From: Philip Hazel <ph10@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:20:30 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Verify recipient with use_postmaster and random was losing
X-Git-Tag: exim-4_52~43
X-Git-Url: https://vcs.fsf.org/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=90e9ce597d563d233e6623a8cb59b67d55a91d03;p=exim.git

Verify recipient with use_postmaster and random was losing
use_postmaster after the random test.
---

diff --git a/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog b/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog
index ffcb6e17b..e1992752f 100644
--- a/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog
+++ b/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog,v 1.160 2005/06/17 09:02:40 ph10 Exp $
+$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog,v 1.161 2005/06/17 10:20:30 ph10 Exp $
 
 Change log file for Exim from version 4.21
 -------------------------------------------
@@ -143,6 +143,11 @@ TK/09 Added "prvs" and "prvscheck" expansion items. These help a lot with
 PH/17 Applied Michael Haardt's patch for HP-UX, affecting only the os.h and
       Makefile that are specific to HP-UX.
 
+PH/18 If the "use_postmaster" option was set for a recipient callout together
+      with the "random" option, the postmaster address was used as the MAIL
+      FROM address for the random test, but not for the subsequent recipient
+      test. It is now used for both.
+
 
 Exim version 4.51
 -----------------
diff --git a/src/src/verify.c b/src/src/verify.c
index e346cf986..2936e7cbd 100644
--- a/src/src/verify.c
+++ b/src/src/verify.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* $Cambridge: exim/src/src/verify.c,v 1.18 2005/05/31 10:58:18 ph10 Exp $ */
+/* $Cambridge: exim/src/src/verify.c,v 1.19 2005/06/17 10:20:30 ph10 Exp $ */
 
 /*************************************************
 *     Exim - an Internet mail transport agent    *
@@ -537,7 +537,8 @@ for (host = host_list; host != NULL && !done; host = host->next)
           smtp_read_response(&inblock, responsebuffer, sizeof(responsebuffer),
             '2', callout) &&
 
-          smtp_write_command(&outblock, FALSE, "MAIL FROM:<>\r\n") >= 0 &&
+          smtp_write_command(&outblock, FALSE, "MAIL FROM:<%s>\r\n",
+            from_address) >= 0 &&
           smtp_read_response(&inblock, responsebuffer, sizeof(responsebuffer),
             '2', callout);
         }
@@ -615,7 +616,7 @@ for (host = host_list; host != NULL && !done; host = host->next)
           }
         }
       }           /* Random not accepted */
-    }             /* MAIL FROM:<> accepted */
+    }             /* MAIL FROM: accepted */
 
   /* For any failure of the main check, other than a negative response, we just
   close the connection and carry on. We can identify a negative response by the
@@ -671,7 +672,7 @@ Otherwise, we looped through the hosts but couldn't complete the business.
 However, there may be domain-specific information to cache in both cases.
 
 The value of the result field in the new_domain record is ccache_unknown if
-there was an error before or with MAIL FROM:<>, and errno was not zero,
+there was an error before or with MAIL FROM:, and errno was not zero,
 implying some kind of I/O error. We don't want to write the cache in that case.
 Otherwise the value is ccache_accept or ccache_reject. */