From 461f4862f815c93ced69e2551a7bf3691b401add Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Philip Hazel Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:21:25 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Added a new callout suggestion to 294. --- doc/doc-misc/WishList | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/doc-misc/WishList b/doc/doc-misc/WishList index bee4f328a..2da85dac7 100644 --- a/doc/doc-misc/WishList +++ b/doc/doc-misc/WishList @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-misc/WishList,v 1.1 2004/10/08 10:38:47 ph10 Exp $ +$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-misc/WishList,v 1.2 2004/10/14 13:21:25 ph10 Exp $ EXIM 4 WISH LIST ---------------- @@ -1717,6 +1717,13 @@ AUTH during the callout checking, on all types of connection. I suppose that means making TLS available as well. This probably means a rewrite of the code that actually does the callout. Should we use the relevant transport in a new "callout" mode instead of keeping things separate? See also 253. + +And here's another submitted idea: "My actual suggestion is that if this model +is followed, the parent process doesn't have to stop the callout process if it +is taking too long to respond: it can return 450 to the incoming connection +within the 5 minute SMTP command timeout and leave the callout process to +continue, in the hope that it will eventually get a result and store it in the +callout cache in time for the sender's next attempt." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (296) 09-Sep-04 S Make deliver_time work for == lines as well as => -- 2.25.1