additional_fields['nid'] = array( 'field' => 'nid', ); $this->additional_fields['type'] = array( 'field' => 'type', ); $this->additional_fields['comment'] = array( 'field' => 'comment', ); } function option_definition() { $options = parent::option_definition(); $options['teaser'] = array('default' => FALSE, 'bool' => TRUE); return $options; } function options_form(&$form, &$form_state) { $form['teaser'] = array( '#type' => 'checkbox', '#title' => t('Show teaser-style link'), '#default_value' => $this->options['teaser'], '#description' => t('Show the comment link in the form used on standard node teasers, rather than the full node form.'), ); parent::options_form($form, $form_state); } function query() { $this->ensure_my_table(); $this->add_additional_fields(); } function render($values) { // Build fake $node. $node = $this->get_value($values); // Call comment.module's hook_link: comment_link($type, $node = NULL, $teaser = FALSE) // Call node by reference so that something is changed here comment_node_view($node, $this->options['teaser'] ? 'teaser' : 'full'); // question: should we run these through: drupal_alter('link', $links, $node); // might this have unexpected consequences if these hooks expect items in $node that we don't have? // Only render the links, if they are defined. return !empty($node->content['links']['comment']) ? drupal_render($node->content['links']['comment']) : ''; } }