | |
1569 | ||
1570 | where \[package-name]\ is the name component of the package, e.g. \"exim"\. | |
1571 | If the packager is unable or unwilling to help, only then should you | |
1572 | contact the actual author or associated mailing list of the software. | |
1573 | ||
1574 | If you discover through the querying process that you can't tell who | |
1575 | the person (or company or group) is who built the package, or that they | |
1576 | no longer exist at the given address, then you should reconsider | |
1577 | whether you want a package from an unknown source on your system. | |
1578 | ||
1579 | If you discover through the querying process that you yourself are the | |
1580 | person who built the package, then you should either (a) contact the | |
1581 | author or associated mailing list, or (b) reconsider whether you ought | |
1582 | to be building and distributing RPM packages of software you don't | |
1583 | understand. | |
1584 | ||
1585 | Similar rules of thumb govern other binary package formats, including | |
1586 | debs, tarballs, and POSIX packages. | |
1587 | ||
1588 | ||
1589 | Q0102: I can't get Exim to compile with Berkeley DB version 2.x or 3.x. | |
1590 | ||
1591 | A0102: Have you set \"USE_DB=yes\" in \(Local/Makefile)\? This causes Exim to use the | |
1592 | native interface to the DBM library instead of the compatibility | |
1593 | interface, which needs a header called \(ndbm.h)\ that may not exist on your | |
1594 | system. | |
1595 | ||
1596 | ||
1597 | Q0103: I'm getting an \*undefined symbol*\ error for \"hosts_ctl"\ when I try to | |
1598 | build Exim. (On some systems this error is \*undefined reference to | |
1599 | 'hosts_ctl'*\.) | |
1600 | ||
1601 | A0103: You should either remove the definition of \\USE_TCP_WRAPPERS\\ or add | |
1602 | \"-lwrap"\ to your \\EXTRALIBS\\ setting in Local/Makefile. | |
1603 | ||
1604 | ||
1605 | Q0104: I'm about to upgrade to a new Exim release. Do I need to ensure the | |
1606 | spool is empty, or take any other special action? | |
1607 | ||
1608 | A0104: It depends on where you are coming from. | |
1609 | ||
1610 | (1) If you are changing to release 4.00 or later from a release prior to | |
1611 | 4.00, you will need to make changes to the run time configuration file. | |
1612 | See the file \(doc/Exim4.upgrade)\ for details. If you are coming from | |
1613 | before release 3.00, you should also see \(doc/Exim3.upgrade)\. | |
1614 | ||
1615 | (2) If you are upgrading from an Exim 4 release to a later release, you | |
1616 | do not need to take special action. New releases are made backwards | |
1617 | compatible with old spool files and hints databases, so that upgrading | |
1618 | can be done on a running system. All that should be necessary is to | |
1619 | install a new binary and then HUP the daemon. | |
1620 | ||
1621 | ||
1622 | Q0105: What does the error \*install-info: command not found*\ mean? | |
1623 | ||
1624 | A0105: You have set \\INFO_DIRECTORY\\ in your \(Local/Makefile)\, and Exim is trying | |
1625 | to install the Texinfo documentation, but cannot find the command called | |
1626 | \(install-info)\. If you have a version of Texinfo prior to 3.9, you | |
1627 | should upgrade. Otherwise, check your installation of Texinfo to see why | |
1628 | the \(install-info)\ command is not available. | |
1629 | ||
1630 | ||
1631 | Q0106: Exim doesn't seem to be recognizing my operating system type correctly, | |
1632 | and so is failing to build. | |
1633 | ||
1634 | A0106: Run the command \"scripts/os-type -generic"\. The output should be one of | |
1635 | the known OS types, and should correspond to your operating system. You | |
1636 | can see which OS are supported by obeying \"ls OS/Makefile-*"\ and looking | |
1637 | at the file name suffixes. | |
1638 | ||
1639 | If there is a discrepancy, it means that the script is failing to | |
1640 | interpret the output from the \"uname"\ command correctly, or that the | |
1641 | output is wrong. Meanwhile, you can build Exim by obeying | |
1642 | ||
1643 | ==> EXIM_OSTYPE=xxxx make | |
1644 | ||
1645 | instead of just \"make"\, provided you are running a Bourne-compatible | |
1646 | shell, or otherwise by setting \\EXIM_OSTYPE\\ correctly in your | |
1647 | environment. It is probably best to start again from a clean | |
1648 | distribution, to avoid any wreckage left over from the failed attempt. | |
1649 | ||
1650 | ||
1651 | Q0107: Exim fails to build, complaining about the absence of the \"killpg"\ | |
1652 | function. | |
1653 | ||
1654 | A0107: This function should be present in all modern flavours of Unix. If you | |
1655 | are using an older version, you should be able to get round the problem | |
1656 | by inserting | |
1657 | ||
1658 | ==> #define killpg(pgid,sig) kill(-(pgid),sig) | |
1659 | ||
1660 | into the file called \(OS/os.h-xxx)\, where xxx identifies your operating | |
1661 | system, and is the output of the command \"scripts/os-type -generic"\. | |
1662 | ||
1663 | ||
1664 | Q0108: I'm getting an unresolved symbol \"ldap_is_ldap_url"\ when trying to build | |
1665 | Exim. | |
1666 | ||
1667 | A0108: You must have specified \"LOOKUP_LDAP=yes"\ in the configuration. Have you | |
1668 | remembered to set \"-lldap"\ somewhere (e.g. in \\LOOKUP_LIBS\\)? You need that | |
1669 | in order to get the LDAP library scanned when linking. | |
1670 | ||
1671 | ||
1672 | Q0109: I'm getting an unresolved symbol \"mysql_close"\ when trying to build Exim. | |
1673 | ||
1674 | A0109: You must have specified \"LOOKUP_MYSQL=yes"\ in the configuration. Have you | |
1675 | remembered to set \"-lmysqlclient"\ somewhere (e.g. in \\LOOKUP_LIBS\\)? You | |
1676 | need that in order to get the MySQL library scanned when linking. | |
1677 | ||
1678 | ||
1679 | Q0110: I'm trying to build Exim with PAM support. I have included \"-lpam"\ in | |
1680 | \\EXTRALIBS\\, but I'm still getting a linking error: | |
1681 | ||
1682 | ==> /lib/libpam.so: undefined reference to `dlerror' | |
1683 | /lib/libpam.so: undefined reference to `dlclose' | |
1684 | /lib/libpam.so: undefined reference to `dlopen' | |
1685 | /lib/libpam.so: undefined reference to `dlsym' | |
1686 | ||
1687 | A0110: Add \"-ldl"\ to \\EXTRALIBS\\. In some systems these dynamic loading functions | |
1688 | are in their own library. | |
1689 | ||
1690 | ||
1691 | Q0111: I'm getting the error \*db.h: No such file or directory*\ when I try to | |
1692 | build Exim. | |
1693 | ||
1694 | A0111: This problem has been seen with RedHat 7.0, but could also happen in | |
1695 | other environments. If your system is using the DB library, you | |
1696 | need to install the DB development package in order to build Exim. | |
1697 | The package is called something like \"db3-devel-3.1.14-16.i386.rpm"\ for | |
1698 | Linux systems, but you should check which version of DB you have | |
1699 | installed (current releases are DB 4). | |
1700 | ||
1701 | ||
1702 | Q0112: I'm getting the error \*/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldb*\ when I try to | |
1703 | build Exim. | |
1704 | ||
1705 | A0112: This is probably the same problem as Q0111. | |
1706 | ||
1707 | ||
1708 | Q0113: I've compiled Exim and I've managed to start it but there was one | |
1709 | problem - it always complained that \(libmsqlclient.so.10)\ was not found, | |
1710 | even though this file is in \(/usr/local/lib/mysql/)\. | |
1711 | ||
1712 | A0113: Solaris: ensure you have this in your \(Local/Makefile)\: | |
1713 | ||
1714 | ==> LOOKUP_LIBS=-L/usr/local/lib/mysql -R/usr/local/lib/mysql | |
1715 | ||
1716 | Net/Open/FreeBSD: Run this command (or ensure it gets run automatically | |
1717 | at boot time): | |
1718 | ||
1719 | ==> ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib/mysql | |
1720 | ||
1721 | Linux: add \(/usr/local/lib/mysql)\ to \(/etc/ld.so.conf)\ and re-run \(ldconfig)\. | |
1722 | Alternatively, add | |
1723 | ||
1724 | ==> -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib/mysql | |
1725 | ||
1726 | to EXTRA_LIBS and then re-link (this is similar to the Solaris solution | |
1727 | above). This will probably also work on other systems that use GNU | |
1728 | Binutils. | |
1729 | ||
1730 | ||
1731 | Q0114: How can I remove Sendmail from my system? I've built Exim and run \"make | |
1732 | install"\, but it still doesn't seem to be fully operational. | |
1733 | ||
1734 | A0114: If you are running FreeBSD, see Q9201. Otherwise, you need to arrange | |
1735 | that whichever of the paths \(/usr/sbin/sendmail)\ or \(/usr/lib/sendmail)\ | |
1736 | exists on your system is changed to refer to Exim. For example, you | |
1737 | could use these commands (as \/root/\): | |
1738 | ||
1739 | ==> mv /usr/sbin/sendmail /usr/sbin/sendmail.original | |
1740 | chmod u-s /usr/sbin/sendmail.original | |
1741 | ln -s /path/to/exim /usr/sbin/sendmail | |
1742 | ||
1743 | The second command removes the setuid privilege from the old MTA, as a | |
1744 | general safety precaution. In the third command, substitute the actual | |
1745 | path to the Exim binary for \(/path/to/exim)\. | |
1746 | ||
1747 | ||
1748 | Q0115: What does \*Can't open \(../scripts/newer)\: No such file or directory*\ | |
1749 | mean? I got it while trying to build Exim. | |
1750 | ||
1751 | A0115: You are using FreeBSD, or another OS that has a \^make^\ command which | |
1752 | tries to optimize the running of commands. Exim's \(Makefile)\ contains | |
1753 | targets with sequential commands like this: | |
1754 | ||
1755 | ==> buildpcre: | |
1756 | @cd pcre; $(MAKE) SHELL=$(SHELL) AR="$(AR)" $(MFLAGS) CC="$(CC)" \ | |
1757 | CFLAGS="$(CFLAGS) $(PCRE_CFLAGS)" \ | |
1758 | RANLIB="$(RANLIB)" HDRS="$(PHDRS)" \ | |
1759 | INCLUDE="$(INCLUDE) $(IPV6_INCLUDE) $(TLS_INCLUDE)" | |
1760 | @if $(SHELL) $(SCRIPTS)/newer pcre/libpcre.a exim; then \ | |
1761 | /bin/rm -f exim eximon.bin; fi | |
1762 | ||
1763 | The second command assumes that the \"cd pcre"\ in the first command is | |
1764 | no longer in effect. If you have \"-j3"\ in your default set of | |
1765 | \"MAKEFLAGS"\, FreeBSD \^make^\ tries to optimize, and ends up up with both | |
1766 | commands in the same shell process. The result is that \"$(SCRIPTS)"\ | |
1767 | (which has a value of \"../scripts"\) is not found. | |
1768 | ||
1769 | The simplest solution is to force \^make^\ to use backwards compatibility | |
1770 | mode with each command in its own shell, by using the \-B\ flag. To | |
1771 | ensure that this happens throughout the build, it's best to export it in | |
1772 | your environment: | |
1773 | ||
1774 | ==> MAKEFLAGS='-B' | |
1775 | export MAKEFLAGS | |
1776 | make | |
1777 | ||
1778 | ||
1779 | Q0116: I have tried to build Exim with Berkeley DB 3 and 4, but I always get | |
1780 | errors. | |
1781 | ||
1782 | A0116: One common problem, especially when you have several different versions | |
1783 | of BDB installed on the same host, is that the header files and library | |
1784 | files for BDB are not in a standard place. You therefore need to tell | |
1785 | Exim where they are, by setting INCLUDE and DBMLIB in your | |
1786 | \(Local/Makefile)\. For example, I use this on my workstation when | |
1787 | I want to build with DB 4.1: | |
1788 | ||
1789 | ==> INCLUDE=-I/opt/local/include/db-4.1 | |
1790 | DBMLIB=/opt/local/lib/db-4.1/libdb.a | |
1791 | ||
1792 | Specifying the complete library file like this will cause it to be | |
1793 | statically linked with Exim. You'll have to check to see where these | |
1794 | files are on your system. For example, on FreeBSD 5, the header is in | |
1795 | \(/usr/local/include/db4)\ and the library is in \(/usr/local/lib)\ and | |
1796 | called \(libdb4)\. In that environment, you could use: | |
1797 | ||
1798 | ==> INCLUDE=-I/usr/local/include/db4 | |
1799 | DBMLIB=-L/usr/local/lib -ldb4 | |
1800 | ||
1801 | This time, DBMLIB is specifying the library directory (\(/usr/local/lib)\) | |
1802 | and the name of the library (\(db4)\) separately. The name of the actual | |
1803 | library file is \(/usr/local/lib/libdb4.something)\. If the library was | |
1804 | compiled for dynamic linking, that will be used. | |
1805 | ||
1806 | ||
1807 | Q0117: Is there a quick walk-through of an Exim install from source anywhere? | |
1808 | ||
1809 | A0117: Here! This is a contribution from a RedHat user, somewhat edited. On | |
1810 | other operating systems things may be slightly different, but the | |
1811 | general approach is the same. | |
1812 | ||
1813 | (1) Install the db needed for Exim. This needs to be done first if you | |
1814 | don't have a DBM library installed. Go to \?http://www.sleepycat.com?\ | |
1815 | and download \(db-4.1.25.tar.gz)\, or whatever the current release is. | |
1816 | Then: | |
1817 | ||
1818 | ==> gunzip db-4.1.25.tar.gz | |
1819 | tar -xvf db-4.1.25.tar | |
1820 | cd db-4.1.25 | |
1821 | cd build_unix | |
1822 | ../dist/configure | |
1823 | make | |
1824 | make install | |
1825 | ||
1826 | (2) Add a user for use by Exim, unless you want to use an existing user | |
1827 | such as \/mail/\: | |
1828 | ||
1829 | ==> adduser exim | |
1830 | ||
1831 | (3) Now you can prepare to build Exim. Go to \?http://www.exim.org?\ or | |
1832 | one of its mirrors, or the master ftp site | |
1833 | \?ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/email/exim/exim4?\, and download | |
1834 | \(exim-4.20.tar.gz)\ or whatever the current release is. Then: | |
1835 | ||
1836 | ==> gunzip exim-4.20.tar.gz | |
1837 | tar -xvf exim-4.20.tar | |
1838 | cd exim-4.20 | |
1839 | cp src/EDITME Local/Makefile | |
1840 | cp exim_monitor/EDITME Local/eximon.conf | |
1841 | ||
1842 | (4) Edit \(Local/Makefile)\: | |
1843 | ||
1844 | Comment out EXIM_MONITOR= unless you want to install the Exim | |
1845 | monitor (it requires X-windows). | |
1846 | ||
1847 | Set the user you want Exim to use for itself: | |
1848 | ||
1849 | ==> EXIM_USER=exim | |
1850 | ||
1851 | If your DBM library is Berkeley DB, set up to use its native interface: | |
1852 | ||
1853 | ==> USE_DB=yes | |
1854 | ||
1855 | Make sure Exim's build can find the DBM library and its headers. If | |
1856 | you've installed Berkeley DB 4 you'll need to have settings like this | |
1857 | in \(Local/Makefile)\: | |
1858 | ||
1859 | ==> INCLUDE=-I/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.1/include | |
1860 | DBMLIB=/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.1/lib/libdb.a | |
1861 | ||
1862 | (Check that the first directory contains the db.h file and that the | |
1863 | second library exists.) | |
1864 | ||
1865 | You don't need to change anything else, but you might want to review | |
1866 | the default settings in the ``must specify'' section. | |
1867 | ||
1868 | (4) Build Exim by running the \/make/\ command. | |
1869 | ||
1870 | (5) Install Exim by running, as \/root/\: | |
1871 | ||
1872 | ==> make install | |
1873 | ||
1874 | You \*must*\ be \/root/\ to do this. You do not have to be root for any of | |
1875 | the previous building activity. | |
1876 | ||
1877 | (6) Run some tests on Exim; see if it will do local and remote | |
1878 | deliveries. Change the configuration if necessary (for example, | |
1879 | uncommenting \group\ on the \%local_delivery%\ transport if you don't | |
1880 | use a ``sticky bit'' directory). | |
1881 | ||
1882 | (7) Change Sendmail to Exim (of course you need to have had Sendmail | |
1883 | installed to do this). | |
1884 | ||
1885 | ==> /etc/init.d/sendmail stop | |
1886 | mv /usr/sbin/sendmail /usr/sbin/sendmail.org | |
1887 | ln -s /usr/exim/bin/exim /usr/sbin/sendmail | |
1888 | /etc/init.d/sendmail start | |
1889 | ||
1890 | (8) Check the Exim log. Either use the Exim monitor, or: | |
1891 | ||
1892 | ==> tail -f /var/spool/exim/log/mainlog | |
1893 | ||
1894 | ||
1895 | Q0118: I've set \"LOOKUP_INCLUDE=-I/client/include"\ in Local/Makefile, but the | |
1896 | compilation of \^exim_dumpdb^\ is ignoring this option and failing. Why? | |
1897 | ||
1898 | A0118: LOOKUP_INCLUDE is the special include file for lookup modules in Exim | |
1899 | (e.g. mysql, LDAP). Confusingly, it doesn't apply to basic DBM code | |
1900 | which is used also for other things. Try setting INCLUDE and DBMLIB | |
1901 | instead. For example: | |
1902 | ||
1903 | ==> USE_DB=yes | |
1904 | INCLUDE=-I/client/include | |
1905 | DBMLIB=/client/lib/libdb.a | |
1906 | ||
1907 | ||
1908 | Q0119: I know there are some 3rd-party patches for Exim, for exiscan and | |
1909 | other things. Where are they? | |
1910 | ||
1911 | A0119: Exiscan is at \?http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan-acl/?\. | |
1912 | [[br]] | |
1913 | Scanexi is at \?http://w1.231.telia.com/~u23107873/scanexi.html?\ | |
1914 | [[br]] | |
1915 | A sample \^^local_scan()^^\ function for interfacing to \^uvscan^\ is | |
1916 | at \?http://www.dcs.qmul.ac.uk/~mb/local_scan/?\. | |
1917 | [[br]] | |
1918 | An interface to SpamAssassin at SMTP time is at | |
1919 | \?http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/sa.html?\. | |
1920 | [[br]] | |
1921 | A mini-HOWTO (PDF file) about scanning and virus scanning, and some RPMs | |
1922 | can be found at \?http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/exim.php?\. | |
1923 | ||
1924 | ||
1925 | ||
1926 | 2. ROUTING IN GENERAL | |
1927 | ||
1928 | Q0201: How can I arrange that messages larger than some limit are handled by | |
1929 | a special router? | |
1930 | ||
1931 | A0201: You can use a \condition\ option on the router line this: | |
1932 | ||
1933 | ==> condition = ${if >{$message_size}{100K}{yes}{no}} | |
1934 | ||
1935 | ||
1936 | Q0202: Can I specify a list of domains to explicitly reject? | |
1937 | ||
1938 | A0202: Set up a named domain list containing the domains in the first section | |
1939 | of the configuration, for example: | |
1940 | ||
1941 | ==> domainlist reject_domains = list:of:domains:to:reject | |
1942 | ||
1943 | You can use this list in an ACL to reject any SMTP recipients in those | |
1944 | domains. You can also give a customized error message, like this: | |
1945 | ||
1946 | ==> deny message = The domain $domain is no longer supported | |
1947 | domains = +reject_domains | |
1948 | ||
1949 | If you also want to reject these domains in messages that are submitted | |
1950 | from the command line (not using SMTP), you need to set up a router to | |
1951 | do it, like this: | |
1952 | ||
1953 | ==> reject_domains: | |
1954 | driver = redirect | |
1955 | domains = +reject_domains | |
1956 | allow_fail | |
1957 | data = :fail: The domain $domain is no longer supported | |
1958 | ||
1959 | ||
1960 | Q0203: How can I arrange to do my own qualification of non-fully-qualified | |
1961 | domains, and then pass them on to the next router? | |
1962 | ||
1963 | A0203: If you have some list of domains that you want to qualify, you can do | |
1964 | this using a redirect router. For example, | |
1965 | ||
1966 | ==> qualify: | |
1967 | driver = redirect | |
1968 | domains = *.a.b | |
1969 | data = ${quote:$local_part}@$domain.c.com | |
1970 | ||
1971 | This adds \".c.com"\ to any domain that matches \"*.a.b"\. | |
1972 | If you want to do this in conjunction with a \%dnslookup%\ router, the | |
1973 | \widen_domains\ option of that router may be another way of achieving | |
1974 | what you want. | |
1975 | ||
1976 | ||
1977 | Q0204: Every system has a \"nobody"\ account under which httpd etc run. I would | |
1978 | like to know how to restrict mail which comes from that account to users | |
1979 | on that host only. | |
1980 | ||
1981 | A0204: Set up a first router like this: | |
1982 | ||
1983 | ==> fail_nobody: | |
1984 | driver = redirect | |
1985 | senders = nobody@your.domain | |
1986 | domains = ! +local_domains | |
1987 | allow_fail | |
1988 | data = :fail: Nobody may not mail off-site | |
1989 | ||
1990 | This assumes you have defined \+local_domains\ as in the default | |
1991 | configuration. | |
1992 | ||
1993 | ||
1994 | Q0205: How can I get Exim to deliver to me locally and everyone else at the same | |
1995 | domain via SMTP to the MX record specified host? | |
1996 | ||
1997 | A0205: Create an \%accept%\ router to pick off the one address and pass it to | |
1998 | an appropriate transport. Put this router before the one that does MX | |
1999 | routing: | |
2000 | ||
2001 | ==> me: | |
2002 | driver = accept | |
2003 | domains = dom.com | |
2004 | local_parts = me | |
2005 | transport = local_delivery | |
2006 | ||
2007 | In the transport you will have to specify the \user\ option. An | |
2008 | alternative way of doing this is to add a condition to the router that | |
2009 | does MX lookups to make it skip your address. Subsequent routers can then | |
2010 | deliver your address locally. You'll need a condition like this: | |
2011 | ||
2012 | ==> condition = \ | |
2013 | ${if and {{eq{$domain}{dom.com}}{eq{$local_part}{me}}}{no}{yes}} | |
2014 | ||
2015 | ||
2016 | Q0206: How can I get Exim to deliver certain domains to a different SMTP port | |
2017 | on my local host? | |
2018 | ||
2019 | A0206: You must set up a special \%smtp%\ transport, where you can specify the | |
2020 | \port\ option, and then set up a router to route the domains to that | |
2021 | transport. There are two possibilities for specifying the host: | |
2022 | ||
2023 | (1) If you use a \%manualroute%\ router, you can specify the local host | |
2024 | in the router options. You must also set | |
2025 | ||
2026 | ==> self = send | |
2027 | ||
2028 | so that it does not object to sending to the local host. | |
2029 | ||
2030 | (2) If you use a router that cannot specify hosts (for example, an | |
2031 | \%accept%\ router with appropriate conditions), you have to specify | |
2032 | the host using the \hosts\ option of the transport. In this case, | |
2033 | you must also set \allow_localhost\ on the transport. | |
2034 | ||
2035 | ||
2036 | Q0207: Why does Exim lower-case the local-part of a non-local domain when | |
2037 | routing? | |
2038 | ||
2039 | A0207: Because \caseful_local_part\ is not set (in the default configuration) | |
2040 | for the \%dnslookup%\ router. This does not matter because the local | |
2041 | part takes no part in the routing, and the actual local part that is | |
2042 | sent out in the RCPT command is always the original local part. | |
2043 | ||
2044 | ||
2045 | ||
2046 | 3. ROUTING TO REMOTE HOSTS | |
2047 | ||
2048 | Q0301: What do \*lowest numbered MX record points to local host*\ and \*remote | |
2049 | host address is the local host*\ mean? | |
2050 | ||
2051 | A0301: They mean exactly what they say. Exim expected to route an address to a | |
2052 | remote host, but the IP address it obtained from a router was for the | |
2053 | local host. If you really do want to send over TCP/IP to the local host | |
2054 | (to a different version of Exim or another MTA, for example), see Q0206. | |
2055 | ||
2056 | More commonly, these errors arise when Exim thinks it is routing some | |
2057 | foreign domain. For example, the router configuration causes Exim to | |
2058 | look up the domain in the DNS, but when Exim examines the DNS output, | |
2059 | either the lowest numbered MX record points at the local host, or there | |
2060 | are no MX records, and the address record for the domain contains an | |
2061 | IP address that belongs to the local host. | |
2062 | ||
2063 | There has been a rash of instances of domains being deliberately set up | |
2064 | with MX records pointing to \"localhost"\ (or other names with A records | |
2065 | that specify 127.0.0.1), which causes this behaviour. You can use the | |
2066 | \ignore_target_hosts\ option to get Exim to ignore these records. The | |
2067 | default contiguration does this. For more discussion, see Q0319. For | |
2068 | other cases: | |
2069 | ||
2070 | (1) If the domain is meant to be handled as a local domain, there | |
2071 | is a problem with the configuration, because it should not then have | |
2072 | been looked up in the DNS. Check the \domains\ settings on your | |
2073 | routers. | |
2074 | ||
2075 | (2) If the domain is one for which the local host is providing a | |
2076 | relaying service (called ``mail hubbing''), possibly as part of a | |
2077 | firewall, you need to set up a router to tell Exim where to send | |
2078 | messages addressed to this domain, because the DNS directs them to | |
2079 | the local host. You should put a router like this one before the one | |
2080 | that does DNS lookups: | |
2081 | ||
2082 | ==> hubbed_hosts: | |
2083 | driver = manualroute | |
2084 | transport = remote_smtp | |
2085 | route_list = see discussion below | |
2086 | ||
2087 | The contents of the \route_list\ option depend on how many hosts you | |
2088 | are hubbing for, and how their names are related to the domain name. | |
2089 | Suppose the local host is a firewall, and all the domains in | |
2090 | \(*.foo.bar)\ have MX records pointing to it, and each domain | |
2091 | corresponds to a host of the same name. Then the setting could be | |
2092 | ||
2093 | ==> route_list = *.foo.bar $domain | |
2094 | ||
2095 | If there isn't a convenient relationship between the domain names | |
2096 | and the host names, you either have to list each domain separately, | |
2097 | or use a lookup expansion to look up the host from the domain, or | |
2098 | put the routing information in a file and use the \route_data\ | |
2099 | option with a lookup expansion. | |
2100 | ||
2101 | (3) If neither (1) nor (2) is the case, the lowest numbered MX record or | |
2102 | the address record for the domain should not be pointing to your | |
2103 | host. You should arrange to get the DNS mended. | |
2104 | ||
2105 | ||
2106 | Q0302: Why does Exim say \*all relevant MX records point to non-existent hosts*\ | |
2107 | when MX records point to IP addresses? | |
2108 | ||
2109 | A0302: MX records cannot point to IP addresses. They are defined to point to | |
2110 | host names, so Exim always interprets them that way. (An IP address is a | |
2111 | syntactically valid host name.) The DNS for the domain you are having | |
2112 | problems with is misconfigured. | |
2113 | ||
2114 | However, it appears that more and more DNS zones are breaking the rules | |
2115 | and putting IP addresses on the RHS of MX records. Exim follows the | |
2116 | rules and rejects this, but other MTAs do support it, so the | |
2117 | \allow_mx_to_ip\ was regretfully added at release 3.14 to permit this | |
2118 | heinous activity. | |
2119 | ||
2120 | ||
2121 | Q0303: How do I configure Exim to send all messages to a central server? I | |
2122 | don't want to do any local deliveries at all on this host. | |
2123 | ||
2124 | A0303: Use this as your first and only router: | |
2125 | ||
2126 | ==> send_to_gateway: | |
2127 | driver = manualroute | |
2128 | transport = remote_smtp | |
2129 | route_list = * central.server.host | |
2130 | ||
2131 | ||
2132 | Q0304: How do I configure Exim to send all non-local mail to a gateway host? | |
2133 | ||
2134 | A0304: Replace the \%dnslookup%\ router in the default configuration with the | |
2135 | following: | |
2136 | ||
2137 | ==> send_to_gateway: | |
2138 | driver = manualroute | |
2139 | domains = !+local_domains | |
2140 | transport = remote_smtp | |
2141 | route_list = * gate.way.host | |
2142 | ||
2143 | If there are several hosts you can send to, you can specify them as a | |
2144 | colon-separated list. | |
2145 | ||
2146 | ||
2147 | Q0305: How can I arrange for mail on my local network to be delivered directly | |
2148 | to the relevant hosts, but all other mail to be sent to my ISP's mail | |
2149 | server? The local hosts are all DNS-registered and behave like normal | |
2150 | Internet hosts. | |
2151 | ||
2152 | A0305: Set up a first router to pick off all the domains for your local | |
2153 | network. There are several ways you might do this. For example | |
2154 | ||
2155 | ==> local_network: | |
2156 | driver = dnslookup | |
2157 | transport = remote_smtp | |
2158 | domains = *.mydomain.com | |
2159 | ||
2160 | This does a perfectly conventional DNS routing operation, but only for | |
2161 | the domains that match \(*.mydomain.com)\. Follow this with a `smart | |
2162 | host' router: | |
2163 | ||
2164 | ==> internet: | |
2165 | driver = manualroute | |
2166 | domains = !+local_domains | |
2167 | transport = remote_smtp | |
2168 | route_list = * mail.isp.net | |
2169 | ||
2170 | This routes any other non-local domains to the smart host. | |
2171 | ||
2172 | ||
2173 | Q0306: How do I configure Exim to send all non-local mail to a central server | |
2174 | if it cannot be immediately delivered by my host? I don't want to have | |
2175 | queued mail waiting on my host. | |
2176 | ||
2177 | A0306: Add to the \%remote_smtp%\ transport the following: | |
2178 | ||
2179 | ==> fallback_hosts = central.server.name(s) | |
2180 | ||
2181 | If there are several names, they must be separated by colons. | |
2182 | ||
2183 | ||
2184 | Q0307: The \route_list\ setting \"^foo$:^bar$ $domain"\ in a \%manualroute%\ | |
2185 | router does not work. | |
2186 | ||
2187 | A0307: The first thing in a \route_list\ item is a single pattern, not a list of | |
2188 | patterns. You need to write that as \"^(foo|bar)$ $domain"\. | |
2189 | Alternatively, you could use several items and write | |
2190 | ||
2191 | ==> route_list = foo $domain; bar $domain | |
2192 | ||
2193 | Note the semicolon separator. This is because the second thing in each | |
2194 | item can itself be a list - of hosts. | |
2195 | ||
2196 | ||
2197 | Q0308: I have a domain for which some local parts must be delivered locally, | |
2198 | but the remainder are to be treated like any other remote addresses. | |
2199 | ||
2200 | A0308: One possible way of doing this is as follows: Assuming you are using a | |
2201 | configuration that is similar to the default one, first exclude your | |
2202 | domain from the first router by changing it to look like this: | |
2203 | ||
2204 | ==> non_special_remote: | |
2205 | driver = dnslookup | |
2206 | domains = ! +local_domains : ! special.domain | |
2207 | transport = remote_smtp | |
2208 | ignore_target_hosts = 127.0.0.0/8 | |
2209 | no_more | |
2210 | ||
2211 | Then add a second router which handles the local parts that are not to | |
2212 | be delivered locally: | |
2213 | ||
2214 | ==> special_remote: | |
2215 | driver = dnslookup | |
2216 | domains = special.domain | |
2217 | local_parts = ! lsearch;/list/of/special/localparts | |
2218 | transport = remote_smtp | |
2219 | ignore_target_hosts = 127.0.0.0/8 | |
2220 | no_more | |
2221 | ||
2222 | The remaining local parts will fall through to the remaining routers, | |
2223 | which can delivery them locally. | |
2224 | ||
2225 | ||
2226 | Q0309: How can I configure Exim on a firewall machine so that if mail arrives | |
2227 | addressed to a domain whose MX points to the firewall, it is forwarded | |
2228 | to the internal mail server, without having to have a list of all the | |
2229 | domains involved? | |
2230 | ||
2231 | A0309: As your first router, have the standard \%dnslookup%\ router from the | |
2232 | default configuration, with the added option | |
2233 | ||
2234 | ==> self = pass | |
2235 | ||
2236 | This will handle all domains whose lowest numbered MX records do not | |
2237 | point to your host. Because of the \no_more\ setting, if it encounters | |
2238 | an unknown domain, routing will fail. However, if it hits a domain whose | |
2239 | lowest numbered MX points to your host, the \self\ option comes into | |
2240 | play, and overrides \no_more\. The \"pass"\ setting causes it to pass | |
2241 | the address on to the next router. (The default causes it to generate an | |
2242 | error.) | |
2243 | ||
2244 | The only non-local domains that reach the second router are those with | |
2245 | MX records pointing to the local host. Set it up to send them to the | |
2246 | internal mail server like this: | |
2247 | ||
2248 | ==> internal: | |
2249 | driver = manualroute | |
2250 | domains = ! +local_domains | |
2251 | transport = remote_smtp | |
2252 | route_list = * internal.server | |
2253 | ||
2254 | ||
2255 | Q0310: If a DNS lookup returns no MX records why doesn't Exim just bin the | |
2256 | message? | |
2257 | ||
2258 | A0310: If a DNS lookup returns no MXs, Exim looks for an address record, in | |
2259 | accordance with the rules that are defined in the RFCs. If you want to | |
2260 | break the rules, you can set \mx_domains\ in the \%dnslookup%\ router, but | |
2261 | you will cut yourself off from those sites (and there still seem to be | |
2262 | plenty) who do not set up MX records. | |
2263 | ||
2264 | ||
2265 | Q0311: When a DNS lookup for MX records fails to complete, why doesn't Exim | |
2266 | send the messsage to the host defined by the A record? | |
2267 | ||
2268 | A0311: The RFCs are quite clear on this. Only if it is known that there are no | |
2269 | MX records is an MTA allowed to make use of the A record. When an MX | |
2270 | lookup fails to complete, Exim does not know whether there are any MX | |
2271 | records or not. There seem to be some name servers (or some | |
2272 | configurations of some name servers) that give a ``server fail'' error when | |
2273 | asked for a non-existent MX record. Exim uses standard resolver calls, | |
2274 | which unfortunately do not distinguish between this case and a timeout, | |
2275 | so all Exim can do is try again later. | |
2276 | ||
2277 | ||
2278 | Q0312: Is it possible to use a conditional expression for the host item in a | |
2279 | \route_list\ for \%manualroute%\ router? I tried the following, but it | |
2280 | doesn't work: | |
2281 | ||
2282 | ==> route_list = * ${if match{$header_from:}{\N.*\.usa\.net$\N} \ | |
2283 | {<smarthost1>}{<smarthost2>} | |
2284 | ||
2285 | A0312: The problem is that the second item in \route_list\ contains white | |
2286 | space, which means that it gets terminated prematurely. To avoid this, | |
2287 | you must put the second item in quotes: | |
2288 | ||
2289 | ==> route_list = * "${if match{$header_from:}{\N.*\.usa\.net$\N} \ | |
2290 | {<smarthost1>}{<smarthost2>}}" | |
2291 | ||
2292 | ||
2293 | Q0313: I send all external mail to a smart host, but this means that bad | |
2294 | addresses also get passed to the smart host. Can I avoid this? | |
2295 | ||
2296 | A0313: Assuming you have DNS availability, set up a conventional \%dnslookup%\ | |
2297 | router to do the routing, but in the \%remote_smtp%\ transport set this: | |
2298 | ||
2299 | ==> hosts = your.smart.host | |
2300 | hosts_override | |
2301 | ||
2302 | This will override the hosts that the router finds so that everything | |
2303 | goes to the smart host, but any non-existent domains will be failed by | |
2304 | the router. | |
2305 | ||
2306 | ||
2307 | Q0314: I have a really annoying intermittent problem where attempts to mail to | |
2308 | valid sites are rejected with \*unknown mail domain*\. This only happens a | |
2309 | few times a day and there is no particular pattern to the sites it | |
2310 | rejects. If I try to lookup the same domain a few minutes later then it | |
2311 | is OK. | |
2312 | ||
2313 | A0314: This is almost certainly a problem with the DNS resolver or the the | |
2314 | domain's name servers. | |
2315 | ||
2316 | (1) Have you linked Exim against the newest DNS resolver library that | |
2317 | comes with Bind? If you are using SunOS4 that may be your problem, as | |
2318 | the resolver that comes with that OS is known to be buggy and to give | |
2319 | intermittent false negatives. | |
2320 | ||
2321 | (2) Effects like this are sometimes seen if a domain's name servers get | |
2322 | out of step with each other. | |
2323 | ||
2324 | ||
2325 | Q0315: I'd like route all mail with addresses that can't be resolved (the DNS | |
2326 | lookup times out) to a relay machine. | |
2327 | ||
2328 | A0315: Set \pass_on_timeout\ on your \%dnslookup%\ router, and add below it a | |
2329 | \%manualroute%\ router that routes all relevant domains to the relay. | |
2330 | ||
2331 | ||
2332 | Q0316: I would like to forward all incoming email for a particular domain to | |
2333 | another host via SMTP. Whereabouts would I configure that? | |
2334 | ||
2335 | A0316: Use this as your first router: | |
2336 | ||
2337 | ==> special: | |
2338 | driver = manualroute | |
2339 | transport = remote_smtp | |
2340 | route_list = the.particular.domain the.other.host | |
2341 | ||
2342 | You will also need to adjust the ACL for incoming SMTP so that this | |
2343 | domain is accepted for relaying. If you are using the default | |
2344 | configuration, there is a domain list called \relay_domains\ that is | |
2345 | set up for this. | |
2346 | ||
2347 | ||
2348 | Q0317: What I'd like to do is have alternative smart hosts, where the one to be | |
2349 | used is determined by which ISP I'm connected to. | |
2350 | ||
2351 | A0317: The simplest way to do this is to arrange for the name of the smart host | |
2352 | du jour to be placed in a file when you connect, say \(/etc/smarthost)\. | |
2353 | Then you can read this file from a \%manualroute%\ router like this: | |
2354 | ||
2355 | ==> smarthost: | |
2356 | driver = manualroute | |
2357 | transport = remote_smtp | |
2358 | route_list = * ${readfile{/etc/smarthost}{}} | |
2359 | ||
2360 | The second argument of the \"readfile"\ item is a string that replaces | |
2361 | any newline characters in the file (in this case, with nothing). | |
2362 | By keeping the data out of the main configuration file, you avoid having | |
2363 | to HUP the daemon when it changes. | |
2364 | ||
2365 | ||
2366 | Q0318: Exim won't route to a host with no MX record. | |
2367 | ||
2368 | A0318: More than one thing may cause this. | |
2369 | ||
2370 | (1) Are you sure there really is no MX record? Sometimes a typo results | |
2371 | in a malformed MX record in the zone file, in which case some name | |
2372 | servers give a SERVFAIL error rather than NXDOMAIN. Exim has to treat | |
2373 | this as a temporary error, so it can't go on to look for address records. | |
2374 | You can check for this state using one of the DNS interrogation commands, | |
2375 | such as \(nslookup)\, \(host)\, or \(dig)\. | |
2376 | ||
2377 | (2) Is there a wildcard MX record for \(your)\ domain? Is the | |
2378 | \search_parents\ option on in your \%dnslookup%\ router? If the answer to | |
2379 | both these questions is ``yes'', that is the cause of the problem. When | |
2380 | the DNS resolver fails to find the MX record, it tries adding on your | |
2381 | domain if \search_parents\ is true, and thereby finds your wildcard MX | |
2382 | record. For example: | |
2383 | ||
2384 | . There is a wildcard MX record for \(*.a.b.c)\. | |
2385 | ||
2386 | . There is a host called \(x.y.z)\ that has an A record and no MX record. | |
2387 | ||
2388 | . Somebody on the host \(m.a.b.c)\ domain tries to mail to \(user@x.y.z)\. | |
2389 | ||
2390 | . Exim calls the DNS to look for an MX record for \(x.y.z)\. | |
2391 | ||
2392 | . The DNS doesn't find any MX record. Because \search_parents\ is true, | |
2393 | it then tries searching the current host's parent domain, so it | |
2394 | looks for \(x.y.z.a.b.c)\ and picks up the wildcard MX record. | |
2395 | ||
2396 | Setting \search_parents\ false makes this case work while retaining the | |
2397 | wildcard MX record. However, anybody on the host \(m.a.b.c)\ who mails to | |
2398 | \(user@n.a)\ (expecting it to go to \(user@n.a.b.c)\) now has a problem. The | |
2399 | \widen_domains\ option of the \%dnslookup%\ router may be helpful in this | |
2400 | circumstance. | |
2401 | ||
2402 | ||
2403 | Q0319: I have some mails on my queues that are sticking around longer than | |
2404 | the retry time indicates they should. They are all getting frozen | |
2405 | because some remote admin has set their MX record to 127.0.0.1. | |
2406 | ||
2407 | A0319: The admin in question is an idiot. Exim will always freeze such messages | |
2408 | because they are apparently routed to the local host. To bounce these | |
2409 | messages immediately, set | |
2410 | ||
2411 | ==> ignore_target_hosts = 127.0.0.1 | |
2412 | ||
2413 | on the \%dnslookup%\ router. This causes Exim to completely ignore any hosts | |
2414 | with that IP address. In fact, there are quite a number of IP addresses | |
2415 | that should never be used. Here is a suggested configuration list for | |
2416 | the IPv4 ones: | |
2417 | ||
2418 | ==> # Don't allow domains whose single MX (or A) record is a | |
2419 | # "special-use IPv4 address", as listed in RFC 3330. | |
2420 | ignore_target_hosts = \ | |
2421 | # Hosts on "this network"; RFC 1700 (page 4) states that these | |
2422 | # are only allowed as source addresses | |
2423 | 0.0.0.0/8 : \ | |
2424 | # Private networks, RFC 1918 | |
2425 | 10.0.0.0/8 : 172.16.0.0/12 : 192.168.0.0/16 : \ | |
2426 | # Internet host loopback address, RFC 1700 (page 5) | |
2427 | 127.0.0.0/8 : \ | |
2428 | # "Link local" block | |
2429 | 169.254.0.0/16 : \ | |
2430 | # "TEST-NET" - should not appear on the public Internet | |
2431 | 192.0.2.0/24 : \ | |
2432 | # 6to4 relay anycast addresses, RFC 3068 | |
2433 | 192.88.99.0/24 : \ | |
2434 | # Network interconnect device benchmark testing, RFC 2544 | |
2435 | 198.18.0.0/15 : \ | |
2436 | # Multicast addresses, RFC 3171 | |
2437 | 224.0.0.0/4 : \ | |
2438 | # Reserved for future use, RFC 1700 (page 4) | |
2439 | 240.0.0.0/4 | |
2440 | ||
2441 | ||
2442 | Q0320: How can I arrange for all mail to \*user@some.domain*\ to be forwarded | |
2443 | to \*user@other.domain*\? | |
2444 | ||
2445 | A0320: Put this as your first router: | |
2446 | ||
2447 | ==> forward: | |
2448 | driver = redirect | |
2449 | domains = some.domain | |
2450 | data = ${quote:$local_part}@other.domain | |
2451 | ||
2452 | ||
2453 | Q0321: How can I tell an Exim router to use only IPv4 or only IPv6 addresses | |
2454 | when it finds both types in the DNS? | |
2455 | ||
2456 | A0321: You can do this by making it ignore the addresses you don't want. This | |
2457 | example ignores all IPv6 addresses and all IPv4 addresses in the 127 | |
2458 | network: | |
2459 | ||
2460 | ==> ignore_target_hosts = <; 0000::0000/0 ; 127.0.0.0/8 | |
2461 | ||
2462 | To ignore all IPv4 addresses, use | |
2463 | ||
2464 | ==> ignore_target_hosts = 0.0.0.0/0 | |
2465 | ||
2466 | See Q0319 for a general discussion of \ignore_target_hosts\. | |
2467 | ||
2468 | ||
2469 | Q0322: How can I reroute all messages bound for 192.168.10.0 and 10.0.0.0 to | |
2470 | a specific mail server? | |
2471 | ||
2472 | A0322: That is an odd requirement. However, there is an obscure feature in | |
2473 | Exim, originally implemented for packet radio people, that perhaps can | |
2474 | help. Check out the \translate_ip_address\ generic router option. | |
2475 | ||
2476 | ||
2477 | ||
2478 | 4. ROUTING FOR LOCAL DELIVERY | |
2479 | ||
2480 | Q0401: I need to have any mail for \(virt.dom.ain)\ that doesn't match one of the | |
2481 | aliases in \(/usr/lib/aliases.virt)\ delivered to a particular address, for | |
2482 | example, \(postmaster@virt.dom.ain)\. | |
2483 | ||
2484 | A0401: Adding an asterisk to a search type causes Exim to look up ``*'' when the | |
2485 | normal lookup fails. So if your aliasing router is something like this: | |
2486 | ||
2487 | ==> virtual: | |
2488 | driver = redirect | |
2489 | domains = virt.dom.ain | |
2490 | data = ${lookup{$local_part}lsearch{/usr/lib/aliases.virt}} | |
2491 | no_more | |
2492 | ||
2493 | you should change \"lsearch"\ to \"lsearch*"\, and put this in the alias | |
2494 | file: | |
2495 | ||
2496 | ==> *: postmaster@virt.dom.ain | |
2497 | ||
2498 | This solution has the feature that if there are several unknown | |
2499 | addresses in the same message, only one copy gets sent to the | |
2500 | postmaster, because of Exim's normal de-duplication rules. | |
2501 | ||
2502 | NOTE: This solution works only if there is also an entry for \(postmaster)\ | |
2503 | in the alias file, ultimately resolving to an address that is not in | |
2504 | \(virt.dom.ain)\. See also Q0434. | |
2505 | ||
2506 | ||
2507 | Q0402: How do I arrange for all incoming email for \(*@some.domain)\ to go into one | |
2508 | pop3 mail account? The customer doesn't want to add a list of specific | |
2509 | local parts to the system. | |
2510 | ||
2511 | A0402: Set up a special transport that writes to the mailbox like this: | |
2512 | ||
2513 | ==> special_transport: | |
2514 | driver = appendfile | |
2515 | file = /pop/mailbox | |
2516 | envelope_to_add | |
2517 | return_path_add | |
2518 | delivery_date_add | |
2519 | user = exim | |
2520 | ||
2521 | The file will be written as the user \"exim"\. Then arrange to route all | |
2522 | mail for that domain to that transport, with a router like this: | |
2523 | ||
2524 | ==> special_router: | |
2525 | driver = accept | |
2526 | domains = some.domain | |
2527 | transport = special_transport | |
2528 | ||
2529 | ||
2530 | Q0403: How do I configure Exim to send messages for unknown local users to a | |
2531 | central server? | |
2532 | ||
2533 | A0403: Assuming you are using something like the default configuration, where | |
2534 | local users are processed by the later routers, you should add the | |
2535 | following router at the end: | |
2536 | ||
2537 | ==> unknown: | |
2538 | driver = manualroute | |
2539 | transport = remote_smtp | |
2540 | route_list = * server.host.name | |
2541 | no_verify | |
2542 | ||
2543 | However, you should if possible try to verify that the user is known on | |
2544 | the central server before accepting the message in the first place. This | |
2545 | can be done by making use of Exim's ``call forward'' facility. | |
2546 | ||
2547 | ||
2548 | Q0404: How can I arrange for messages submitted by (for example) Majordomo to | |
2549 | be handled specially? | |
2550 | ||
2551 | A0404: You can use the \condition\ option on a router, with a setting such as | |
2552 | ||
2553 | ==> condition = ${if and {{eq {$sender_host_address}{}} \ | |
2554 | {eq {$sender_ident}{majordom}}} {yes}{no}} | |
2555 | ||
2556 | This first tests for a locally-submitted message, by ensuring there is | |
2557 | no sending host address, and then it checks the identity of the user | |
2558 | that ran the submitting process. | |
2559 | ||
2560 | ||
2561 | Q0405: On a host that accepts mail for several domains, do I have to use fully | |
2562 | qualified addresses in \(/etc/aliases)\ or do I have to set up an alias | |
2563 | file for each domain? | |
2564 | ||
2565 | A0405: You can do it either way. The default aliasing router contains this line: | |
2566 | ||
2567 | ==> data = ${lookup{$local_part}lsearch{/etc/aliases}} | |
2568 | ||
2569 | which is what does the actual lookup. To make it look up the complete | |
2570 | address instead of just the local part, use | |
2571 | ||
2572 | ==> data = ${lookup{$local_part@$domain}lsearch{/etc/aliases}} | |
2573 | ||
2574 | If you want to use a separate file for each domain, use | |
2575 | ||
2576 | ==> data = ${lookup{$local_part}lsearch{/etc/aliases/$domain}} | |
2577 | ||
2578 | ||
2579 | Q0406: Some of my users are using the \(.forward)\ to pipe to a shell command which | |
2580 | appends to the user's INBOX. How can I forbid this? | |
2581 | ||
2582 | A0406: If you allow your users to run shells in pipes, you cannot control which | |
2583 | commands they run or which files they write to. However, you should point | |
2584 | out to them that writing to an INBOX by arbitrary commands is not | |
2585 | interlocked with the MTA and MUAs, and is liable to mess up the contents | |
2586 | of the file. | |
2587 | ||
2588 | If a user simply wants to choose a specific file for the delivery of | |
2589 | messages, this can be done by putting a file name in a \(.forward)\ file | |
2590 | rather than using a pipe, or by using the \"save"\ command in an Exim | |
2591 | filter file. | |
2592 | ||
2593 | You can set \forbid_pipe\ on the router, but that will prevent them from | |
2594 | running any pipe commands at all. Alternatively, you can restrict which | |
2595 | commands they may run in their pipes by setting the \allow_commands\ | |
2596 | and/or \restrict_to_path\ options in the \%address_pipe%\ transport. | |
2597 | ||
2598 | ||
2599 | Q0407: How can I arrange for a default value when using a query-style lookup | |
2600 | such as LDAP or NIS+ to handle aliases? | |
2601 | ||
2602 | A0407: Use a second query in the failure part of the original lookup, like | |
2603 | this: | |
2604 | ||
2605 | ==> data = ${lookup ldap\ | |
2606 | {ldap://x.y.z/l=yvr?aliasaddress?sub?(&(mail=$local_part@$domain))}\ | |
2607 | {$value}\ | |
2608 | {\ | |
2609 | ${lookup ldap \ | |
2610 | {ldap://x.y.z/l=yvr?aliasaddress?sub?(&(mail=default@$domain))}}\ | |
2611 | }} | |
2612 | ||
2613 | Of course, if the default is a fixed value you can just include it | |
2614 | directly. | |
2615 | ||
2616 | ||
2617 | Q0408: If I don't fully qualify the addresses in a virtual domain's alias file | |
2618 | then mail to aliases which also match the local domain get delivered to | |
2619 | the local domain. | |
2620 | ||
2621 | A0408: Set the \qualify_preserve_domain\ option on the \%redirect%\ router. | |
2622 | ||
2623 | ||
2624 | Q0409: I want mail for any local part at certain virtual domains to go | |
2625 | to a single address for each domain. | |
2626 | ||
2627 | A0409: One way to to this is | |
2628 | ||
2629 | ==> virtual: | |
2630 | driver = redirect | |
2631 | data = ${lookup{$domain}lsearch{/etc/virtual}} | |
2632 | ||
2633 | The \(/etc/virtual)\ file contains a list of domains and the addresses to | |
2634 | which their mail should be sent. For example: | |
2635 | ||
2636 | ==> domain1: postmaster@some.where.else | |
2637 | domain2: joe@xyz.plc | |
2638 | ||
2639 | If the number of domains is large, using a DBM or cdb file would be more | |
2640 | efficient. If the lookup fails to find the domain in the file, the value | |
2641 | of the \data\ option is empty, causing the router to decline. | |
2642 | ||
2643 | ||
2644 | Q0410: How can I make Exim look in the alias NIS map instead of \(/etc/aliases)\? | |
2645 | ||
2646 | A0410: The default configuration does not use NIS (many hosts don't run it). | |
2647 | You need to change this line in the \%system_aliases%\ router: | |
2648 | ||
2649 | ==> data = ${lookup{$local_part}lsearch{/etc/aliases}} | |
2650 | ||
2651 | Change it to | |
2652 | ||
2653 | ==> data = ${lookup{$local_part}nis{mail.aliases}} | |
2654 | ||
2655 | If you want to use \(/etc/aliases)\ as well as NIS, put this router (with | |
2656 | a different name) before or after the default one, depending on which | |
2657 | data source you want to take precedence. | |
2658 | ||
2659 | ||
2660 | Q0411: Why will Exim deliver a message locally to any username that is longer | |
2661 | than 8 characters as long as the first 8 characters match one of the | |
2662 | local usernames? | |
2663 | ||
2664 | A0411: The problem is in your operating system. Exim just calls the \^^getpwnam()^^\ | |
2665 | function to test a local part for being a local login name. It does not | |
2666 | presume to guess the maximum length of user name for the underlying | |
2667 | operating system. Many operating systems correctly reject names that are | |
2668 | longer than the maximum length; yours is apparently deficient in this | |
2669 | regard. To cope with such systems, Exim has an option called | |
2670 | \max_user_name_length\ which you can set to the maximum allowed length. | |
2671 | ||
2672 | ||
2673 | Q0412: Why am I seeing the error \*bad mode (100664) for /home/test/.forward*\? | |
2674 | I've looked through the documentation but can't see anything to suggest | |
2675 | that Exim has to do anything other than read the \(.forward)\ file. | |
2676 | ||
2677 | A0412: For security, Exim checks for mode bits that shouldn't be set, by | |
2678 | default 022. You can change this by setting the \modemask\ option of the | |
2679 | \%redirect%\ router that is handling \(.forward)\ files. | |
2680 | ||
2681 | ||
2682 | Q0413: When a user's \(.forward)\ file is syntactially invalid, Exim defers | |
2683 | delivery of all messages to that user, which sometimes include the | |
2684 | user's own test messages. Can it be told to ignore the \(.forward)\ file | |
2685 | and/or inform the user of the error? | |
2686 | ||
2687 | A0413: Setting \skip_syntax_errors\ on the redirect router causes syntax | |
2688 | errors to be skipped. When dealing with users' \(.forward)\ files it is best | |
2689 | to combine this with a setting of \syntax_errors_to\ in order to send | |
2690 | a message about the error to the user. However, to avoid an infinite | |
2691 | cascade of messages, you have to be able to send to an address that | |
2692 | bypasses \(.forward)\ file processing. This can be done by including a | |
2693 | router like this one | |
2694 | ||
2695 | ==> real_localuser: | |
2696 | driver = accept | |
2697 | check_local_user | |
2698 | transport = local_delivery | |
2699 | prefix = real- | |
2700 | ||
2701 | before the \%redirect%\ router that handles \(.forward)\ files. This will | |
2702 | do an ordinary local delivery without \(.forward)\ processing, if the | |
2703 | local part is prefixed by \"real-"\. You can then set something like | |
2704 | the following options on the \%redirect%\ router: | |
2705 | ||
2706 | ==> skip_syntax_errors | |
2707 | syntax_errors_to = real-$local_part@$domain | |
2708 | syntax_errors_text = "\ | |
2709 | This is an automatically generated message. An error has been \ | |
2710 | found\nin your .forward file. Details of the error are reported \ | |
2711 | below. While\nthis error persists, messages addressed to you will \ | |
2712 | get delivered into\nyour normal mailbox and you will receive a \ | |
2713 | copy of this message for\neach one." | |
2714 | ||
2715 | A final tidying setting to go with this is a rewriting rule that changes | |
2716 | \"real-username"\ into just \"username"\ in the headers of the message: | |
2717 | ||
2718 | ==> \N^real-([^@]+)@your\.dom\.ain$\N $1@your.dom.ain h | |
2719 | ||
2720 | This means that users won't ever see the \"real-"\ prefix, unless they | |
2721 | look at the ::Envelope-To:: header. | |
2722 | ||
2723 | ||
2724 | Q0414: I have set \caseful_local_part\ on the routers that handle my local | |
2725 | domain because my users have upper case letters in their login names, | |
2726 | but incoming mail now has to use the correct case. Can I relax this | |
2727 | somehow? | |
2728 | ||
2729 | A0414: If you really have to live with caseful user names but want incoming | |
2730 | local parts to be caseless, then you have to maintain a file, indexed by | |
2731 | the lower case forms, that gives the correct case for each login, like | |
2732 | this: | |
2733 | ||
2734 | ==> admin: Admin | |
2735 | steven: Steven | |
2736 | mcdonald: McDonald | |
2737 | lamanch: LaManche | |
2738 | ... | |
2739 | ||
2740 | and at the start of the routers that handle your local domain, put one | |
2741 | like this: | |
2742 | ||
2743 | ==> set_case_router: | |
2744 | driver = redirect | |
2745 | data = ${lookup{${lc:$local_part}}lsearch{/the/file}} | |
2746 | qualify_preserve_domain | |
2747 | ||
2748 | For efficiency, you should also set the \redirect_router\ option to cause | |
2749 | processing of the changed address to begin at the next router. If you | |
2750 | are otherwise using the default configuration, the setting would be | |
2751 | ||
2752 | ==> redirect_router = system_aliases | |
2753 | ||
2754 | If there are lots of users, then a DBM or cdb file would be more | |
2755 | efficient than a linear search. If you are handling several domains, | |
2756 | you will have to extend this configuration to cope appropriately. | |
2757 | ||
2758 | ||
2759 | Q0415: Can I use my existing alias files and forward files as well as procmail | |
2760 | and effectively drop in Exim in place of Sendmail ? | |
2761 | ||
2762 | A0415: Yes, as long as your alias and forward files don't assume that pipes are | |
2763 | going to run under a shell. If they do, you either have to change them, | |
2764 | or configure Exim to use a shell (which it doesn't by default). | |
2765 | ||
2766 | ||
2767 | Q0416: What is quickest way to set up Exim so any message sent to a | |
2768 | non-existing user would bounce back with a different message, based | |
2769 | on the name of non-existing user? | |
2770 | ||
2771 | A0416: Place this router last, so that it catches any local addresses that | |
2772 | are not otherwise handled: | |
2773 | ||
2774 | ==> non_exist: | |
2775 | driver = accept | |
2776 | transport = non_exist_reply | |
2777 | no_verify | |
2778 | ||
2779 | Then add the following transport to the transports section: | |
2780 | ||
2781 | ==> non_exist_reply: | |
2782 | driver = autoreply | |
2783 | user = exim | |
2784 | to = $sender_address | |
2785 | subject = User does not exist | |
2786 | text = You sent mail to $local_part. That's not a valid user here. \ | |
2787 | The subject was: $subject. | |
2788 | ||
2789 | If you want to pick up a message from a file, you can use the \file\ | |
2790 | option (use \file_expand\ if you want its contents expanded). | |
2791 | ||
2792 | ||
2793 | Q0417: What do I need to do to make Exim handle \(/usr/ucb/vacation)\ processing | |
2794 | automatically, so that people could just create a \(.vacation.msg)\ file in | |
2795 | their home directory and not have to edit their \(.forward)\ file? | |
2796 | ||
2797 | A0417: Add a new router like this, immediately before the normal \%localuser%\ | |
2798 | router: | |
2799 | ||
2800 | ==> vacation: | |
2801 | driver = accept | |
2802 | check_local_user | |
2803 | require_files = $home/.vacation.msg | |
2804 | transport = vacation_transport | |
2805 | unseen | |
2806 | ||
2807 | and a matching new transport like this: | |
2808 | ||
2809 | ==> vacation_transport: | |
2810 | driver = pipe | |
2811 | command = /usr/ucb/vacation $local_part | |
2812 | ||
2813 | However, some versions of \(/usr/ucb/vacation)\ do not work properly unless | |
2814 | the DBM file(s) it uses are created in advance - it won't create them | |
2815 | itself. You also need a way of removing them when the vacation is over. | |
2816 | ||
2817 | Another possibility is to use a fixed filter file which is run whenever | |
2818 | \(.vacation.msg)\ exists, for example: | |
2819 | ||
2820 | ==> vacation: | |
2821 | driver = redirect | |
2822 | check_local_user | |
2823 | require_files = $home/.vacation.msg | |
2824 | file = /some/central/filter | |
2825 | allow_filter | |
2826 | ||
2827 | The filter file should use the \"if personal"\ check before sending mail, | |
2828 | to avoid generating automatic responses to mailing lists. If sending a | |
2829 | message is all that it does, this doesn't count as a ``significant'' | |
2830 | delivery, so the original message goes on to be delivered as normal. | |
2831 | ||
2832 | Yet another possibility is to make use of Exim's \%autoreply%\ transport, | |
2833 | and not use \(/usr/ucb/vacation)\ at all. | |
2834 | ||
2835 | ||
2836 | Q0418: I want to use a default entry in my alias file to handle unknown local | |
2837 | parts, but it picks up the local parts that the aliases generate. For | |
2838 | example, if the alias file is | |
2839 | ||
2840 | ==> luke.skywalker: luke | |
2841 | ls: luke | |
2842 | *: postmaster | |
2843 | ||
2844 | then messages addressed to \/luke.skywalker/\ end up at \/postmaster/\. | |
2845 | ||
2846 | A0418: The default mechanism works best with virtual domains, where the | |
2847 | generated address is not in the same domain. If you just want to pick up | |
2848 | all unknown local parts and send them to postmaster, an easier way to do | |
2849 | it is to put this as your last router: | |
2850 | ||
2851 | ==> unknown: | |
2852 | driver = redirect | |
2853 | data = postmaster | |
2854 | no_verify | |
2855 | ||
2856 | Another possibility is to put the redirect router for these aliases | |
2857 | after all the other routers, so that local parts which are user names | |
2858 | get picked off first. You will need to have two aliasing routers if | |
2859 | there are some local parts (e.g. \/root/\) which are login names, but which | |
2860 | you want to handle as aliases. | |
2861 | ||
2862 | ||
2863 | Q0419: I have some obsolete domains which people have been warned not to use | |
2864 | any more. How can I arrange to delete any mail that is sent to them? | |
2865 | ||
2866 | A0419: To reject them at SMTP time, with a customized error message, place | |
2867 | statments like this in the ACL: | |
2868 | ||
2869 | ==> deny message = The domain $domain is obsolete | |
2870 | domains = lsearch;/etc/exim/obsolete.domains | |
2871 | ||
2872 | For messages that don't arrive over SMTP, you can use a router like | |
2873 | this to bounce them: | |
2874 | ||
2875 | ==> obsolete: | |
2876 | driver = redirect | |
2877 | domains = lsearch;/etc/exim/obsolete.domains | |
2878 | allow_fail | |
2879 | data = :fail: the domain $domain is obsolete | |
2880 | ||
2881 | If you just want to throw away mail to those domains, accept them at | |
2882 | SMTP time, and use a router like this: | |
2883 | ||
2884 | ==> obsolete: | |
2885 | domains = lsearch;/etc/exim/obsolete.domains | |
2886 | data = :blackhole: | |
2887 | ||
2888 | ||
2889 | Q0420: How can I arrange that mail addressed to \(anything@something.mydomain.com)\ | |
2890 | gets delivered to \(something@mydomain.com)\? | |
2891 | ||
2892 | A0420: Set up a router like this: | |
2893 | ||
2894 | ==> user_from_domain: | |
2895 | driver = redirect | |
2896 | data = ${if match{$domain}{\N^(.+)\.mydomain\.com$\N}\ | |
2897 | {$1@mydomain.com}} | |
2898 | ||
2899 | ||
2900 | Q0421: I can't get a regular expression to work in a \local_parts\ option on | |
2901 | one of my routers. | |
2902 | ||
2903 | A0421: Have you remembered to protect any backslash and dollar characters in | |
2904 | your regex from unwanted expansion? The easiest way is to use the | |
2905 | \"@\N"\ facility, like this: | |
2906 | ||
2907 | ==> local_parts = \N^0740\d{6}\N | |
2908 | ||
2909 | ||
2910 | Q0422: How can I arrange for all addresses in a group of domains \(*.example.com)\ | |
2911 | to share the same alias file? I have a number of such groups. | |
2912 | ||
2913 | A0422: For a single group you could just hard wire the file name into a router | |
2914 | that had | |
2915 | ||
2916 | ==> domains = *.example.com | |
2917 | ||
2918 | set, to restrict it to the relevant domains. For a number of such groups | |
2919 | you can create a file containing the domains, like this: | |
2920 | ||
2921 | ==> *.example1.com example1.com | |
2922 | *.example2.com example2.com | |
2923 | ... | |
2924 | ||
2925 | Then create a router like this | |
2926 | ||
2927 | ==> domain_aliases: | |
2928 | driver = redirect | |
2929 | domains = partial-lsearch;/that/file | |
2930 | data = ${lookup{$local_part}lsearch*{/etc/aliases.d/$domain_data}} | |
2931 | ||
2932 | The variable \$domain_data$\ contains the data that was looked up when the | |
2933 | \domains\ option was matched, i.e. \"example1.com"\, \"example2.com"\, etc. | |
2934 | in this case. | |
2935 | ||
2936 | ||
2937 | Q0423: Some of our users have no home directories; the field in the password | |
2938 | file contains \(/no/home/dir)\. This causes the error \*failed to stat | |
2939 | /no/home/dir (No such file or directory)*\ when Exim tries to look for a | |
2940 | \(.forward file)\, and the delivery is deferred. | |
2941 | ||
2942 | A0423: There are two issues involved here: | |
2943 | ||
2944 | (1) With the default configuration, you are asking Exim to check for a | |
2945 | \(.forward)\ file in the user's home directory. If no file is found, | |
2946 | Exim tries to \^^stat()^^\ the home directory. This is so that it will | |
2947 | notice a missing NFS home directory, and not treat it as if the | |
2948 | \(.forward)\ file did not exist. This \^^stat()^^\ is failing when the | |
2949 | home directory really doesn't exist. You should arrange for the | |
2950 | \%userforward%\ router not to run for these special users, by adding | |
2951 | this line: | |
2952 | ||
2953 | ==> condition = ${if eq {$home}{/no/home/dir}{no}{yes}} | |
2954 | ||
2955 | (2) If you use \check_local_user\ on another router to route to a local | |
2956 | transport (again, this is what is in the default configuration), you | |
2957 | will also have to specify a current directory for the transport, because | |
2958 | by default it makes the home directory current. This is easily done by | |
2959 | adding | |
2960 | ||
2961 | ==> current_directory = / | |
2962 | ||
2963 | to the transport or | |
2964 | ||
2965 | ==> transport_current_directory = / | |
2966 | ||
2967 | to the router. Or you can add \home_directory\ to the transport, because | |
2968 | the current directory defaults to the home directory. | |
2969 | ||
2970 | ||
2971 | Q0424: How can I disable Exim's de-duplication features? I want it to do two | |
2972 | deliveries if two different aliases expand to the same address. | |
2973 | ||
2974 | A0424: This is not possible. Duplication has other ramifications other than | |
2975 | just (in)convenience. Consider: | |
2976 | ||
2977 | . Message is addressed to A and to B. | |
2978 | ||
2979 | . Both A and B are aliased to C. | |
2980 | ||
2981 | . Without de-duplication, two deliveries to C are scheduled. | |
2982 | ||
2983 | . One delivery happens, Exim records that it has delivered the message | |
2984 | to C. | |
2985 | ||
2986 | . The next delivery fails (C's mailbox is over quota, say). | |
2987 | ||
2988 | Next time round, Exim wants to know if it has already delivered to C or | |
2989 | not, before scheduling a new delivery. Has it? Obviously, if duplicate | |
2990 | deliveries are supported, it has to remember not only that it has | |
2991 | delivered to C but also the ``history'' of how that delivery happened - in | |
2992 | effect an ancestry list back to the original envelope address. This it | |
2993 | does not do, and changing it to work in that way would be a lot of work | |
2994 | and a big upheaval. | |
2995 | ||
2996 | The best way to get duplicate deliveries if you want them is not to use | |
2997 | aliases, but to route the addresses directly to a transport, e.g. | |
2998 | ||
2999 | ==> duplicates: | |
3000 | driver = accept | |
3001 | local_parts = lsearch;/etc/list/of/special/local/parts | |
3002 | transport = local_delivery | |
3003 | user = exim | |
3004 | ||
3005 | ||
3006 | Q0425: My users' mailboxes are distributed between several servers according to | |
3007 | the first letter of the user name. All the servers receive incoming mail | |
3008 | at random. I would like to have the same configuration file for all the | |
3009 | servers, which does local delivery for the mailboxes it holds, and sends | |
3010 | other addresses to the correct other server. Is this possible? | |
3011 | ||
3012 | A0425: It is easiest if you arrange for all the users to have password entries | |
3013 | on all the servers. This means that non-existent users can be detected | |
3014 | at the first server they reach. Set up a file containing a mapping from | |
3015 | the first letter of the user names to the servers where their mailboxes | |
3016 | are held. For example: | |
3017 | ||
3018 | ==> a: server1 | |
3019 | b: server1 | |
3020 | c: server2 | |
3021 | ... | |
3022 | ||
3023 | Before the normal \%localuser%\ router, place the following router: | |
3024 | ||
3025 | ==> mailbox_host: | |
3026 | driver = manualroute | |
3027 | check_local_user | |
3028 | transport = remote_smtp | |
3029 | route_list = * ${lookup{${substr_0_1:$local_part}}lsearch{/etc/mapfile}} | |
3030 | self = pass | |
3031 | ||
3032 | This router checks for a local account, then looks up the host from the | |
3033 | first character of the local part. If the host is not the local host, | |
3034 | the address is routed to the \%remote_smtp%\ transport, and sent to the | |
3035 | correct host. If the host is the local host, the \self\ option causes | |
3036 | the router to pass the address to the next router, which does a local | |
3037 | delivery. | |
3038 | ||
3039 | The router is skipped for local parts that are not the names of local | |
3040 | users, and so these addresses fail. | |
3041 | ||
3042 | ||
3043 | Q0426: One of the things I want to set up is for \(anything@onedomain)\ to forward | |
3044 | to \(anything@anotherdomain)\. I tried adding \($local_part@anotherdomain)\ to | |
3045 | my aliases but it did not expand - it sent it to that literal address. | |
3046 | ||
3047 | A0426: If you want to do it that way, you can use the \"expand"\ operator on | |
3048 | the lookup used in the data option of the redirect router. For example: | |
3049 | ||
3050 | ==> data = ${expand:${lookup{$local_part}lsearch*{/etc/aliases}}} | |
3051 | ||
3052 | Another approach is to use a router like this: | |
3053 | ||
3054 | ==> forwarddomain: | |
3055 | driver = redirect | |
3056 | domains = onedomain | |
3057 | data = $local_part@anotherdomain | |
3058 | ||
3059 | The value of \data\ can, of course, be more complicated, involving | |
3060 | lookups etc. if you have lots of different cases. | |
3061 | ||
3062 | ||
3063 | Q0427: How can I have an address looked up in two different alias files, and | |
3064 | delivered to all the addresses that are found? | |
3065 | ||
3066 | A0427: Use a router like this: | |
3067 | ||
3068 | ==> multi_aliases: | |
3069 | driver = redirect | |
3070 | data = ${lookup{$local_part}lsearch{/etc/aliases1}\ | |
3071 | {$value${lookup{$local_part}lsearch{/etc/aliases2}{,$value}}}\ | |
3072 | {${lookup{$local_part}lsearch{/etc/aliases2}{$value}fail}}}\ | |
3073 | ||
3074 | If the first lookup succeeds, the result is its data, followed by the | |
3075 | data from the second lookup, if any, separated by a comma. If the first | |
3076 | lookup fails, the result is the data from the third lookup (which also | |
3077 | looks in the second file), but if this also fails, the entire expansion | |
3078 | is forced to fail, thereby causing the router to decline. | |
3079 | ||
3080 | Another approach is to use two routers, with the first re-generating the | |
3081 | original local part when it succeeds. This won't get processed by the | |
3082 | same router again. For example: | |
3083 | ||
3084 | ==> multi_aliases1: | |
3085 | driver = redirect | |
3086 | data = ${lookup{$local_part}lsearch{/etc/aliases1}{$value,$local_part}} | |
3087 | ||
3088 | ==> multi_aliases2: | |
3089 | data = ${lookup{$local_part}lsearch{/etc/aliases2}} | |
3090 | ||
3091 | This scales more easily to three or more alias files. | |
3092 | ||
3093 | ||
3094 | Q0428: I've converted from Sendmail, and I notice that Exim doesn't make use | |
3095 | of the \"owner-"\ entries in my alias file to change the sender address in | |
3096 | outgoing messages to a mailing list. | |
3097 | ||
3098 | A0428: If you have an alias file with entries like this: | |
3099 | ||
3100 | ==> somelist: a@b, c@d, ... | |
3101 | owner-somelist: postmaster | |
3102 | ||
3103 | Sendmail assumes that the second entry specifies a new sender address | |
3104 | for the first. Exim does not make this assumption. However, you can make | |
3105 | it take the same action, by adding | |
3106 | ||
3107 | ==> errors_to = owner-$local_part@whatever.domain | |
3108 | ||
3109 | to the configuration for your aliasing router. This is fail-safe, | |
3110 | because Exim verifies a new sender address before using it. Thus, the | |
3111 | change of sender address occurs only when the owner entry exists. | |
3112 | ||
3113 | ||
3114 | Q0429: I would like to deliver mail addressed to a given domain to local | |
3115 | mailboxes, but also to generate messages to the envelope senders. | |
3116 | ||
3117 | A0429: You can do this with an ``unseen'' router and an \%autoreply%\ transport, | |
3118 | along the following lines: | |
3119 | ||
3120 | ==> # Router | |
3121 | auto_warning_r: | |
3122 | driver = accept | |
3123 | check_local_user | |
3124 | domains = <domains you want to do this for> | |
3125 | condition = ${if eq{$sender_address}{}{no}{yes}} | |
3126 | transport = warning_t | |
3127 | no_verify | |
3128 | unseen | |
3129 | ||
3130 | Place this router immediately before the normal \%localuser%\ router. The | |
3131 | \unseen\ option means that the address is still passed on to the next | |
3132 | router. The transport is configured like this: | |
3133 | ||
3134 | ==> # Transport | |
3135 | warning_t: | |
3136 | driver = autoreply | |
3137 | file = /usr/local/mail/warning.txt | |
3138 | file_expand | |
3139 | from = postmaster@your.domain | |
3140 | to = $sender_address | |
3141 | user = exim | |
3142 | subject = Re: Your mail to $local_part@$domain | |
3143 | ||
3144 | Note the use of the \condition\ option to avoid attempting to send a | |
3145 | message when there is no sender (that is, when the incoming message is a | |
3146 | bounce message). You can of course extend this to include other | |
3147 | conditions. If you want to log the sending of messages, you can add | |
3148 | ||
3149 | ==> log = /some/file | |
3150 | ||
3151 | to the transport and also make use of the \once\ option if you want to | |
3152 | send only one message to each sender. | |
3153 | ||
3154 | ||
3155 | Q0430: Whenever Exim tries to route a local address, it gives a permission | |
3156 | denied error for the \(.forward)\ file, like this: | |
3157 | ||
3158 | ==> 1998-08-10 16:55:32 0z5y2W-0000B8-00 == xxxx@yyy.zzz <xxxx@yyy.zz> | |
3159 | D=userforward defer (-1): failed to open /home/xxxx/.forward | |
3160 | (userforward router): Permission denied (euid=1234 egid=101) | |
3161 | ||
3162 | A0430: Have you remembered to make Exim setuid \/root/\? | |
3163 | ||
3164 | ||
3165 | Q0431: How do I configure Exim to allow arbitrary extensions in local parts, of | |
3166 | the form \/+extension/\? | |
3167 | ||
3168 | A0431: Add this pre-condition to the relevant router: | |
3169 | ||
3170 | ==> local_part_suffix = +* | |
3171 | ||
3172 | If you want the extensions to be optional, also add the option | |
3173 | ||
3174 | ==> local_part_suffix_optional | |
3175 | ||
3176 | When the router runs, \$local_part$\ contains the local part with the | |
3177 | extension removed, and the extension (if any) is in \$local_part_suffix$\. | |
3178 | If you have set \check_local_user\, the test is carried out after the | |
3179 | extension is removed. | |
3180 | ||
3181 | ||
3182 | Q0432: I use NIS for my user data. How can I stop Exim rejecting mail when my | |
3183 | NIS servers are being restarted? | |
3184 | ||
3185 | A0432: Exim doesn't know that you are using NIS; it just calls the \^^getpwnam()^^\ | |
3186 | function, which is routed by nsswitch. Unfortunately, \^^getpwnam()^^\ | |
3187 | was never designed to be routed through NIS, and it returns NULL if the | |
3188 | entry is not found or if the connection to the NIS server fails. This | |
3189 | means that Exim cannot tell the difference between ``no such user'' and | |
3190 | ``NIS is down''. | |
3191 | ||
3192 | Crutches to help with this problem are \finduser_retries\ in Exim, and | |
3193 | \^nscd^\ on the Unix side, but they are not perfect, and mail can still | |
3194 | be lost. However, Nico Erfurth pointed out that you can create a router | |
3195 | for Exim that tests for the availability of NIS, and force a defer if | |
3196 | NIS is not running: | |
3197 | ||
3198 | ==> check_nis: | |
3199 | driver = redirect | |
3200 | data = ${lookup {$local_part} nis {passwd}{}} | |
3201 | ||
3202 | This should be placed before any router that makes any use of NIS, | |
3203 | typically at the start of your local routers. How does it work? If | |
3204 | your NIS server is reachable, the lookup will take place, and whether it | |
3205 | succeeds or fails, the result is an empty strting. This causes the | |
3206 | router to decline, and the address is passed to the following routers. | |
3207 | If your NIS server is down, the lookup defers, and this causes the | |
3208 | router to defer. A verification of an incoming address gets a temporary | |
3209 | rejection, and a delivery is deferred till later. | |
3210 | ||
3211 | ||
3212 | Q0433: How can I arrange for a single address to be processed by \*both*\ | |
3213 | \%redirect%\ \*and*\ \%accept%\? | |
3214 | ||
3215 | A0433: Check out the \unseen\ option. | |
3216 | ||
3217 | ||
3218 | Q0434: How can I redirect all local parts that are not in my system aliases to | |
3219 | a single address? I tried using an asterisk in the system alias file | |
3220 | with an \"lsearch*"\ lookup, but that send \*all*\ messages to the | |
3221 | default address. | |
3222 | ||
3223 | A0434: If your alias file generates addresses in the local domain, they are | |
3224 | also processed as a potential aliases. For example, suppose this is your | |
3225 | alias file: | |
3226 | ||
3227 | ==> caesar: jc | |
3228 | anthony: ma | |
3229 | *: brutus | |
3230 | ||
3231 | The local part \/caesar/\ is aliased to \/jc/\, but that address is then | |
3232 | reprocessed by the routers. As the address is in the local domain, the | |
3233 | alias file is again consulted, and this time the default matches. In | |
3234 | fact after the second aliasing, \/brutus/\ is also processed again from | |
3235 | the start, and is aliased to itself. However, this happens only once, | |
3236 | because the next time, Exim notices that the aliasing router has already | |
3237 | processed \/brutus/\, so the router is skipped in order to avoid | |
3238 | looping. | |
3239 | ||
3240 | There are several ways of solving this problem; which one you use | |
3241 | depends on your aliasing data. | |
3242 | ||
3243 | (1) If the result of aliasing is always a local user name, that is, | |
3244 | aliasing never generates another alias, you can use the | |
3245 | \redirect_router\ option on the router to specify that processing | |
3246 | the generated addresses must start at the next router. For example: | |
3247 | ||
3248 | ==> redirect_router = userforward | |
3249 | ||
3250 | assuming that the next router is called \%userforward%\. This | |
3251 | ensures that there is at most one pass through the aliasing router. | |
3252 | ||
3253 | (2) If you cannot rely on aliases generating non-aliases, it is often | |
3254 | easier not to use a default alias, but instead to place a router | |
3255 | such as the one below after all the other local routers (for the | |
3256 | relevant domains): | |
3257 | ||
3258 | ==> catch_unknown: | |
3259 | driver = redirect | |
3260 | domains = ... | |
3261 | data = brutus@$domain | |
3262 | ||
3263 | Note that the default aliasing technique works more successfully for | |
3264 | virtual domains (see Q0401) because the generated address for the | |
3265 | default is not usually in the same virtual domain as the incoming | |
3266 | address. | |
3267 | ||
3268 | ||
3269 | Q0435: My alias file contains fully qualified addresses as keys, and some | |
3270 | wildcard domains in the form @foo.bar. Can Exim handle these? | |
3271 | ||
3272 | A0435: You can handle fully qualified addresses with this router: | |
3273 | ||
3274 | ==> qualified_aliases: | |
3275 | driver = redirect | |
3276 | data = ${lookup{$local_part@$domain}lsearch{/etc/aliases}} | |
3277 | ||
3278 | (Add any other options you need for the \%redirect%\ router.) Place this | |
3279 | router either before or after the default aliases router that looks up | |
3280 | the local part only. (Or, if you have no unqualified aliases, replace | |
3281 | the default router.) | |
3282 | ||
3283 | To handle wildcards in the form @foo.bar you will need yet another | |
3284 | router. (Wildcards of the form *@foo.bar can be handled by an lsearch*@ | |
3285 | lookup.) Something like this: | |
3286 | ||
3287 | ==> wildcard_aliases: | |
3288 | driver = redirect | |
3289 | data = ${lookup{@$domain}lsearch{/etc/aliases}} | |
3290 | ||
3291 | Place this after the routers that handle the more specific aliases. | |
3292 | ||
3293 | ||
3294 | ||
3295 | 5. FILTERING | |
3296 | ||
3297 | Q0501: My filter isn't working. How can I test it? | |
3298 | ||
3299 | A0501: Use the \-bf-\ option (\-bF-\ for a system filter) to test the basic operation | |
3300 | of your filter. You can request debugging information for filtering only | |
3301 | by adding \"-d-all+filter"\ to the command. | |
3302 | ||
3303 | ||
3304 | Q0502: What I really need is the ability to obtain the result of a pipe | |
3305 | command so that I can filter externally and redirect internally. Is | |
3306 | this possible? | |
3307 | ||
3308 | A0502: The result of a pipe command is not available to a filter, because Exim | |
3309 | does not run any actual deliveries while filtering. It just sets up | |
3310 | deliveries at this time. They all actually happen later. If you want to | |
3311 | run pipes and examine their results, you need to set up a single | |
3312 | delivery to a delivery agent such as \^procmail^\ which provides this kind | |
3313 | of facility. | |
3314 | ||
3315 | An possible alternative is to use the \"${run"\ expansion item to run an | |
3316 | external command while filtering. In this case, you can make use of some | |
3317 | of the results of the command. | |
3318 | ||
3319 | ||
3320 | Q0503: I received a message with a ::Subject:: line that contained a non-printing | |
3321 | character (a carriage return). This messed up my filter file. Is there a | |
3322 | way to get round it? | |
3323 | ||
3324 | A0503: Instead of \"$h_subject:"\ use \"${escape:$h_subject:}"\ | |
3325 | ||
3326 | ||
3327 | Q0504: I want to search for \"$"\ in the subject line, but I can't seem to get | |
3328 | the syntax. | |
3329 | ||
3330 | A0504: Try one of these: | |
3331 | ||
3332 | ==> if $h_subject: contains \$ then ... | |
3333 | if $h_subject: contains "\\$" then ... | |
3334 | ||
3335 | ||
3336 | Q0505: My problem is that Exim replaces \$local_part$\ with an empty string in the | |
3337 | system filtering. What's wrong or what did I miss? | |
3338 | ||
3339 | A0505: A message may have many recipients. The system filter is run just once | |
3340 | at the start of a delivery attempt. Consequently, it does not make sense | |
3341 | to set \$local_part$\. Which recipient should it be set to? However, you | |
3342 | can access all the recipients from a system filter via the variable | |
3343 | called \$recipients$\. | |
3344 | ||
3345 | ||
3346 | Q0506: Using \$recipients$\ in a system filter gives me another problem: how can | |
3347 | I do a string lookup if \$recipients$\ is a list of addresses? | |
3348 | ||
3349 | A0506: Check out the section of the filter specification called \*Testing a list of | |
3350 | addresses*\. If that doesn't help, you may have to resort to calling an | |
3351 | embedded Perl interpreter - but that is expensive. | |
3352 | ||
3353 | ||
3354 | Q0507: What are the main differences between using an Exim filter and using | |
3355 | \^procmail^\? | |
3356 | ||
3357 | A0507: Exim filters and \^procmail^\ provide different facilities. Exim filters run | |
3358 | at routing time, before any deliveries are done. A filter is like a | |
3359 | ``\(.forward)\ file with conditions''. One of the benefits is de-duplication. | |
3360 | Another is that if you forward, you are forwarding the original message. | |
3361 | ||
3362 | However, this does mean that pipes etc. are not run at filtering time, | |
3363 | nor can you change the headers, because the message may have other | |
3364 | recipients and Exim keeps only a single set of headers. | |
3365 | ||
3366 | \^procmail^\ runs at delivery time. This is for one recipient only, and so | |
3367 | it can change headers, run pipes and check the results, etc. However, if | |
3368 | it wants to forward, it has to create a new message containing a copy | |
3369 | of the original message. | |
3370 | ||
3371 | It's your choice as to which of these you use. You can of course use | |
3372 | both. | |
3373 | ||
3374 | ||
3375 | Q0508: How can I allow the use of relative paths in users' filter files when | |
3376 | the directories concerned are not available from the password data? | |
3377 | ||
3378 | A0508: You need to be running Exim 4.11 or later. You can then specify a value | |
3379 | for \$home$\ by setting the router_home_directory option on the | |
3380 | \%redirect%\ router. | |
3381 | ||
3382 | For earlier releases, there is no way to specify the value of \$home$\ | |
3383 | for a \%redirect%\ router; it either comes from the password data as a | |
3384 | result of \check_local_user\, or is unset. | |
3385 | ||
3386 | ||
3387 | Q0509: How can I set up a filter file to detect and block virus attachments? | |
3388 | ||
3389 | A0509: Exim's filter facilities aren't powerful enough to do much more than | |
3390 | very crude testing. Most people that want virus checking are nowadays | |
3391 | using one of the separate scanning programs such as \^exiscan^\ (see | |
3392 | \?http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/?\). There is some further information | |
3393 | about scanning with Exim via \?http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/exim.php?\. | |
3394 | ||
3395 | ||
3396 | Q0510: Is it possible to write code for scanning messages in Python? | |
3397 | ||
3398 | A0510: \^elspy^\ is a layer of glue code that enables you to write Python code | |
3399 | to scan email messages at SMTP time. \^elspy^\ also includes a small | |
3400 | Python library with common mail-scanning tools, including an interface | |
3401 | to SpamAssassin and a simple but effective virus detector. You can | |
3402 | optain \^elspy^\ from \?http://elspy.sourceforge.net/?\. | |
3403 | ||
3404 | ||
3405 | Q0511: Whenever my system filter uses a \mail\ command to send a message, I get | |
3406 | the error \*User 0 set for address_reply transport is on the never_users | |
3407 | list*\. What does this mean? | |
3408 | ||
3409 | A0511: The system filter runs as \/root/\ in Exim 4, unless you set | |
3410 | \system_filter_user\ to specify otherwise. When you set up a delivery | |
3411 | direct from a system filter (an autoreply is a special kind of | |
3412 | ``delivery'') the transport runs as the same user, unless it has a | |
3413 | \user\ setting of its own. Normally, deliveries are not allowed to run | |
3414 | as \/root/\ as a security precaution; this is implemented by the | |
3415 | \never_users\ option. | |
3416 | ||
3417 | The easiest solution is to add this to your configuration: | |
3418 | ||
3419 | ==> system_filter_user = exim | |
3420 | ||
3421 | The system filter then runs as \/exim/\ instead of \/root/\. | |
3422 | Alternatively, you can arrange for autoreplies from the system filter to | |
3423 | use a special transport of their own, and set the \user\ option on that | |
3424 | transport. | |
3425 | ||
3426 | ||
3427 | Q0512: I'm trying to reference the ::Envelope-To:: header in my filter, but | |
3428 | \$h_envelope-to:$\ is always empty. | |
3429 | ||
3430 | A0512: ::Envelope-To:: is added at delivery time, by the transport. Therefore, | |
3431 | the header doesn't exist at filter time. In a user filter, the values | |
3432 | you probably want are in \$original_local_part$\ and | |
3433 | \$original_domain$\. In a system filter, the complete list of all | |
3434 | envelope recipients is in \$recipients$\. | |
3435 | ||
3436 | ||
3437 | Q0513: I want my system filter to freeze all mails greater than 500K in size, | |
3438 | but to exclude those to a specific domain. However, I don't seem to be | |
3439 | able to use \$domain$\ in a system filter. | |
3440 | ||
3441 | A0513: You cannot do this in a system filter, because a single message may have | |
3442 | multiple recipients, some in the special domain, and some not. That is | |
3443 | also the reason why \$domain$\ is not set in a system filter. | |
3444 | ||
3445 | If you want to take actions on a per-recipient basis, you have to do it | |
3446 | in a router. However, freezing is not appropriate, because freezing | |
3447 | stops all deliveries. You could, however, delay delivery to all but the | |
3448 | special domains by using something like this: | |
3449 | ||
3450 | ==> delay_if_too_big: | |
3451 | driver = redirect | |
3452 | domains = !the.special.domain | |
3453 | condition = ${if >{$message_size}{500K}{yes}{no}} | |
3454 | allow_defer | |
3455 | data = :defer: message too big. | |
3456 | ||
3457 | However, there isn't an easy way of ``releasing'' such messages at | |
3458 | present. | |
3459 | ||
3460 | ||
3461 | Q0514: When I try to send to two addresses I get an error in the filter | |
3462 | file \*malformed address: , e@fgh.com may not follow a@bcd.com*\. What | |
3463 | is going on? | |
3464 | ||
3465 | A0514: Have you got | |
3466 | ||
3467 | ==> deliver "a@bcd.com, e@fgh.com" | |
3468 | ||
3469 | in your filter? If so, that is your problem. You should have | |
3470 | ||
3471 | ==> deliver a@bcd.com | |
3472 | deliver e@fgh.com | |
3473 | ||
3474 | Each \deliver\ command expects just one address. | |
3475 | ||
3476 | ||
3477 | ||
3478 | 6. DELIVERY | |
3479 | ||
3480 | Q0601: What does the error \*Neither the xxx router nor the yyy transport set | |
3481 | a uid for local delivery of...*\ mean? | |
3482 | ||
3483 | A0601: Whenever Exim does a local delivery, it runs a process under a specific | |
3484 | user and group id (uid and gid). For deliveries into mailboxes, and to | |
3485 | pipes and files set up by forwarding, it normally picks up the uid/gid | |
3486 | of the receiving user. However, if an address is directed to a pipe or a | |
3487 | file by some other means, such an entry in the system alias file of the | |
3488 | form | |
3489 | ||
3490 | ==> majordomo: |/local/mail/majordomo ... | |
3491 | ||
3492 | then Exim has to be told what uid/gid to use for the delivery. This can | |
3493 | be done either on the routerr that handles the address, or on the | |
3494 | transport that actually does the delivery. If a pipe is going to run a | |
3495 | setuid program, then it doesn't matter what uid Exim starts it out with, | |
3496 | and so the most straightforward thing is to put | |
3497 | ||
3498 | ==> user = exim | |
3499 | ||
3500 | on either the router or the transport. A setting on the transport | |
3501 | overrides a setting on the router, so if the same transport is being | |
3502 | used with several routers, you should set the user on it only if you | |
3503 | want the same uid to be used in all cases. | |
3504 | ||
3505 | In the default configuration, the transports used for file and pipe | |
3506 | deliveries are the ones called \address_file\ and \address_pipe\. You | |
3507 | can specify different transports by setting, for example, | |
3508 | ||
3509 | ==> pipe_transport = special_pipe_transport | |
3510 | ||
3511 | on the \%system_aliases%\ router. Then you can set up \%special_pipe_transport%\ | |
3512 | ||
3513 | ==> special_pipe_transport: | |
3514 | driver = pipe | |
3515 | user = ???? | |
3516 | ||
3517 | which will be used only for pipe deliveries from that one router. | |
3518 | What you put for the ???? is up to you, and depends on the particular | |
3519 | circumstances. | |
3520 | ||
3521 | ||
3522 | Q0602: Exim keeps crashing with segmentation errors (signal 11 or 139) during | |
3523 | delivery. This seems to happen when it is about to contact a remote | |
3524 | host or when a delivery is deferred. | |
3525 | ||
3526 | A0602: This could be a problem with Exim's databases. Try running a delivery | |
3527 | with debugging turned on. If the last line of the debug output is | |
3528 | something like this: | |
3529 | ||
3530 | ==> locked /var/spool/exim/db/retry.lockfile | |
3531 | ||
3532 | the crash is happening inside the DBM library. Check that your DBM | |
3533 | library is correctly installed. In particular, if you have installed a | |
3534 | second DBM library onto a system that already had one, check that its | |
3535 | version of \(ndbm.h)\ is being seen first. For example, if the new | |
3536 | version is in \(/usr/local/include)\, check that there isn't another | |
3537 | version in \(/usr/include)\. If you are using Berkeley db, you can set | |
3538 | ||
3539 | ==> USE_DB=yes | |
3540 | ||
3541 | in your \(Local/Makefile)\ to avoid using \(ndbm.h)\ altogether. This is | |
3542 | particularly relevant for version 2 (or later) of Berkeley db, because | |
3543 | no \(ndbm.h)\ file is distributed with it. Another thing you can try is | |
3544 | to run | |
3545 | ||
3546 | ==> exim_dumpdb /var/spool/exim retry | |
3547 | ||
3548 | to see if it also crashes, or build the \^test_dbfn^\ tool and fiddle | |
3549 | around with it. If both fail, it is most almost certainly a problem with | |
3550 | your DBM library. You could try to update it, or force Exim to use | |
3551 | another library. See the file \(doc/dbm.discuss.txt)\ for hints about | |
3552 | this. | |
3553 | ||
3554 | ||
3555 | Q0603: How can mails that are being routed through routers that do not set | |
3556 | \check_local_user\ be delivered under the uid of the recipient? | |
3557 | ||
3558 | A0603: Q0601 contains background information on this. If you are using, say, an | |
3559 | alias file to direct messages to specific mailboxes, you can use | |
3560 | the \user\ option on either the router or the transport to set the uid. | |
3561 | What you put in the setting depends on how the required uid is to be | |
3562 | found. It could be looked up in a file or computed somehow from the | |
3563 | local part, for example. | |
3564 | ||
3565 | ||
3566 | Q0604: I want to use MMDF-style mailboxes. How can I get Exim to append the | |
3567 | ctrl-A characters that separate indvidual emails? | |
3568 | ||
3569 | A0604: Set the \message_suffix\ option in the \%appendfile%\ transport. In fact, | |
3570 | for MMDF mailboxes you need a prefix as well as a suffix to get it | |
3571 | working right, so your transport should contain these settings: | |
3572 | ||
3573 | ==> message_prefix = "\1\1\1\1\n" | |
3574 | message_suffix = "\1\1\1\1\n" | |
3575 | ||
3576 | Also, you need to change the \check_string\ and \escape_string\ settings so | |
3577 | that the escaping happens for lines in the message that happen to begin | |
3578 | with the MMDF prefix or suffix string, rather than ``From'' (the default): | |
3579 | ||
3580 | ==> check_string = "\1\1\1\1\n" | |
3581 | escape_string = "\1\1\1\1 \n" | |
3582 | ||
3583 | Adding a space to the line is sufficient to prevent it being taken as a | |
3584 | separator. | |
3585 | ||
3586 | ||
3587 | Q0605: If a user's mailbox is over quota, is there a way for me to set it up so | |
3588 | that the mail bounces to the sender and is not stored in the mail queue? | |
3589 | ||
3590 | A0605: In the retry section of the configuration, put | |
3591 | ||
3592 | ==> *@your.dom.ain quota | |
3593 | ||
3594 | That is, provide no retry timings for over quota errors. They will then | |
3595 | bounce immediately. Alternatively, you can set up retries for a short | |
3596 | time only, or use something like this: | |
3597 | ||
3598 | ==> *@your.dom.ain quota_7d | |
3599 | *@your.dom.ain quota F,2h,15m; F,3d,1h | |
3600 | ||
3601 | which bounces immediately if the user's mailbox hasn't been read for 7 | |
3602 | days, but otherwise tries for up to 3 days after the first quota | |
3603 | failure. | |
3604 | ||
3605 | ||
3606 | Q0606: I'm using tmail to do local deliveries, but when I turned on the | |
3607 | \use_crlf\ option on the \%pipe%\ transport (tmail prefers \"@\r@\n"\ | |
3608 | terminations) message bodies started to vanish. | |
3609 | ||
3610 | A0606: You need to unset the \mesage_prefix\ option, or change it so that its | |
3611 | default \"@\n"\ terminator becomes \"@\r@\n"\. For example, the | |
3612 | transport could be: | |
3613 | ||
3614 | ==> local_delivery_mbx: | |
3615 | driver = pipe | |
3616 | command = /usr/local/bin/tmail $local_part | |
3617 | user = exim | |
3618 | current_directory = / | |
3619 | use_crlf | |
3620 | message_prefix = | |
3621 | ||
3622 | The reason for this is as follows: tmail uses the line terminator on | |
3623 | the first line it sees to determine whether lines are terminated by | |
3624 | \"@\r@\n"\ or \"@\n"\. If the latter, it moans to stderr and changes subsequent | |
3625 | \"@\n"\ terminators to \"@\r@\n"\. The default setting of the \message_prefix\ | |
3626 | option is \"From ...@\n"\, and this is unaffected by the \use_crlf\ option. | |
3627 | If you don't change this, tmail sees the first line terminated by | |
3628 | \"@\n"\ and prepends \"@\r"\ to the \"@\n"\ terminator on all subsequent | |
3629 | lines. However, if \use_crlf\ is set, Exim makes all other lines | |
3630 | \"@\r@\n"\ terminated, leading to doubled \"@\r@\r@\n"\ lines and | |
3631 | corrupt mbx mailboxes. | |
3632 | ||
3633 | ||
3634 | Q0607: When I activate ``return receipt'' for example in Netscape Mailbox | |
3635 | sending options, then I get an error message from Exim... something | |
3636 | like \*not supported*\. Can I activate delivery confirmations? | |
3637 | ||
3638 | A0607: Exim does not support any kind of delivery notification. | |
3639 | ||
3640 | (1) You can configure it to recognize headers such as | |
3641 | \Return-receipt-to:\ if you wish. | |
3642 | ||
3643 | (2) Some people want MSN (message status notification). Such services | |
3644 | are implemented in MUAs, and don't impact on the MTA at all. | |
3645 | ||
3646 | (3) I investigated the RFCs which describe the DSN (delivery status | |
3647 | notification) system. However, I was unable to specify any sensible way | |
3648 | of actually doing anything with the data. There were comments on the | |
3649 | mailing list at the time; many people, including me, conclude that DSN | |
3650 | is in practice unworkable. The killer problem is with forwarding and | |
3651 | aliasing. Do you propagate the DSN data with the generated addresses? | |
3652 | Do you send back a ``reached end of the DSN world'' or ``expanded'' message? | |
3653 | Do you do this differently for different kinds of aliasing/forwarding? | |
3654 | For a user who has a \(.forward)\ file with a single address in, this | |
3655 | might seem easy - just propagate the data. But what if there are several | |
3656 | forwardings? If you propagate the DSN data, the sender may get back | |
3657 | several DSN messages - and should the sender really know about the | |
3658 | detail of the receiver's forwarding arrangements? There isn't really | |
3659 | any way to distinguish between a \(.forward)\ file that is forwarding | |
3660 | and one that is a mini mailing list. And so on, and so on. There are so | |
3661 | many questions that don't have obvious answers. | |
3662 | ||
3663 | ||
3664 | Q0608: What does the message \*retry time not reached [for any host]*\ on the log | |
3665 | mean? Why won't Exim try to deliver the message? | |
3666 | ||
3667 | A0608: That is not an error. It means exactly what it says. A previous attempt | |
3668 | to deliver to that address failed with a temporary error, and Exim | |
3669 | computed the earliest time at which to try again. This can apply to | |
3670 | local as well as to remote deliveries. For remote deliveries, each host | |
3671 | (if there are several) has its own retry time. | |
3672 | ||
3673 | If you are running on a dial-up host, the rest of this answer probably | |
3674 | does not apply to you. Go and read Q1404 instead. If your host is | |
3675 | permanently online, read on... | |
3676 | ||
3677 | Some MTAs have a retrying schedule for each message. Exim does not work | |
3678 | like this. Retry timing is normally host-based for remote deliveries and | |
3679 | address-based for local deliveries. (There are some exceptions for certain | |
3680 | kinds of remote failure - see \*Errors in outgoing SMTP*\ in the manual.) | |
3681 | ||
3682 | If a new message arrives for a failing address and the retry time has | |
3683 | not yet arrived, Exim will log \*retry time not reached*\ and leave the | |
3684 | message on the queue, without attempting delivery. Similarly, if a queue | |
3685 | runner notices the message before the time to retry has arrived, it | |
3686 | writes the same log entry. When the retry time has past, Exim attempts | |
3687 | delivery at the next queue run. If you want to know when that will be, | |
3688 | run the exinext utility on the address, for example: | |
3689 | ||
3690 | ==> exinext user@some.domain | |
3691 | ||
3692 | You can suppress these messages on the log by including \"-retry_defer"\ | |
3693 | in the setting of \log_selector\. You can force a delivery attempt on a | |
3694 | specific message (overriding the retry time) by means of the -M option: | |
3695 | ||
3696 | ==> exim -M 10hCET-0000Bf-00 | |
3697 | ||
3698 | If you want to do this for the entire queue, use the \-qf-\ option. | |
3699 | ||
3700 | ||
3701 | Q0609: Exim seems to be sending the same message twice, according to the log, | |
3702 | although there is a difference in capitalization of the local part of | |
3703 | the address. | |
3704 | ||
3705 | A0609: That is correct. The RFCs are explicit in stating that capitalization | |
3706 | matters for local parts. For remote domains, Exim is not entitled to | |
3707 | assume case independence of local parts. I know, it is utterly silly, | |
3708 | and it causes a lot of grief, but that's what the rules say. Here is a | |
3709 | quote from RFC 2821: | |
3710 | ||
3711 | ... a command verb, an argument value other than a mailbox local-part, | |
3712 | and free form text MAY be encoded in upper case, lower case, or any | |
3713 | mixture of upper and lower case with no impact on its meaning. This | |
3714 | is NOT true of a mailbox local-part. The local-part of a mailbox | |
3715 | MUST BE treated as case sensitive. Therefore, SMTP implementations | |
3716 | MUST take care to preserve the case of mailbox local-parts. Mailbox | |
3717 | domains are not case sensitive. In particular, for some hosts the | |
3718 | user "smith" is different from the user "Smith". However, exploiting | |
3719 | the case sensitivity of mailbox local-parts impedes interoperability | |
3720 | and is discouraged. | |
3721 | ||
3722 | ||
3723 | Q0610: How can I force the next retry time for a host to be now? | |
3724 | ||
3725 | A0610: You can change the retry time with the \^exim_fixdb^\ utility, but its | |
3726 | interface is very clumsy. If you have a message for the host on the | |
3727 | queue, the simplest thing to do is to force a delivery with the \-M-\ | |
3728 | command line option. If delivery succeeds, the retry data will get | |
3729 | cleared. If the host is past the cutoff time, so that messages are | |
3730 | bouncing immediately without trying a delivery, you can use \-odq-\ to | |
3731 | put a message on the queue without a delivery attempt, and then use | |
3732 | \-M-\ on it. | |
3733 | ||
3734 | ||
3735 | Q0611: I set up \"|/bin/grep Subject|/usr/bin/smbclient -M <netbiosname>"\ as an | |
3736 | alias but it doesn't work. | |
3737 | ||
3738 | A0611: That is a shell command line. Exim does not run pipe commands under a | |
3739 | shell by default (for added security - and it saves a process). You | |
3740 | need something like | |
3741 | ||
3742 | ==> "|/bin/sh -c '/bin/grep Subject|/usr/bin/smbclient -M <netbiosname>'" | |
3743 | ||
3744 | ||
3745 | Q0612: Why does the \%pipe%\ transport add a line starting with \">From"\ to | |
3746 | messages? | |
3747 | ||
3748 | A0612: Actually, it adds a line starting with \"From"\ followed by a space. | |
3749 | This is commonly referred to as the \"From_"\ line, to emphasize the | |
3750 | fact that \"From"\ is followed by a space and not a colon. This is a | |
3751 | pseudo-header line that contains the envelope sender address and the | |
3752 | time of delivery. It originated as a separator line in Berkeley format | |
3753 | mailboxes, but is also used in other contexts. (And yes, it is often | |
3754 | confused with the ::From:: header line, and this causes a lot of grief. | |
3755 | The use of \"From_"\ was one of the really bad email design decisions.) | |
3756 | ||
3757 | Exim's \%pipe%\ transport adds this pseudo-header line by default | |
3758 | because \(/usr/ucb/vacation)\ needs it, and that is one of the the most | |
3759 | common uses of piping. The \^procmail^\ local delivery agent also makes | |
3760 | use of the \"From_"\ line. If you do not want it, change the setting of | |
3761 | \message_prefix\ on the \%pipe%\ transport. For example, to remove the | |
3762 | line altogether, use | |
3763 | ||
3764 | ==> message_prefix = | |
3765 | ||
3766 | If you are not piping to \(/usr/ucb/vacation)\ or \^procmail^\, it is | |
3767 | likely that you do not need a \"From_"\ line, and indeed it may cause | |
3768 | problems if it is present. | |
3769 | ||
3770 | One user reported that this line gave trouble when a pipe was used to | |
3771 | send messages to Courier's \^deliverquota^\ program. The line was | |
3772 | retained with the message, and caused problems for MS Exchange 2000 when | |
3773 | retrieving messages with its built-in POP collector. Specifically, it | |
3774 | caused Exchange to not be able to recognise message attachments. | |
3775 | ||
3776 | ||
3777 | Q0613: I have set \fallback_hosts\ on my \%smtp%\ transport, but after the error | |
3778 | \*sem@chat.ru cannot be resolved at this time*\ Exim isn't using them. | |
3779 | ||
3780 | A0613: \fallback_hosts\ works only if an attempt at delivery to the original | |
3781 | host(s) fails. In this case, Exim couldn't even resolve the domain | |
3782 | \(chat.ru)\ to discover what the original hosts were, so it never got as far | |
3783 | as the transport. However, see Q0315 for a possible solution. | |
3784 | ||
3785 | ||
3786 | Q0614: After the holidays my ISP has always hundreds of e-mails waiting for me. | |
3787 | These are forced down Exim's throat in one go. Exim spawns a lot of | |
3788 | kids, but is there some limit to the number of processes it creates? | |
3789 | ||
3790 | A0614: Unless you have changed \smtp_accept_queue_per_connection\ it should | |
3791 | spawn only that many processes per connection (default 10). Your ISP | |
3792 | may be making many connections, of course. That is limited by | |
3793 | \smtp_accept_max\. | |
3794 | ||
3795 | ||
3796 | Q0615: When a message in the queue got to 12h old, Exim wrote \*retry timeout | |
3797 | exceeded*\ and removed all messages in the queue to this host - even | |
3798 | recent messages. How I can avoid this behaviour? I only want to remove | |
3799 | messages that have exceeded the maximum retry time. | |
3800 | ||
3801 | A0615: Exim's retrying is host-based rather than message-based. The philosophy | |
3802 | is that if a host has been down for a very long time, there is no point | |
3803 | in keeping messages hanging around. However, you might like to check | |
3804 | out \delay_after_cutoff\ in the \%smtp%\ transport. It doesn't do what you | |
3805 | want, but it might help. | |
3806 | ||
3807 | ||
3808 | Q0616: Can Exim add a ::Content-Length:: header to messages it delivers? | |
3809 | ||
3810 | A0616: You could include something like | |
3811 | ||
3812 | ==> headers_remove = "content-length" | |
3813 | headers_add = "Content-Length: $message_body_size" | |
3814 | ||
3815 | to the \%appendfile%\ transport. However, the use of ::Content-Length:: can | |
3816 | cause several problems, and is not recommended unless you really know | |
3817 | what you are doing. There is a discussion of the problems in | |
3818 | \?http://home.netscape.com/eng/mozilla/2.0/relnotes/demo/content-length.html?\. | |
3819 | ||
3820 | ||
3821 | Q0617: Exim seems to be trying to deliver a message every 10 minutes, though | |
3822 | the retry rules specify longer times after a while, because it is | |
3823 | writing a log entry every time, like this: | |
3824 | ||
3825 | ==> 1999-08-26 14:51:19 11IVsE-000MuP-00 == example@example.com T=smtp defer | |
3826 | (-34): some host address lookups failed and retry time not reached for | |
3827 | other hosts or connection limit reached | |
3828 | ||
3829 | A0617: It is looking at the message every 10 minutes, but it isn't actually | |
3830 | trying to deliver. It's looking up \(example.com)\ in the DNS and finding | |
3831 | this information: | |
3832 | ||
3833 | ==> example.com. MX 10 example-com.isp.example.com. | |
3834 | example.com. MX 0 mail.example.com. | |
3835 | mail.example.com. A 202.77.183.45 | |
3836 | A lookup for example-com.isp.example.com. yielded NXDOMAIN | |
3837 | ||
3838 | The last line means that there is no address (A) record in the DNS for | |
3839 | \(example-com.isp.example.com)\. That accounts for \*some host address | |
3840 | lookups failed*\, but the retry time for \(mail.example.com)\ hasn't been | |
3841 | reached, which accounts for \*retry time not reached for other hosts*\. | |
3842 | ||
3843 | ||
3844 | Q0618: I am trying to set exim up to have a automatic failover if it sees that | |
3845 | the system that it is sending all mail to is down. | |
3846 | ||
3847 | A0618: Add to the \%remote_smtp%\ transport the following: | |
3848 | ||
3849 | ==> fallback_hosts = failover.server.name(s) | |
3850 | ||
3851 | If there are several names, they must be separated by colons. | |
3852 | ||
3853 | ||
3854 | Q0619: I can't get Exim to deliver over NFS. I get the error \*fcntl() failed: | |
3855 | No locks available*\, though the lock daemon is running on the NFS server | |
3856 | and other hosts are able to access it. | |
3857 | ||
3858 | A0619: Check that you have \(lockd)\ running on the NFS client. This is not | |
3859 | always running by default on some systems (Red Hat is believed to be one | |
3860 | such system). | |
3861 | ||
3862 | ||
3863 | Q0620: Why does Exim bounce messages without even attempting delivery, giving | |
3864 | the error \*retry time not reached for any host after a long failure | |
3865 | period*\? | |
3866 | ||
3867 | A0620: This message means that all hosts to which the message could be sent | |
3868 | have been failing for so long that the end of the retry period | |
3869 | (typically 4 or 5 days) has been reached. In this situation, Exim still | |
3870 | computes a next time to retry, but any messages that arrive in the | |
3871 | meantime are bounced straight away. You can alter this behaviour by | |
3872 | unsetting the \delay_after_cutoff\ option on the smtp transport. Then Exim | |
3873 | will try most messages for those hosts once before giving up. | |
3874 | ||
3875 | ||
3876 | Q0621: My \(.forward)\ file is \"|/usr/bin/procmail -f-"\ and mail gets delivered, | |
3877 | but there was a bounce to the sender, sending him the output of procmail. | |
3878 | How can I prevent this? | |
3879 | ||
3880 | A0621: Exim's default configuration is set up like this: | |
3881 | ||
3882 | ==> address_pipe: | |
3883 | driver = pipe | |
3884 | return_output | |
3885 | ||
3886 | The \return_output\ option requests that any output that the pipe | |
3887 | produces be returned to the sender. That is the safest default. If you | |
3888 | don't want this, you can either remove the option altogether, or change | |
3889 | it to \return_fail_output\, to return output only if the command fails. | |
3890 | Note that this will affect all pipes that users run, not just your | |
3891 | procmail one. It might be better to arrange for procmail not to produce | |
3892 | any output when it succeeds. | |
3893 | ||
3894 | ||
3895 | Q0622: Can I write an ordinary file when I run a perl script as a transport | |
3896 | filter for the \%remote_smtp%\ and \%address_pipe%\ transports? | |
3897 | ||
3898 | A0622: Yes, provided the file is writeable by the uid under which the transport | |
3899 | runs (the Exim user in the case of the remote transport). However, if two | |
3900 | messages are being delivered at once, their data will get mixed up in | |
3901 | the file unless you implement your own locking scheme. If all you want | |
3902 | to do is to take a copy of the message, another approach that avoids | |
3903 | the locking problem is to use a system filter to set up an ``unseen'' | |
3904 | delivery to a file. If you only want the message's headers, you can | |
3905 | set \message_filter_file_transport\ to point to a special \%appendfile%\ | |
3906 | transport that has \headers_only\ set. | |
3907 | ||
3908 | ||
3909 | Q0623: My \(/var/spool/mail)\ has grown drastically. Is there any possibility of | |
3910 | using two directories? | |
3911 | ||
3912 | A0623: You can use an expansion string to split mailboxes between two | |
3913 | directories. For example, | |
3914 | ||
3915 | ==> file = /var/spool/mail${nhash_2:$local_part}/$local_part | |
3916 | ||
3917 | which does a hash on the local part, producing either 0 or 1, thereby | |
3918 | using \(mail0) or \(mail1)\. But remember, the MUAs that read these mailboxes | |
3919 | also have to know where they are. | |
3920 | ||
3921 | ||
3922 | Q0624: Sendmail has a program called \^smrsh^\ that restricts what binaries | |
3923 | can be run from sendmail aliases. Is there something like this in Exim ? | |
3924 | ||
3925 | A0624: Check out the \allow_commands\ option in the \%pipe%\ transport. | |
3926 | ||
3927 | ||
3928 | Q0625: I wish to have large emails go out one at a time. | |
3929 | ||
3930 | A0625: One possibility is to set up a router that defers all large messages, | |
3931 | except in queue runs. Since queue runners deliver just one | |
3932 | message at a time, if you limited the number of simultaneous queue | |
3933 | runners to 1, you would get the effect you wanted. A suitable router | |
3934 | might be | |
3935 | ||
3936 | ==> defer_if_large_unless_queue_run: | |
3937 | driver = redirect | |
3938 | condition = ${if or{{queue_running}{<{$message_size}{200K}}}{no}{yes}} | |
3939 | allow_defer | |
3940 | data = :defer: too large for immediate delivery | |
3941 | no_verify | |
3942 | ||
3943 | Of course, this would always delay any large message until the next | |
3944 | queue runner, but if you run them fairly regularly, this shouldn't be a | |
3945 | huge problem, and may even be desirable. Note the use of \no_verify\ to | |
3946 | ensure that this router is not used when Exim is verifying addresses. | |
3947 | ||
3948 | ||
3949 | Q0626: Exim can route local parts independent of their case, but the Cyrus LMTP | |
3950 | daemon requires the correct case. How can I fix this? | |
3951 | ||
3952 | A0626: You need to rewrite the local part to the correct case before running | |
3953 | the router that routes to Cyrus. For example, if you require all lower | |
3954 | case, and your router is called \local_user\, put this router in front | |
3955 | of it: | |
3956 | ||
3957 | ==> lowercase_local: | |
3958 | driver = redirect | |
3959 | redirect_router = local_user | |
3960 | domains = +local_domains | |
3961 | data = ${lc:$local_part}@$domain | |
3962 | ||
3963 | The setting of \redirect_router\ causes processing of the rewritten | |
3964 | address to start at the next router, instead of the first router. See | |
3965 | also Q0630, and C045 for a more complete Cyrus configuration. | |
3966 | ||
3967 | ||
3968 | Q0627: Is there a command I can send to Exim to retry all queued messages | |
3969 | regardless of their retry schedule? | |
3970 | ||
3971 | A0627: The \-qff-\ option starts a queue runner that forces a delivery attempt | |
3972 | for all messages, including frozen ones. If you use \-qf-\, frozen | |
3973 | messages are skipped. | |
3974 | ||
3975 | ||
3976 | Q0628: I have the default retry rule, which I thought meant that Exim should | |
3977 | keep trying for four days, but it seems to be bouncing some messages | |
3978 | immediately. | |
3979 | ||
3980 | A0628: See Q0615 and Q0620. | |
3981 | ||
3982 | ||
3983 | Q0629: I'm having trouble with quotas and Courier, because Exim is not handling | |
3984 | maildirsize files. | |
3985 | ||
3986 | A0629: You will do better to move the quota handling to Courier. Use \^maildrop^\ | |
3987 | as your MDA rather than direct Exim delivery. This also has the | |
3988 | advantage that if you give web access to the mail spool (over \^sqwebmail^\) | |
3989 | you can then use the web front end to edit \^maildrop^\ filter files. | |
3990 | ||
3991 | ||
3992 | Q0630: How can I configure Exim to deliver to a Cyrus message store? | |